Literature DB >> 10472321

Relation between indicators for quality of occupational rehabilitation of employees with low back pain.

W E van der Weide1, J H Verbeek, F J van Dijk.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess if the implementation of guidelines for occupational rehabilitation of patients with low back pain by means of process variables--a set of objective criteria for technical performance and continuity of care--led to a better outcome in clinical and return to work variables.
METHODS: The study group consisted of 59 patients with at least 10 days of sick leave because of low back pain. Univariate analyses as well as multiple logistic regression and Cox's regression analyses were performed to assess the relation between quality of care and outcome.
RESULTS: Process indicators for technical competence, continuity of care, and total performance were all significantly related to satisfaction of employees. Continuity of care and total performance were significantly related to working status at 3 months, and time to return to work. None of the process indicators was related to pain or disability after 3 months follow up. Satisfaction was not related to any of the other outcome variables. This indicates that if guidelines for occupational rehabilitation are met, outcome is better.
CONCLUSION: Quality of the process of care was related to outcome. Interventions of occupational physicians need improvement in the areas of continuity of care and communication with treating physicians. The effectiveness of an improved intervention should be studied in a subsequent randomised clinical trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10472321      PMCID: PMC1757763          DOI: 10.1136/oem.56.7.488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  21 in total

1.  Peer review by criteria mapping: criteria for diabetes mellitus. The use of decision-making in chart audit.

Authors:  S Greenfield; C E Lewis; S H Kaplan; M B Davidson
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Development and evaluation of a quality assessment instrument for occupational physicians.

Authors:  W E van der Weide; J H Verbeek; F J van Dijk; C T Hulshof
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 3.  The quality of care. How can it be assessed?

Authors:  A Donabedian
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988 Sep 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Comparative validity of the sickness impact profile and shorter scales for functional assessment in low-back pain.

Authors:  R A Deyo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  A study of the natural history of low-back pain. Part II: development of guidelines for trials of treatment in primary care.

Authors:  M Roland; R Morris
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  A clinical comparison of two pain scales: correlation, remembering chronic pain, and a measure of compliance.

Authors:  Steven J Linton; Gunnar K Götestam
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain.

Authors:  M Roland; R Morris
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Measuring satisfaction with medical case management. A quality improvement tool.

Authors:  P C Conbere; P McGovern; L Kochevar; A Widtfeldt
Journal:  AAOHN J       Date:  1992-07

9.  A method for evaluating performance of ambulatory pediatric tasks.

Authors:  R H Palmer; R Strain; J V Maurer; M S Thompson
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Assessing change over time in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  P W Stratford; J Binkley; P Solomon; C Gill; E Finch
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1994-06
View more
  18 in total

1.  Job stress, fatigue, and job dissatisfaction in Dutch lorry drivers: towards an occupation specific model of job demands and control.

Authors:  E M de Croon; R W B Blonk; B C H de Zwart; M H W Frings-Dresen; J P J Broersen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Ineffective disability management by doctors is an obstacle for return-to-work: a cohort study on low back pain patients sicklisted for 3-4 months.

Authors:  J R Anema; A M Van Der Giezen; P C Buijs; W Van Mechelen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Quality of rehabilitation among workers with adjustment disorders according to practice guidelines; a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  K Nieuwenhuijsen; J H A M Verbeek; J C M J Siemerink; D Tummers-Nijsen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 4.  Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave in patients sick listed with acute low back pain: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  I A Steenstra; J H Verbeek; M W Heymans; P M Bongers
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 5.  Comparison of risk factors predicting return to work between patients with subacute and chronic non-specific low back pain: systematic review.

Authors:  C A M Heitz; R Hilfiker; L M Bachmann; H Joronen; T Lorenz; D Uebelhart; A Klipstein; Florian Brunner
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Consumer satisfaction with occupational health services: should it be measured?

Authors:  J Verbeek; F van Dijk; K Räsänen; H Piirainen; E Kankaanpää; C Hulshof
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  Patient satisfaction with occupational health physicians, development of a questionnaire.

Authors:  J H Verbeek; A G de Boer; W E van der Weide; H Piirainen; J R Anema; R J van Amstel; F Hartog
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.402

8.  Return to work of cancer survivors: a prospective cohort study into the quality of rehabilitation by occupational physicians.

Authors:  J Verbeek; E Spelten; M Kammeijer; M Sprangers
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  A multidisciplinary job retention vocational rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic rheumatic diseases: patients' and occupational physicians' satisfaction.

Authors:  P D M de Buck; J Breedveld; F J van der Giesen; T P M Vliet Vlieland
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Evidence-based guidelines in the evaluation of work disability: an international survey and a comparison of quality of development.

Authors:  Wout El de Boer; David J Bruinvels; Arie M Rijkenberg; Peter Donceel; Johannes R Anema
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.