Literature DB >> 15664481

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of antibacterial activity of cefpodoxime and cefixime in in vitro kinetic models.

Ping Liu1, Kenneth H Rand, Bernd Obermann, Hartmut Derendorf.   

Abstract

The bacterial time-kill curves of cefpodoxime and cefixime against four bacterial strains (Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Streptococcus pneumoniae/penicillin sensitive and S. pneumoniae/penicillin intermediate) were compared in in vitro infection models in which various human pharmacokinetic profiles of unbound antibiotic were simulated. This approach offers more detailed information than the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) does about the time course of antibacterial efficacy of an antibiotic. A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model based on unbound antibiotic concentrations at the site of infection, and a sigmoid Emax-relationship with EC50 as the antibiotic concentration necessary to produce 50% of the maximum effect, effectively described the antimicrobial efficacy of both cefpodoxime and cefixime. The EC50 values of cefpodoxime and cefixime were consistent with their respective MIC values. Both antibiotics had similar high potency against H. influenzae (EC50: 0.04 mg/L) and M. catarrhalis (EC50: 0.12 mg/L), while the potency of cefpodoxime against S. pneumoniae strains was about 10-fold higher than that of cefixime (EC50s/sensitive strain: 0.02 mg/L versus 0.27 mg/L; EC50s/intermediate strain: 0.09 mg/L versus 0.69 mg/L). Applications of this model and unbound tissue PK profiles obtained from a previous clinical study performed in our group, showed that cefpodoxime has higher bacteriological potency than cefixime against S. pneumoniae. Simulations based on this model allow the comparison of antibacterial efficacy of different antibiotics and dosing regimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15664481     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2004.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents        ISSN: 0924-8579            Impact factor:   5.283


  19 in total

1.  Mathematical modeling to characterize the inoculum effect.

Authors:  Pratik Bhagunde; Kai-Tai Chang; Renu Singh; Vandana Singh; Kevin W Garey; Michael Nikolaou; Vincent H Tam
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Pharmacodynamic modeling of in vitro activity of marbofloxacin against Escherichia coli strains.

Authors:  M Andraud; C Chauvin; P Sanders; M Laurentie
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Semimechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model for assessment of activity of antibacterial agents from time-kill curve experiments.

Authors:  Elisabet I Nielsen; Anders Viberg; Elisabeth Löwdin; Otto Cars; Mats O Karlsson; Marie Sandström
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic mathematical model accurately describes the activity of voriconazole against Candida spp. in vitro.

Authors:  Yanjun Li; M Hong Nguyen; Shaoji Cheng; Stephan Schmidt; Li Zhong; Hartmut Derendorf; Cornelius J Clancy
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 5.283

Review 5.  Integrated pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in drug development.

Authors:  Jasper Dingemanse; Silke Appel-Dingemanse
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Predicting in vitro antibacterial efficacy across experimental designs with a semimechanistic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model.

Authors:  Elisabet I Nielsen; Otto Cars; Lena E Friberg
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Evaluation of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships of PD-0162819, a biotin carboxylase inhibitor representing a new class of antibacterial compounds, using in vitro infection models.

Authors:  Adam Ogden; Michael Kuhn; Michael Dority; Susan Buist; Shawn Mehrens; Tong Zhu; Deqing Xiao; J Richard Miller; Debra Hanna
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Comparison of intrapulmonary and systemic pharmacokinetics of colistin methanesulfonate (CMS) and colistin after aerosol delivery and intravenous administration of CMS in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Matthieu Boisson; Matthieu Jacobs; Nicolas Grégoire; Patrice Gobin; Sandrine Marchand; William Couet; Olivier Mimoz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Use of in vitro critical inhibitory concentration, a novel approach to predict in vivo synergistic bactericidal effect of combined amikacin and piperacillin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a systemic rat infection model.

Authors:  Eli Chan; Shufeng Zhou; Sahasranaman Srikumar; Wei Duan
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 10.  Antimicrobial resistance in Haemophilus influenzae.

Authors:  Stephen Tristram; Michael R Jacobs; Peter C Appelbaum
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 26.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.