Literature DB >> 15650862

Prediction of responses to various stimuli during sedation: a comparison of three EEG variables.

Matsuyuki Doi1, Koji Morita, Haralambos Mantzaridis, Shigehito Sato, Gavin N C Kenny.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the ability of the aepEX, a derivative of auditory evoked potentials, the bispectral index, and SEF95% to predict responses to various stimuli.
DESIGN: Prospective clinical study.
SETTING: General Intensive Care Unit in a university hospital. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Forty postsurgical, mechanically ventilated patients.
INTERVENTIONS: Target concentrations of blood propofol were randomly set at 0.5 microg/ml, 1.0 microg/ml, 1.5 microg/ml, and 2.0 microg/ml, with a fixed fentanyl infusion rate between 0.5 microg.kg(-1).h(-1) and 1.5 microg.kg(-1).h(-1). MEASUREMENTS: Depth of sedation was subjectively assessed with the Ramsay Sedation Score. The aepEX was recorded using an auditory evoked potentials system. The bispectral index and SEF95% were measured using an Aspect A-1000 monitor.
RESULTS: The aepEX, bispectral index, and SEF95% correlated with the Ramsay Sedation Score, the Pk value being greatest for the aepEX, followed by the bispectral index. All three variables could predict opening of the eyes in response to verbal commands or a glabellar tap, the aepEX being a better predictor than the bispectral index or SEF95%. All three EEG variables had Pk values >0.5 in predicting coughing or movement in response to tracheal suction, but they were unable to predict increases in heart rate or systolic blood pressure.
CONCLUSIONS: The aepEX was the best predictor, followed by bispectral index. Although in most intensive care patients subjective sedation scales are sufficient to assess levels of sedation, the aepEX and bispectral index were potential alternatives to subjective scales when they do not work well in the setting of neuromuscular blockade or may not be sufficiently sensitive to evaluate very deep sedation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15650862     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-004-2516-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  20 in total

1.  Effects of the auditory stimuli of an auditory evoked potential system on levels of consciousness, and on the bispectral index.

Authors:  A R Absalom; N Sutcliffe; G N Kenny
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  A portable target controlled propofol infusion system.

Authors:  G N Kenny; M White
Journal:  Int J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1992-10

3.  Relationship between calculated blood concentration of propofol and electrophysiological variables during emergence from anaesthesia: comparison of bispectral index, spectral edge frequency, median frequency and auditory evoked potential index.

Authors:  M Doi; R J Gajraj; H Mantzaridis; G N Kenny
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 4.  Measuring the performance of anesthetic depth indicators.

Authors:  W D Smith; R C Dutton; N T Smith
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Prospective evaluation of the Sedation-Agitation Scale for adult critically ill patients.

Authors:  R R Riker; J T Picard; G L Fraser
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Comparison of five sedation scoring systems by means of auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  A M Schulte-Tamburen; J Scheier; J Briegel; D Schwender; K Peter
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Auditory evoked potential index predicts the depth of sedation and movement in response to skin incision during sevoflurane anesthesia.

Authors:  T Kurita; M Doi; T Katoh; H Sano; S Sato; H Mantzaridis; G N Kenny
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Assessing sedation during intensive care unit mechanical ventilation with the Bispectral Index and the Sedation-Agitation Scale.

Authors:  L E Simmons; R R Riker; B S Prato; G L Fraser
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  How reliable is the Bispectral Index in critically ill patients? A prospective, comparative, single-blinded observer study.

Authors:  Stanley A Nasraway SA; Eugene C Wu; Ruth M Kelleher; Cynthia M Yasuda; Anne M Donnelly
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Continuous infusion of haloperidol controls agitation in critically ill patients.

Authors:  R R Riker; G L Fraser; P M Cox
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  8 in total

1.  Year in review in intensive care medicine, 2005. II. Infection and sepsis, ventilator-associated pneumonia, ethics, haematology and haemostasis, ICU organisation and scoring, brain injury.

Authors:  Peter Andrews; Elie Azoulay; Massimo Antonelli; Laurent Brochard; Christian Brun-Buisson; Geoffrey Dobb; Jean-Yves Fagon; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Jordi Mancebo; Philipp Metnitz; Stefano Nava; Jerome Pugin; Michael Pinsky; Peter Radermacher; Christian Richard; Robert Tasker
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  [Measurement of the depth of anaesthesia].

Authors:  G N Schmidt; J Müller; P Bischoff
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Sedation and analgesia in German intensive care units: how is it done in reality? Results of a patient-based survey of analgesia and sedation.

Authors:  Jörg Martin; Martin Franck; Matthias Fischer; Claudia Spies
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Assessing sedation in critically ill children by bispectral index, auditory-evoked potentials and clinical scales.

Authors:  Adelaida Lamas; Jesús López-Herce; Luis Sancho; Santiago Mencía; Angel Carrillo; Maria José Santiago; Vicente Martínez
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  The Use of Middle Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials (MLAEP) as Methodology for Evaluating Sedation Level in Propofol-Drug Induced Sleep Endoscopy (DISE) Procedure.

Authors:  Michele Arigliani; Domenico M Toraldo; Enrico Ciavolino; Caterina Lattante; Luana Conte; Serena Arima; Caterina Arigliani; Antonio Palumbo; Michele De Benedetto
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Middle latency auditory-evoked potential index monitoring of cerebral function to predict functional outcome after emergency craniotomy in patients with brain damage.

Authors:  Junya Tsurukiri; Katsuhiro Nagata; Akira Hoshiai; Taishi Oomura; Hiroyuki Jimbo; Yukio Ikeda
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Urine Neutrophil Gelatinase-associated Lipocalin (NGAL) for Prediction of Persistent AKI and Major Adverse Kidney Events.

Authors:  Nuttha Lumlertgul; Monpraween Amprai; Sasipha Tachaboon; Janejira Dinhuzen; Sadudee Peerapornratana; Stephen J Kerr; Nattachai Srisawat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Monitoring sedation for bronchoscopy in mechanically ventilated patients by using the Ramsay sedation scale versus auditory-evoked potentials.

Authors:  Chien-Wei Hsu; Shu-Fen Sun; Kuo-An Chu; David Lin Lee; Kam-Fai Wong
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.317

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.