Literature DB >> 15669978

Clinal variation and laboratory adaptation in the rainforest species Drosophila birchii for stress resistance, wing size, wing shape and development time.

J A Griffiths1, M Schiffer, A A Hoffmann.   

Abstract

Clinal variation has been described in many invertebrates including drosophilids but usually over broad geographical gradients. Here we describe clinal variation in the rainforest species Drosophila birchii from Queensland, Australia, and potential confounding effects of laboratory adaptation. Clinal variation was detected for starvation and development time, but not for size or resistance to temperature extremes. Starvation resistance was higher at southern locations. Wing shape components were not associated with latitude although they did differ among populations. Time in laboratory culture did not influence wing size or heat knockdown resistance, but increased starvation resistance and decreased recovery time following a cold shock. Laboratory culture also increased development time and altered wing shape. The results indicate that clinal patterns can be detected in Drosophila over a relatively narrow geographical area. Laboratory adaptation is unlikely to have confounded the detection of geographical patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15669978     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00782.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  28 in total

1.  Ancestral populations perform better in a novel environment: domestication of medfly populations from five global regions.

Authors:  Alexandros D Diamantidis; James R Carey; Christos T Nakas; Nikos T Papadopoulos
Journal:  Biol J Linn Soc Lond       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.138

2.  Testing limits to adaptation along altitudinal gradients in rainforest Drosophila.

Authors:  Jon R Bridle; Sedef Gavaz; W Jason Kennington
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  How important is thermal history? Evidence for lasting effects of developmental temperature on upper thermal limits in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Vanessa Kellermann; Belinda van Heerwaarden; Carla M Sgrò
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Upper thermal limits of Drosophila are linked to species distributions and strongly constrained phylogenetically.

Authors:  Vanessa Kellermann; Johannes Overgaard; Ary A Hoffmann; Camilla Fløjgaard; Jens-Christian Svenning; Volker Loeschcke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Genomic Trajectories to Desiccation Resistance: Convergence and Divergence Among Replicate Selected Drosophila Lines.

Authors:  Philippa C Griffin; Sandra B Hangartner; Alexandre Fournier-Level; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Spatiotemporal dynamics and genome-wide association genome-wide association analysis of desiccation tolerance in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Subhash Rajpurohit; Eran Gefen; Alan O Bergland; Dmitri A Petrov; Allen G Gibbs; Paul S Schmidt
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Wing shape as an indicator of larval rearing conditions for Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae).

Authors:  C R Stephens; S A Juliano
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.278

8.  Shape and size variation on the wing of Drosophila mediopunctata: influence of chromosome inversions and genotype-environment interaction.

Authors:  Luciane Mendes Hatadani; Louis Bernard Klaczko
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-10-21       Impact factor: 1.082

9.  Testing evolutionary hypotheses about species borders: patterns of genetic variation towards the southern borders of two rainforest Drosophila and a related habitat generalist.

Authors:  Belinda van Heerwaarden; Vanessa Kellermann; Michele Schiffer; Mark Blacket; Carla M Sgrò; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Selection does not favor larger body size at lower temperature in a seed-feeding beetle.

Authors:  R Craig Stillwell; Jordi Moya-Laraño; Charles W Fox
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.