Literature DB >> 21986824

Evaluation of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships of PD-0162819, a biotin carboxylase inhibitor representing a new class of antibacterial compounds, using in vitro infection models.

Adam Ogden1, Michael Kuhn, Michael Dority, Susan Buist, Shawn Mehrens, Tong Zhu, Deqing Xiao, J Richard Miller, Debra Hanna.   

Abstract

The present study investigated the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationships of a prototype biotin carboxylase (BC) inhibitor, PD-0162819, against Haemophilus influenzae 3113 in static concentration time-kill (SCTK) and one-compartment chemostat in vitro infection models. H. influenzae 3113 was exposed to PD-0162819 concentrations of 0.5 to 16× the MIC (MIC = 0.125 μg/ml) and area-under-the-curve (AUC)/MIC ratios of 1 to 1,100 in SCTK and chemostat experiments, respectively. Serial samples were collected over 24 h. For efficacy driver analysis, a sigmoid maximum-effect (E(max)) model was fitted to the relationship between bacterial density changes over 24 h and corresponding PK/PD indices. A semimechanistic PK/PD model describing the time course of bacterial growth and death was developed. The AUC/MIC ratio best explained efficacy (r(2) = 0.95) compared to the peak drug concentration (C(max))/MIC ratio (r(2) = 0.76) and time above the MIC (T>MIC) (r(2) = 0.88). Static effects and 99.9% killing were achieved at AUC/MIC values of 500 and 600, respectively. For time course analysis, the net bacterial growth rate constant, maximum bacterial density, and maximum kill rate constant were similar in SCTK and chemostat studies, but PD-0162819 was more potent in SCTK than in the chemostat (50% effective concentration [EC(50)] = 0.046 versus 0.34 μg/ml). In conclusion, basic PK/PD relationships for PD-0162819 were established using in vitro dynamic systems. Although the bacterial growth parameters and maximum drug effects were similar in SCTK and the chemostat system, PD-0162819 appeared to be more potent in SCTK, illustrating the importance of understanding the differences in preclinical models. Additional studies are needed to determine the in vivo relevance of these results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21986824      PMCID: PMC3256070          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00090-11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  22 in total

1.  The dearth of new antibiotic development: why we should be worried and what we can do about it.

Authors:  Patrick G P Charles; M Lindsay Grayson
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 7.738

Review 2.  Antibacterial resistance worldwide: causes, challenges and responses.

Authors:  Stuart B Levy; Bonnie Marshall
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  Pharmacodynamic modeling of ciprofloxacin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Campion; Patrick J McNamara; Martin E Evans
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Application of logistic growth model to pharmacodynamic analysis of in vitro bactericidal kinetics.

Authors:  Y Yano; T Oguma; H Nagata; S Sasaki
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 5.  Optimising in vivo pharmacology studies--Practical PKPD considerations.

Authors:  Johan Gabrielsson; A Richard Green; Piet H Van der Graaf
Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 1.950

Review 6.  Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men.

Authors:  W A Craig
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Pharmacodynamic effects of extended dosing intervals of imipenem alone and in combination with amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an in vitro model.

Authors:  B J McGrath; K C Lamp; M J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Predictive pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of tumor growth kinetics in xenograft models after administration of anticancer agents.

Authors:  Monica Simeoni; Paolo Magni; Cristiano Cammia; Giuseppe De Nicolao; Valter Croci; Enrico Pesenti; Massimiliano Germani; Italo Poggesi; Maurizio Rocchetti
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  In vitro models for the study of combination antibiotic therapy in neutropenic patients.

Authors:  S H Zinner; M Dudley; J Blaser
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1986-06-30       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling of antibacterials in vitro and in vivo using bacterial growth and kill kinetics: the minimum inhibitory concentration versus stationary concentration.

Authors:  Johan W Mouton; Alexander A Vinks
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.577

View more
  1 in total

1.  Optimization and Mechanistic Characterization of Pyridopyrimidine Inhibitors of Bacterial Biotin Carboxylase.

Authors:  Logan D Andrews; Timothy R Kane; Paola Dozzo; Cat M Haglund; Darin J Hilderbrandt; Martin S Linsell; Timothy Machajewski; Glen McEnroe; Alisa W Serio; Kenneth B Wlasichuk; David B Neau; Svetlana Pakhomova; Grover L Waldrop; Marc Sharp; Joe Pogliano; Ryan T Cirz; Frederick Cohen
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 7.446

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.