Literature DB >> 15672059

A prospective study of factors that determine cecal intubation time at colonoscopy.

Crystal Bernstein1, Michael Thorn, Kelly Monsees, Rhonda Spell, J Barry O'Connor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For outpatient colonoscopy, the time required to intubate the cecum is variable. The aim of this study was to determine factors associated with cecal intubation time.
METHODS: A total of 693 consecutive outpatient colonoscopies performed from January to October 2002 at a tertiary care medical center were studied prospectively. Data gathered included time required to reach the cecum; patient age, gender, and body mass index; history of abdominal surgery; quality of bowel preparation; presence/absence of diverticula; and endoscopist experience.
RESULTS: Complete data were available for 587 patients. Mean age was 59 years, 48% were men, and mean body mass index was 28. Median cecal intubation time was 9 minutes. Linear regression analysis was performed. Cecal intubation time is prolonged by the following factors: older patient age, female gender, lower body mass index, poor bowel preparation, and lower endoscopist annual case volume.
CONCLUSIONS: This large, prospective study identified 5 factors that prolong the time required for cecal intubation at colonoscopy. These factors may be used to individualize scheduling of colonoscopy according to the time required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15672059     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02461-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  67 in total

1.  Factors affecting colonoscope insertion time in patients with or without a colostomy after left-sided colorectal resection.

Authors:  Hui Won Jang; Yoon Nam Kim; Chung Mo Nam; Hyun Jung Lee; Soo Jung Park; Sung Pil Hong; Tae Il Kim; Won Ho Kim; Jae Hee Cheon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating cap-assisted colonoscopy vs standard colonoscopy.

Authors:  Hoi-Poh Tee; Crispin Corte; Hamdan Al-Ghamdi; Emilia Prakoso; John Darke; Raman Chettiar; Wassim Rahman; Scott Davison; Sean-P Griffin; Warwick-S Selby; Arthur-J Kaffes
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Limited low-air insufflation is optimal for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Yu-Hsi Hsieh; Kuo-Chih Tseng; Hwai-Jeng Lin
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  A prospective audit of patient experiences in colonoscopy using the Global Rating Scale: a cohort of 1,187 patients.

Authors:  Vincent de Jonge; Jerome Sint Nicolaas; Eoin A Lalor; Clarence K Wong; Brennan Walters; Anand Bala; Ernst J Kuipers; Monique E van Leerdam; Sander Jo Veldhuyzen van Zanten
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 5.  Bowel preparations as quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Jae Young Jang; Hoon Jai Chun
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  The timing of bowel preparation is more important than the timing of colonoscopy in determining the quality of bowel cleansing.

Authors:  Chang Soo Eun; Dong Soo Han; Yil Sik Hyun; Joong Ho Bae; Hye Sun Park; Tae Yeob Kim; Yong Cheol Jeon; Joo Hyun Sohn
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Evaluation of formal feedback on endoscopic competence among trainees: the EFFECT trial.

Authors:  G C Harewood; F Murray; S Winder; S Patchett
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  A randomized controlled trial comparing water exchange and air insufflation during colonoscopy without sedation.

Authors:  Makoto Arai; Kenichiro Okimoto; Hideaki Ishigami; Takashi Taida; Arata Oyamada; Shoko Minemura; Keiko Saito; Masaru Tsuboi; Daisuke Maruoka; Tomoaki Matsumura; Tomoo Nakagawa; Tatsuro Katsuno; Kanae Mitsuhashi; Yuki Nakagawa; Kazuya Yamaguchi; Osamu Yokosuka
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Polyp detection rates using magnification with narrow band imaging and white light.

Authors:  Nooman Gilani; Sally Stipho; James D Panetta; Sorin Petre; Michele A Young; Francisco C Ramirez
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-05-16

10.  The influence of health literacy on comprehension of a colonoscopy preparation information leaflet.

Authors:  Samuel G Smith; Christian von Wagner; Lesley M McGregor; Laura M Curtis; Elizabeth A H Wilson; Marina Serper; Michael S Wolf
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.585

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.