Literature DB >> 22159550

An ERP study on the processing of common fractions.

Li Zhang1, Ziqiang Xin, Fuhong Li, Qi Wang, Cody Ding, Hong Li.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine how adults processed common fractions with common numerators under two distinct conditions. Whereas participants were presented with only common fractions in a "simple" condition, a "complex" condition involved the random presentation of common fractions as well as decimal fractions. In both conditions, participants were required to assess whether various "target" fractions were larger than or smaller than a "standard" common fraction (1/5). Behavioral results indicated that under both conditions, participants mentally processed the fractions componentially in terms of their constituent parts rather than holistically in terms of the numerical value of the fraction as a whole. The data provided by the event-related potentials (ERPs) demonstrated electrophysiological correlates of the componential processing of common fractions in the simple condition, as reflected in the latency and amplitude of P3. However, in contrast to what the behavioral data showed, there was no strong electrophysiological evidence to indicate that common fractions were accessed componentially in the complex condition. In addition, the complex condition was linked to longer latency and more negative amplitude of N2 over the frontal scalp than the simple condition, which could be attributed to the fact that the comparison of fractions in the complex condition involved task switching and thus was more taxing on cognitive control than the simple condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22159550     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2969-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  36 in total

Review 1.  The relevance of behavioural measures for functional-imaging studies of cognition.

Authors:  David Wilkinson; Peter Halligan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Components of switching intentional set.

Authors:  Matthew F S Rushworth; R E Passingham; A C Nobre
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b.

Authors:  John Polich
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  The organization of brain activations in number comparison: event-related potentials and the additive-factors method.

Authors:  S Dehaene
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  On the interaction of numerical and size information in digit comparison: a behavioral and event-related potential study.

Authors:  W Schwarz; H J Heinze
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Shifting attention between global features and small details: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  B Kotchoubey; E Wascher; R Verleger
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1997-06-20       Impact factor: 3.251

7.  The effect of numerical distance and stimulus probability on ERP components elicited by numerical incongruencies in mental addition.

Authors:  Dénes Szucs; Valéria Csépe
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-02

8.  Time required for judgements of numerical inequality.

Authors:  R S Moyer; T K Landauer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1967-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Evidence for direct retrieval of relative quantity information in a quantity judgment task: decimals, integers, and the role of physical similarity.

Authors:  Dale J Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Effects of caffeine on anticipatory control processes: evidence from a cued task-switch paradigm.

Authors:  Zoë Tieges; Jan Snel; Albert Kok; Niels Plat; Richard Ridderinkhof
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  2 in total

1.  An ERP study of the processing of common and decimal fractions: how different they are.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Qi Wang; Chongde Lin; Cody Ding; Xinlin Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The componential processing of fractions in adults and children: effects of stimuli variability and contextual interference.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Qiaochu Fang; Florence C Gabriel; Dénes Szücs
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.