Literature DB >> 27737779

Age differences in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning and extinction in rats.

Heidi C Meyer1, David J Bucci2.   

Abstract

Mounting evidence indicates that adolescents exhibit heightened sensitivity to rewards and reward-related cues compared to adults, and that adolescents are often unable to exert behavioral control in the face of such cues. Moreover, differences in reward processing during adolescence have been linked to heightened risk taking and impulsivity. However, little is known about the processes by which adolescents learn about the appetitive properties of environmental stimuli that signal reward. To address this, Pavlovian conditioning procedures were used to test for differences in excitatory conditioning between adult and adolescent rats using various schedules of reinforcement. Specifically, separate cohorts of adult and adolescent rats were trained under conditions of consistent (continuous) or intermittent (partial) reinforcement. We found that the acquisition of anticipatory responding to a continuously-reinforced cue proceeded similarly in adolescents and adults. In contrast, responding increased at a greater rate in adolescents compared to adults during presentations of a partially-reinforced cue. We subsequently compared the ability of adolescent and adult rats to dynamically adjust the representation of a reward-predictive cue during extinction trials, in which a secondary inhibitory representation is acquired for the previously-reinforced stimulus. We observed significant age differences in the ability to flexibly update cue representations during extinction, in that the appetitive properties of cues with a history of either continuous or partial reinforcement persisted to a greater extent in adolescents relative to adults.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescence; Appetitive; Learning; Pavlovian; Reinforcement

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27737779      PMCID: PMC5159263          DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  99 in total

1.  Striatum processes reward differently in adolescents versus adults.

Authors:  David A Sturman; Bita Moghaddam
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Special issue on the teenage brain: Sensitivity to social evaluation.

Authors:  Leah H Somerville
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-04-01

Review 3.  Cellular basis of working memory.

Authors:  P S Goldman-Rakic
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Selective early-acquired fear memories undergo temporary suppression during adolescence.

Authors:  Siobhan S Pattwell; Kevin G Bath; B J Casey; Ipe Ninan; Francis S Lee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Pavlovian conditioning. It's not what you think it is.

Authors:  R A Rescorla
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1988-03

6.  Changes in the dopaminergic innervation of monkey prefrontal cortex during late postnatal development: a tyrosine hydroxylase immunohistochemical study.

Authors:  D R Rosenberg; D A Lewis
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1994-08-15       Impact factor: 13.382

7.  Age and sex differences in impulsive action in rats: the role of dopamine and glutamate.

Authors:  Christie L Burton; Paul J Fletcher
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Novel-object place conditioning in adolescent and adult male and female rats: effects of social isolation.

Authors:  Lewis A Douglas; Elena I Varlinskaya; Linda P Spear
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2003-11

9.  Time course of elevated ethanol intake in adolescent relative to adult rats under continuous, voluntary-access conditions.

Authors:  Courtney S Vetter; Tamara L Doremus-Fitzwater; Linda P Spear
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 3.455

10.  Nicotine-induced conditioned place preference in adolescent and adult rats.

Authors:  Bonnie J Vastola; Lewis A Douglas; Elena I Varlinskaya; Linda P Spear
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2002-09
View more
  8 in total

1.  Translations in Stimulus-Stimulus Pairing: Autoshaping of Learner Vocalizations.

Authors:  Stephanie P da Silva; April Michele Williams
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2019-11-25

Review 2.  Setting the occasion for adolescent inhibitory control.

Authors:  Heidi C Meyer; David J Bucci
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 2.877

3.  Adolescent but not adult Sprague-Dawley rats display goal-directed responding after reward devaluation.

Authors:  Trevor Theodore Towner; Michael Fager; Linda Patia Spear
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.038

4.  Increased sign-tracking behavior in adolescent rats.

Authors:  Nicole E DeAngeli; Sarah B Miller; Heidi C Meyer; David J Bucci
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 3.038

5.  Reinforcement learning and Bayesian inference provide complementary models for the unique advantage of adolescents in stochastic reversal.

Authors:  Maria K Eckstein; Sarah L Master; Ronald E Dahl; Linda Wilbrecht; Anne G E Collins
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 5.811

6.  Consequences of Adolescent Exposure to the Cannabinoid Receptor Agonist WIN55,212-2 on Working Memory in Female Rats.

Authors:  Erin K Kirschmann; Daniel M McCalley; Caitlyn M Edwards; Mary M Torregrossa
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.558

7.  Sex-specific enhancement of palatability-driven feeding in adolescent rats.

Authors:  Andrew T Marshall; Angela T Liu; Niall P Murphy; Nigel T Maidment; Sean B Ostlund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  A Role for Serotonin in Modulating Opposing Drive and Brake Circuits of Impulsivity.

Authors:  Stephanie S Desrochers; Mitchell G Spring; Katherine M Nautiyal
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 3.558

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.