| Literature DB >> 15654698 |
Stephen M Smith1, Christian F Beckmann, Narender Ramnani, Mark W Woolrich, Peter R Bannister, Mark Jenkinson, Paul M Matthews, David J McGonigle.
Abstract
We revisit a previous study on inter-session variability (McGonigle et al. [2000]: Neuroimage 11:708-734), showing that contrary to one popular interpretation of the original article, inter-session variability is not necessarily high. We also highlight how evaluating variability based on thresholded single-session images alone can be misleading. Finally, we show that the use of different first-level preprocessing, time-series statistics, and registration analysis methodologies can give significantly different inter-session analysis results. Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.Mesh:
Year: 2005 PMID: 15654698 PMCID: PMC6871748 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20080
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Brain Mapp ISSN: 1065-9471 Impact factor: 5.038