Literature DB >> 16736275

Predictors of follow-up and assessment of selection bias from dropouts using inverse probability weighting in a cohort of university graduates.

Alvaro Alonso1, María Seguí-Gómez, Jokin de Irala, Almudena Sánchez-Villegas, Juan José Beunza, Miguel Angel Martínez-Gonzalez.   

Abstract

Dropouts in cohort studies can introduce selection bias. In this paper, we aimed (i) to assess predictors of retention in a cohort study (the SUN Project) where participants are followed-up through biennial mailed questionnaires, and (ii) to evaluate whether differential follow-up introduced selection bias in rate ratio (RR) estimates. The SUN Study recruited 9907 participants from December 1999 to January 2002. Among them, 8647 (87%) participants answered the 2-year follow-up questionnaire. The presence of missing information in key variables at baseline, being younger, smoker, a marital status different of married, being obese/overweight and a history of motor vehicle injury were associated with being lost to follow-up, while a self-reported history of cardiovascular disease predicted a higher retention proportion. To assess whether differential follow-up affected RR estimates, we studied the association between body mass index and the risk of hypertension, using inverse probability weighting (IPW) to adjust for confounding and selection bias. Obese individuals had a higher crude rate of hypertension compared with normoweight participants (RR=6.4, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.9-10.5). Adjustment for confounding using IPW attenuated the risk of hypertension associated to obesity (RR=2.4, 95% CI: 1.1-5.3). Additional adjustment for selection bias did not modify the estimations. In conclusion, we show that the follow-up through mailed questionnaires of a geographically disperse cohort in Spain is possible. Furthermore, we show that despite existing differences between retained or lost to follow-up participants this may not necessarily have an important impact on the RR estimates of hypertension associated to obesity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16736275     DOI: 10.1007/s10654-006-9008-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  22 in total

1.  Attrition in longitudinal studies. How to deal with missing data.

Authors:  Jos Twisk; Wieke de Vente
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Bias.

Authors:  Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez; Javier Llorca
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Attrition in a population-based cohort eight years after baseline interview: The Cornella Health Interview Survey Follow-up (CHIS.FU) Study.

Authors:  Montse Garcia; Esteve Fernandez; Anna Schiaffino; Carme Borrell; Merce Marti; Josep Maria Borras
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  Response and follow-up bias in cohort studies.

Authors:  S Greenland
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Development and validation of a food frequency questionnaire in Spain.

Authors:  J M Martin-Moreno; P Boyle; L Gorgojo; P Maisonneuve; J C Fernandez-Rodriguez; S Salvini; W C Willett
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  Mediterranean diet and stroke: objectives and design of the SUN project. Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra.

Authors:  M A Martínez-González; A Sanchez-Villegas; J De Irala; A Marti; J A Martínez
Journal:  Nutr Neurosci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.994

7.  Loss to follow-up in a longitudinal study on aging in Spain.

Authors:  M V Zunzunegui; F Béland; P Gutiérrez-Cuadra
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 8.  A systematic literature review of attrition between waves in longitudinal studies in the elderly shows a consistent pattern of dropout between differing studies.

Authors:  Mark D Chatfield; Carol E Brayne; Fiona E Matthews
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  Response rates to a questionnaire 26 years after baseline examination with minimal interim participant contact and baseline differences between respondents and nonrespondents.

Authors:  Amber Pirzada; Lijing L Yan; Daniel B Garside; Linda Schiffer; Alan R Dyer; Martha L Daviglus
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Validation of self reported diagnosis of hypertension in a cohort of university graduates in Spain.

Authors:  Alvaro Alonso; Juan José Beunza; Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez; Miguel Angel Martínez-González
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  21 in total

1.  Representativeness, losses to follow-up and validity in cohort studies.

Authors:  Alvaro Alonso; Jokin de Irala; Miguel Angel Martínez-González
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Assessing the Potential for Bias From Nonresponse to a Study Follow-up Interview: An Example From the Agricultural Health Study.

Authors:  Jessica L Rinsky; David B Richardson; Steve Wing; John D Beard; Michael Alavanja; Laura E Beane Freeman; Honglei Chen; Paul K Henneberger; Freya Kamel; Dale P Sandler; Jane A Hoppin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 3.  Exposure to air pollution as a potential contributor to cognitive function, cognitive decline, brain imaging, and dementia: A systematic review of epidemiologic research.

Authors:  Melinda C Power; Sara D Adar; Jeff D Yanosky; Jennifer Weuve
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 4.294

4.  Association between pre-pregnancy consumption of meat, iron intake, and the risk of gestational diabetes: the SUN project.

Authors:  Amelia Marí-Sanchis; Ginette Díaz-Jurado; F Javier Basterra-Gortari; Carmen de la Fuente-Arrillaga; Miguel A Martínez-González; Maira Bes-Rastrollo
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 5.614

5.  Assessment of self-selection bias in a pediatric unilateral hearing loss study.

Authors:  Judith E C Lieu; Karuna Dewan
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 6.  Rationales, design and recruitment for the Elfe longitudinal study.

Authors:  Stéphanie Vandentorren; Corinne Bois; Claudine Pirus; Hélène Sarter; Georges Salines; Henri Leridon
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 2.125

7.  Incarceration, incident hypertension, and access to health care: findings from the coronary artery risk development in young adults (CARDIA) study.

Authors:  Emily A Wang; Mark Pletcher; Feng Lin; Eric Vittinghoff; Stefan G Kertesz; Catarina I Kiefe; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-04-13

8.  Investigation of selection bias using inverse probability weighting.

Authors:  Kazim Sheikh
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 12.434

9.  The LIFE child study: a life course approach to disease and health.

Authors:  Mirja Quante; Mara Hesse; Mirko Döhnert; Michael Fuchs; Christian Hirsch; Elena Sergeyev; Nora Casprzig; Mandy Geserick; Stephanie Naumann; Christiane Koch; Matthew A Sabin; Andreas Hiemisch; Antje Körner; Wieland Kiess
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Determinants of non- response to a second assessment of lifestyle factors and body weight in the EPIC-PANACEA study.

Authors:  Anne M May; Lotte E Adema; Dora Romaguera; Anne-Claire Vergnaud; Antonio Agudo; Ulf Ekelund; Annika Steffen; Philippos Orfanos; Nadia Slimani; Sabina Rinaldi; Traci Mouw; Sabine Rohrmann; Silke Hermann; Heiner Boeing; Manuela M Bergmann; Marianne Uhre Jakobsen; Kim Overvad; Nicholas J Wareham; Carlos Gonzalez; Anne Tjonneland; Jytte Halkjaer; Timothy J Key; Elizabeth A Spencer; Veronica Hellstrom; Jonas Manjer; Bo Hedblad; Eiliv Lund; Tonje Braaten; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Laudina Rodríguez; Maria J Sánchez; Miren Dorronsoro; Aurelio Barricarte; Jose Maria Huerta; Androniki Naska; Antonia Trichopoulou; Domenico Palli; Valeria Pala; Teresa Norat; Amalia Mattiello; Rosario Tumino; Daphne van der A; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Elio Riboli; Petra H M Peeters
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.