Literature DB >> 15657915

Persistence of chromosome aberrations following acute radiation: I, PAINT translocations, dicentrics, rings, fragments, and insertions.

James D Tucker1, Jackie Cofield, Kyomu Matsumoto, Marilyn J Ramsey, D Carl Freeman.   

Abstract

Chromosome translocations are used to estimate the doses of radiation received following occupational or accidental exposure. Biodosimetry relies on the assumption that translocations are not cell-lethal and persist with little or no loss over time. While translocations do exhibit substantially greater persistence than other aberration types (e.g., dicentrics), there is evidence that translocation frequencies also decline over time, at least following acute doses above 1 Gy. To the extent that translocation frequencies decline, the predicted absorbed doses will be underestimated. Yet unknown is whether translocations induced by ionizing radiation at doses below 1 Gy also show significant declines. Here we report on the persistence of translocations induced by 137Cs gamma-rays at acute doses ranging from 0.2 to 4 Gy using peripheral blood lymphocytes from two unrelated healthy male donors. Chromosome aberrations were evaluated by simultaneously painting chromosomes 1, 2, and 4 in red and 3, 5, and 6 in green in cells harvested 2-7 days following exposure and were scored using the PAINT system. Translocations were also enumerated using several other methods and these results are reported separately by us in this issue. For comparison, the persistence of dicentrics, rings, acentric fragments, and color junctions was also evaluated and showed rapid losses with time. The results from both donors provide evidence that translocation frequencies decline with time in a statistically significant manner at doses as low as 0.2-0.3 Gy. The frequency of translocations for all dose groups declined from day 2 to 7 by averages of 39% and 26% for donors 1 and 2, respectively. These data emphasize the importance of considering translocation loss in biological dosimetry long times after exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15657915     DOI: 10.1002/em.20090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen        ISSN: 0893-6692            Impact factor:   3.216


  12 in total

1.  Stable and unstable chromosome aberrations measured after occupational exposure to ionizing radiation and ultrasound.

Authors:  Aleksandra Fucić; Davor Zeljezić; Vilena Kasuba; Nevenka Kopjar; Ruzica Rozgaj; Ruzica Lasan; August Mijić; Vlasta Hitrec; Joe Nathan Lucas
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.351

2.  Chromosomal mosaicism in mouse two-cell embryos after paternal exposure to acrylamide.

Authors:  Francesco Marchetti; Jack Bishop; Xiu Lowe; Andrew J Wyrobek
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Chromosome Translocations, Inversions and Telomere Length for Retrospective Biodosimetry on Exposed U.S. Atomic Veterans.

Authors:  Miles J McKenna; Erin Robinson; Lynn Taylor; Christopher Tompkins; Michael N Cornforth; Steven L Simon; Susan M Bailey
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  International study of factors affecting human chromosome translocations.

Authors:  Alice J Sigurdson; Mina Ha; Michael Hauptmann; Parveen Bhatti; Radim J Sram; Olena Beskid; E Janet Tawn; Caroline A Whitehouse; Carita Lindholm; Mimako Nakano; Yoshiaki Kodama; Nori Nakamura; Irena Vorobtsova; Ursula Oestreicher; Günther Stephan; Lee C Yong; Manfred Bauchinger; Ernst Schmid; Hai Won Chung; Firouz Darroudi; Laurence Roy; Phillipe Voisin; Joan F Barquinero; Gordon Livingston; David Blakey; Isamu Hayata; Wei Zhang; Chunyan Wang; L Michelle Bennett; L Gayle Littlefield; Alan A Edwards; Ruth A Kleinerman; James D Tucker
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Routine diagnostic X-ray examinations and increased frequency of chromosome translocations among U.S. radiologic technologists.

Authors:  Alice J Sigurdson; Parveen Bhatti; Dale L Preston; Michele Morin Doody; Diane Kampa; Bruce H Alexander; Dayton Petibone; Lee C Yong; Alan A Edwards; Elaine Ron; James D Tucker
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Increased sensitivity of subtelomeric regions to DNA double-strand breaks in a human cancer cell line.

Authors:  Oliver Zschenker; Avanti Kulkarni; Douglas Miller; Gloria E Reynolds; Marine Granger-Locatelli; Géraldine Pottier; Laure Sabatier; John P Murnane
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2009-06-18

7.  Cytogenetic analysis of an exposed-referent study: perchloroethylene-exposed dry cleaners compared to unexposed laundry workers.

Authors:  James D Tucker; Karen J Sorensen; Avima M Ruder; Lauralynn Taylor McKernan; Christy L Forrester; Mary Ann Butler
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 5.984

8.  Retrospective biodosimetry using translocation frequency in a stable cell of occupationally exposed to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Min Su Cho; Jin Kyung Lee; Keum Seok Bae; Eun-Ae Han; Seong Jae Jang; Wi-Ho Ha; Seung-Sook Lee; Joan Francesc Barquinero; Wan Tae Kim
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.724

9.  Chromosome analysis of nuclear power plant workers using fluorescence in situ hybridization and Giemsa assay.

Authors:  Rositsa Hristova; Valeria Hadjidekova; Mira Grigorova; Teodora Nikolova; Minka Bulanova; Ljubomira Popova; Albena Staynova; Donka Benova
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  Chromosome Damage Caused by Accidental Chronic Whole-Body Gamma Radiation Exposure in Thailand.

Authors:  B A Ulsh; J Dolling; J Lavoie; R E J Mitchel; D R Boreham
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.