Literature DB >> 15662311

Maintenance of interbody space in one- and two-level anterior cervical interbody fusion: comparison of the effectiveness of autograft, allograft, and cage.

Feng-Chen Kao1, Chi-Chien Niu, Lih-Huei Chen, Po-Liang Lai, Wen-Jer Chen.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The use of allografts, autologous iliac crest grafts, and cages for anterior cervical fusion is well documented, however there is no comparison regarding the effectiveness of maintaining the interbody space with the three approaches. We retrospectively measured the rate and amount of interspace collapse, segmental sagittal angulations, clinical results, and radiographic fusion success rates to determine which is the best fusion material. We assessed 73 patients who had one- and two-level cervical discectomies and interbody fusions without instrumentation. The three groups had similar clinical results and fusion rates. However, in the autograft group union occurred in 4 months. In the allograft group, union did not occur until 5.54 months. Moreover, the loss of cervical lordosis (2.75 degrees) was less in the cage group than in the allograft group (9.23 degrees). Additionally, the anterior interspace collapse (1.73 mm) in the cage group was less than the collapse recorded in the autograft group (2.82 mm) and in the allograft group (4 mm). An interspace collapse of 3 mm or greater was observed in 56.1% of the patients in the allograft group, compared with only 19% of the patients in the cage group. We showed that the cage is superior to the allograft and autograft in maintaining cervical interspace height and cervical lordosis after one-level and two-level anterior cervical decompression procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level III-2 (retrospective cohort study).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15662311     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000142626.90278.9e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  21 in total

1.  Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases.

Authors:  Seok Woo Kim; Marc Anthony Limson; Soo-Bum Kim; Jose Joefrey F Arbatin; Kee-Young Chang; Moon-Soo Park; Jae-hyuk Shin; Yeong-Su Ju
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Sagittal geometry of the middle and lower cervical endplates.

Authors:  Hong Chen; Jian Zhong; Jixiang Tan; Dandong Wu; Dianming Jiang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The application of zero-profile anchored spacer in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Zhiwen Wang; Weimin Jiang; Xuefeng Li; Heng Wang; Jinhui Shi; Jie Chen; Bin Meng; Huilin Yang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Comparison of a zero-profile anchored spacer (ROI-C) and the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages with an anterior plate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Yijie Liu; Heng Wang; Xuefeng Li; Jie Chen; Han Sun; Genlin Wang; Huilin Yang; Weimin Jiang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone cages with two anchoring clips placed in the upper and lower vertebrae, respectively.

Authors:  Jiaquan Luo; Sheng Huang; Ming Gong; Liangping Li; Ting Yu; Xuenong Zou
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-03-04

6.  An early comparative analysis of the use of autograft versus allograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Sang Yong Kim; Ki Seok Park; Sung Sam Jung; Seong Young Chung; Seong Mim Kim; Moon Sun Park; Han Kyu Kim
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2012-09-30

7.  Single-level cervical radiculopathy: clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness of four techniques of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Arup K Bhadra; A S Raman; Adrian T H Casey; R J Crawford
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage filled with cancellous allograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Jen-Chung Liao; Chi-Chien Niu; Wen-Jer Chen; Lih-Huei Chen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Clinical and radiological comparison of femur and fibular allografts for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc diseases.

Authors:  Hyeong-Seok Oh; Chan Shik Shim; Jin-Sung Kim; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2013-01-31

10.  Single-level anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion using PEEK anatomical cervical cage and allograft bone.

Authors:  C Faldini; M Chehrassan; M T Miscione; F Acri; M d'Amato; C Pungetti; D Luciani; S Giannini
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2011-11-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.