Literature DB >> 15652714

Attrition in a population-based cohort eight years after baseline interview: The Cornella Health Interview Survey Follow-up (CHIS.FU) Study.

Montse Garcia1, Esteve Fernandez, Anna Schiaffino, Carme Borrell, Merce Marti, Josep Maria Borras.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine how response at follow-up varied from baseline sociodemographic data in a Spanish population-based cohort after 8 years of follow-up.
METHODS: The Cornella Health Interview Survey Follow-up (CHIS.FU) Study is a population-based cohort study on lifestyle risk factors and their consequences on health status with 2500 participants at baseline. We have compared the distribution of baseline characteristics according to the results at follow-up (interview, decease, migration, or refusal).
RESULTS: Almost two-thirds of the subjects who did not respond to the follow-up interview had died or moved to another town. Sex was a determinant of attrition in deceased and non-traced participants. Refusal appeared to be associated with working status and place of birth. Self-perceived health was one of the characteristics associated with mortality; subjects who perceived their health as poor were 2.6 times more likely to die than those who felt they were in good health. Disabled and retired subjects together with housewives showed a higher risk of dying than individuals still working. The determinants of attrition among emigrated subjects were civil status, age, level of studies, working status, and birth place.
CONCLUSION: Although the attrition was non-random, there was no serious bias in estimates of change and in determinants of change due to attrition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15652714     DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2004.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  12 in total

1.  Is personality a key predictor of missing study data? An analysis from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anthony Jerant; Benjamin P Chapman; Paul Duberstein; Peter Franks
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Attrition of older Mexican American survey respondents.

Authors:  Jim P Stimpson; Laura A Ray
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2008-05-16

3.  Predictors of follow-up and assessment of selection bias from dropouts using inverse probability weighting in a cohort of university graduates.

Authors:  Alvaro Alonso; María Seguí-Gómez; Jokin de Irala; Almudena Sánchez-Villegas; Juan José Beunza; Miguel Angel Martínez-Gonzalez
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  Non-response to baseline, non-response to follow-up and mortality in the Whitehall II cohort.

Authors:  Jane E Ferrie; Mika Kivimäki; Archana Singh-Manoux; Alison Shortt; Pekka Martikainen; Jenny Head; Michael Marmot; David Gimeno; Roberto De Vogli; Marko Elovainio; Martin J Shipley
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Predicting complete loss to follow-up after a health-education program: number of absences and face-to-face contact with a researcher.

Authors:  M J Park; Yoshihiko Yamazaki; Yuki Yonekura; Keiko Yukawa; Hirono Ishikawa; Takahiro Kiuchi; Joseph Green
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Inequality in oral health related to early and later life social conditions: a study of elderly in Norway and Sweden.

Authors:  Ferda Gülcan; Gunnar Ekbäck; Sven Ordell; Stein Atle Lie; Anne Nordrehaug Åstrøm
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.757

7.  The possible absence of a healthy-worker effect: a cross-sectional survey among educated Japanese women.

Authors:  Mariko Nishikitani; Mutsuhiro Nakao; Shinobu Tsurugano; Eiji Yano
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Non-response bias and hazardous alcohol use in relation to previous alcohol-related hospitalization: comparing survey responses with population data.

Authors:  Kozma Ahacic; Ingemar Kåreholt; Asgeir R Helgason; Peter Allebeck
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2013-03-04

9.  Determinants of non- response to a second assessment of lifestyle factors and body weight in the EPIC-PANACEA study.

Authors:  Anne M May; Lotte E Adema; Dora Romaguera; Anne-Claire Vergnaud; Antonio Agudo; Ulf Ekelund; Annika Steffen; Philippos Orfanos; Nadia Slimani; Sabina Rinaldi; Traci Mouw; Sabine Rohrmann; Silke Hermann; Heiner Boeing; Manuela M Bergmann; Marianne Uhre Jakobsen; Kim Overvad; Nicholas J Wareham; Carlos Gonzalez; Anne Tjonneland; Jytte Halkjaer; Timothy J Key; Elizabeth A Spencer; Veronica Hellstrom; Jonas Manjer; Bo Hedblad; Eiliv Lund; Tonje Braaten; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Laudina Rodríguez; Maria J Sánchez; Miren Dorronsoro; Aurelio Barricarte; Jose Maria Huerta; Androniki Naska; Antonia Trichopoulou; Domenico Palli; Valeria Pala; Teresa Norat; Amalia Mattiello; Rosario Tumino; Daphne van der A; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Elio Riboli; Petra H M Peeters
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Correlates of exposure to second-hand smoke in an urban Mediterranean population.

Authors:  Jorge Twose; Anna Schiaffino; Montse García; Josep Maria Borras; Esteve Fernández
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2007-08-05       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.