Literature DB >> 1566185

Mechanical stability of the pedicle screw fixation systems for the lumbar spine.

M Yamagata1, H Kitahara, S Minami, K Takahashi, K Isobe, H Moriya, T Tamaki.   

Abstract

Five different pedicle screw systems: AO Fixator Interne, VSP Steffee plate, Luque ISF, modified Zielke, and Chiba-type plate screw system (experimental device), were evaluated for biomechanical strength. A fatigue test for the screw, compressive, and torsional tests for the pedicle screw systems and a pull-out test of the pedicle screw were done. Even the Schanz screw, which showed the highest endurance limit, may be broken under the continuous loading condition in the body. The AO Fixator Interne and Steffee plate system themselves are rigid and are indicated for injuries that need reduction. The Luque ISF, modified Zielke, and Chiba-type plate screw systems, however, are indicated for degenerative lumbar disease requiring in situ fusion. There was a linear positive correlation between the bone mineral density of the vertebral body and the pull-out strength of the pedicle screw (correlation coefficient, 0.68). The fixation strength of the pedicle screw to the bone decreased remarkably in osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1566185     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199203001-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  12 in total

1.  Biomechanical analysis of differing pedicle screw insertion angles.

Authors:  William Sterba; Do-Gyoon Kim; David P Fyhrie; Yener N Yeni; Rahul Vaidya
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Pullout strength of anterior spinal instrumentation: a product comparison of seven screws in calf vertebral bodies.

Authors:  Konrad Seller; Dieter Wahl; Alexander Wild; Rüdiger Krauspe; Erich Schneider; Berend Linke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Integrated Fixation Cage Loosening Under Fatigue Loading.

Authors:  Srinidhi Nagaraja; Vivek Palepu
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06-28

4.  Polymethylmethacrylate augmentation of the pedicle screw: the cement distribution in the vertebral body.

Authors:  Ming-Hsien Hu; Hung Ta H Wu; Ming-Chau Chang; Wing-Kuang Yu; Shih-Tien Wang; Chien-Lin Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic spine: indications, limitations and technical aspects.

Authors:  S Hoppe; M J B Keel
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  Risk factors associated with the halo phenomenon after lumbar fusion surgery and its clinical significance.

Authors:  Ho-Joong Kim; Sul-Gee Kim; Hwan-Mo Lee; Hak-Sun Kim; Eun-Su Moon; Jin-Oh Park; Nam-Heon Seol; Seong-Hwan Moon
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2008-06-30

7.  Screws versus hooks: implant cost and deformity correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Bradley P Jaquith; Adam Chase; Phillip Flinn; Jeffrey R Sawyer; William C Warner; Barney L Freeman; Derek M Kelly
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 1.548

8.  Mechanical performance of the Dick internal fixator: a clinical study of 75 patients.

Authors:  P M Rommens; F Weyns; F Van Calenbergh; J Goffin; P L Broos
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Cement embolism into the venous system after pedicle screw fixation: case report, literature review, and prevention tips.

Authors:  Ghassan Kerry; Claus Ruedinger; Hans-Herbert Steiner
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2013-09-12

10.  Biomechanical testing of a unique built-in expandable anterior spinal internal fixation system.

Authors:  Chu-Song Zhou; Yan-Fang Xu; Yu Zhang; Zhong Chen; Hai Lv
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.