Literature DB >> 11506107

Auditory evoked potential index predicts the depth of sedation and movement in response to skin incision during sevoflurane anesthesia.

T Kurita1, M Doi, T Katoh, H Sano, S Sato, H Mantzaridis, G N Kenny.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The auditory evoked potential (AEP) index, which is a single numerical parameter derived from the AEP in real time and which describes the underlying morphology of the AEP, has been studied as a monitor of anesthetic depth. The current study was designed to evaluate the accuracy of AEPindex for predicting depth of sedation and anesthesia during sevoflurane anesthesia.
METHODS: In the first phase of the study, a single end-tidal sevoflurane concentration ranging from 0.5 to 0.9% was assigned randomly and administered to each of 50 patients. The AEPindex and the Bispectral Index (BIS) were obtained simultaneously. Sedation was assessed using the responsiveness portion of the observer's assessment of alertness-sedation scale. In the second phase of the study, 10 additional patients were included, and the 60 patients who were scheduled to have skin incisions were observed for movement in response to skin incision at the end-tidal sevoflurane concentrations between 1.6 and 2.6%. The relation among AEPindex, BIS, sevoflurane concentration, sedation score, and movement or absence of movement after skin incision was determined. Prediction probability values for AEPindex, BIS, and sevoflurane concentration to predict depth of sedation and anesthesia were also calculated.
RESULTS: The AEPindex, BIS, and sevoflurane concentration correlated closely with the sedation score. The prediction probability values for AEPindex, BIS, and sevoflurane concentration for sedation score were 0.820, 0.805, and 0.870, respectively, indicating a high predictive performance for depth of sedation. AEPindex and sevoflurane concentration successfully predicted movement after skin (prediction probability = 0.910 and 0.857, respectively), whereas BIS could not (prediction probability = 0.537).
CONCLUSIONS: Auditory evoked potential index can be a guide to the depth of sedation and movement in response to skin incision during sevoflurane anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11506107     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200108000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  12 in total

1.  Intraoperative auditory evoked potential recordings are more reliable at signal detection from different sensor sites on the forehead compared to bispectral index.

Authors:  Yoshiya Ishioka; Shigekazu Sugino; Tomo Hayase; Piotr K Janicki
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Using a short-term parameter of heart rate variability to distinguish awake from isoflurane anesthetic states.

Authors:  Hui-Hsun Huang; Yi-Hui Lee; Hsiao-Lung Chan; Yong-Ping Wang; Chi-Hsiang Huang; Shou-Zen Fan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Prediction of responses to various stimuli during sedation: a comparison of three EEG variables.

Authors:  Matsuyuki Doi; Koji Morita; Haralambos Mantzaridis; Shigehito Sato; Gavin N C Kenny
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Auditory evoked potential index does not correlate with observer assessment of alertness and sedation score during 0.5% bupivacaine spinal anesthesia with nitrous oxide sedation alone.

Authors:  Junko Ichikawa; Kumiko Taira; Keiko Nishiyama; Masato Endo; Mitsuharu Kodaka; Miwako Kawamata; Makiko Komori; Makoto Ozaki
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  The Use of Middle Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials (MLAEP) as Methodology for Evaluating Sedation Level in Propofol-Drug Induced Sleep Endoscopy (DISE) Procedure.

Authors:  Michele Arigliani; Domenico M Toraldo; Enrico Ciavolino; Caterina Lattante; Luana Conte; Serena Arima; Caterina Arigliani; Antonio Palumbo; Michele De Benedetto
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Change in auditory evoked potential index and bispectral index during induction of anesthesia with anesthetic drugs.

Authors:  Sachiko Matsushita; Shinya Oda; Kei Otaki; Masaki Nakane; Kaneyuki Kawamae
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Comparison of the myocardial protective effect of sevoflurane versus propofol in patients undergoing heart valve replacement surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Xiao-Lin Yang; Dan Wang; Guo-Yuan Zhang; Xiao-Lan Guo
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  How Bispectral Index Compares to Spectral Entropy of the EEG and A-line ARX Index in the Same Patient.

Authors:  Werner Tiefenthaler; Joshua Colvin; Bernhard Steger; Karl P Pfeiffer; Patrizia L Moser; Janette Walde; Ingo H Lorenz; Christian Kolbitsch
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2018-11-24

9.  Clinical comparison of propofol-remifentanil TCI with sevoflurane induction/maintenance anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Xiaoqian Deng; Tao Zhu
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.088

10.  A New Technological Advancement of the Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy (DISE) Procedure: The "All in One Glance" Strategy.

Authors:  Michele Arigliani; Domenico M Toraldo; Filippo Montevecchi; Luana Conte; Lorenzo Galasso; Filippo De Rosa; Caterina Lattante; Enrico Ciavolino; Caterina Arigliani; Antonio Palumbo; Michele De Benedetto; Claudio Vicini
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.