Literature DB >> 8027345

Evaluation of RapID onE system for identification of 379 strains in the family Enterobacteriaceae and oxidase-negative, gram-negative nonfermenters.

T T Kitch1, M R Jacobs, P C Appelbaum.   

Abstract

The ability of the RapID onE system (Innovative Diagnostic Systems, Inc., Norcross, Ga.) to identify 364 strains in the family Enterobacteriaceae and 15 oxidase-negative, gram-negative, nonfermentative rods was evaluated. Kits were inoculated with no. 2 McFarland standard suspensions, and reactions were interpreted after 4 h of incubation at 35 degrees C. Overall, the method correctly identified (to the species level or to the genus level for salmonellas and non-Shigella sonnei Shigella species) 363 strains (95.8%) without additional tests. For four strains (1.0%), additional tests were required to delineate the correct identification from a range of two or more possibilities; these included one Serratia liquefaciens (Serratia marcescens or Serratia liquefaciens), one Serratia rubidaea (Serratia rubidaea or Serratia odorifera), one Salmonella typhi (Leminorella richardii or Salmonella sp.) and one Yersinia enterocolitica (Yersinia frederiksenii, Yersinia intermedia, or Yersinia enterocolitica). Twelve strains (3.2%) were misidentified or yielded codes with no identification; these comprised one Citrobacter amalonaticus (no identification), three Enterobacter hormaechei (not in the RapID onE database; two Enterobacter amnigenus, one Enterobacter sp.), one Serratia liquefaciens (Enterobacter cloacae), one Serratia rubidaea (no identification), four Serratia fonticola (not in RapID onE database; two Enterobacter aerogenes, one Serratia marcescens, one not identified), one Proteus mirabilis (Proteus penneri), and one Proteus vulgaris (Providencia rustigianii). If the seven strains not included in the database had been excluded, correct identification rates would have risen to 97.6% without additional tests and 98.7% with additional tests, with misidentification rates dropping to 1.3%. The RapID onE system is easy to set up and the results are easy to read, and the system provides an accurate, nonautomated commercially available method for the same-day identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and oxidase-negative, gram-negative nonfermenters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8027345      PMCID: PMC263165          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.32.4.931-934.1994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  29 in total

1.  Rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the micro-ID system versus API 20E and conventional media.

Authors:  A L Barry; R E Badal
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Microdilution and agar replica identification test systems.

Authors:  P R Murray
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 1.935

3.  Clinical evaluation of the minitek differential system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  P J Finklea; M S Cole; T M Sodeman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of the API rapid E four-hour system with the API 20E overnight system for the identification of routine clinical isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  T L Overman; D Plumley; S B Overman; N L Goodman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Evaluation of the four-hour rapid 20E system for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  D Izard; M O Husson; P Vincent; H Leclerc; D Monget; J M Boeufgras
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Evaluation of the Vitek EPS enteric pathogen screen card for detecting Salmonella, Shigella, and Yersinia spp.

Authors:  C A Imperatrice; I Nachamkin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Evaluation of the repliscan system for Enterobacteriaceae identification.

Authors:  B F Woolfrey; C O Quall; J M Fox
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of two methods for same-day identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  P C Appelbaum; R R Arthur; M E Parker; G L Shugar; L C Von Kuster; P Charache
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.493

9.  Comparison of three methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  P C Appelbaum; R R Arthur; M E Parker; G L Shugar; L C von Kuster; P Charache
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Comparative evaluation of the Eiken and API 20E systems and conventional methods for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  C B Castillo; D A Bruckner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  5 in total

1.  Particular biochemical profiles for enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 isolates on the ID 32E system.

Authors:  A Leclercq; B Lambert; D Pierard; J Mahillon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Manual and automated instrumentation for identification of Enterobacteriaceae and other aerobic gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  Caroline M O'hara
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Biochemical profiles and serotypes of nosocomial Enterobacter cloacae strains in Northern Norway: biochemical identification problems with commercial test systems.

Authors:  B M Andersen
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.553

4.  Clinical significance and antibiotic resistance patterns of Leminorella spp., an emerging nosocomial pathogen.

Authors:  L Blekher; Y Siegman-Igra; D Schwartz; S A Berger; Y Carmeli
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Citrobacter amalonaticus human urinary tract infections, Marseille, France.

Authors:  V Garcia; C Abat; V Moal; J-M Rolain
Journal:  New Microbes New Infect       Date:  2016-01-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.