Literature DB >> 15650012

Optimised, low cost, low field dedicated extremity MRI is highly specific and sensitive for synovitis and bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis wrist and finger joints: comparison with conventional high field MRI and radiography.

B J Ejbjerg1, E Narvestad, S Jacobsen, H S Thomsen, M Østergaard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a low field dedicated extremity MRI unit for detection of bone erosions, synovitis, and bone marrow oedema in wrist and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints, with a high field MRI unit as the standard reference.
METHODS: In 37 patients with RA and 28 healthy controls MRI of the wrist and 2nd-5th MCP joints was performed on a low field MRI unit (0.2 T Esaote Artoscan) and a high field MRI unit (1.0 T Siemens Impact) on 2 subsequent days. MRI was performed and evaluated according to OMERACT recommendations. Additionally, conventional x ray, clinical, and biochemical examinations were performed. In an initial low field MRI "sequence selection phase", based on a subset of 10 patients and 10 controls, sequences for comparison with high field MRI were selected.
RESULTS: With high field, spin echo MRI considered as the reference method, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of low field 3D gradient echo MRI for erosions were 94%, 93%, 94%, while the corresponding values for x ray examination were 33%, 98%, and 83%. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of low field MRI for synovitis were 90%, 96%, and 94%, and for bone marrow oedema 39%, 99%, and 95%. Intraclass correlation coefficients between low field and high field scores were 0.936 (p<0.005) for bone erosions and 0.923 (p<0.05) for synovitis.
CONCLUSION: Low field MRI provides high accuracy for detection and grading of erosions and synovitis, with high field MRI as the standard reference. For bone marrow oedema, specificity is high, but sensitivity only moderate. Low cost, patient compliant, low field dedicated extremity MRI provides similar information on bone erosions and synovitis as expensive high field MRI units.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15650012      PMCID: PMC1755626          DOI: 10.1136/ard.2004.029850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  33 in total

Review 1.  Treating rheumatoid arthritis early: a window of opportunity?

Authors:  James R O'Dell
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2002-02

2.  New radiographic bone erosions in the wrists of patients with rheumatoid arthritis are detectable with magnetic resonance imaging a median of two years earlier.

Authors:  Mikkel Østergaard; Michael Hansen; Michael Stoltenberg; Karl Erik Jensen; Marcin Szkudlarek; Brigitta Pedersen-Zbinden; Ib Lorenzen
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2003-08

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging and miniarthroscopy of metacarpophalangeal joints: sensitive detection of morphologic changes in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  B Ostendorf; R Peters; P Dann; A Becker; A Scherer; F Wedekind; J Friemann; K P Schulitz; U Mödder; M Schneider
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2001-11

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging, radiography, and scintigraphy of the finger joints: one year follow up of patients with early arthritis. The TIRA Group.

Authors:  M Klarlund; M Ostergaard; K E Jensen; J L Madsen; H Skjødt; I Lorenzen
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Low field dedicated magnetic resonance imaging in untreated rheumatoid arthritis of recent onset.

Authors:  H Lindegaard; J Vallø; K Hørslev-Petersen; P Junker; M Østergaard
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  MRI of the wrist and finger joints in inflammatory joint diseases at 1-year interval: MRI features to predict bone erosions.

Authors:  Anette Savnik; Hanne Malmskov; Henrik S Thomsen; Lykke B Graff; Henrik Nielsen; Bente Danneskiold-Samsøe; Jens Boesen; Henning Bliddal
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001-09-25       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Bone edema scored on magnetic resonance imaging scans of the dominant carpus at presentation predicts radiographic joint damage of the hands and feet six years later in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Fiona M McQueen; Nick Benton; David Perry; Jeff Crabbe; Elizabeth Robinson; Sue Yeoman; Lachy McLean; Neal Stewart
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2003-07

Review 8.  OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies. Core set of MRI acquisitions, joint pathology definitions, and the OMERACT RA-MRI scoring system.

Authors:  Mikkel Østergaard; Charles Peterfy; Philip Conaghan; Fiona McQueen; Paul Bird; Bo Ejbjerg; Ron Shnier; Philip O'Connor; Mette Klarlund; Paul Emery; Harry Genant; Marissa Lassere; John Edmonds
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.666

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the fifth metatarsophalangeal joint compared with conventional radiography in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  K Forslind; A Johanson; E M Larsson; B Svensson
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 10.  The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire: dimensions and practical applications.

Authors:  Bonnie Bruce; James F Fries
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2003-06-09       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  36 in total

Review 1.  [Magnetic resonance imaging of the hand in rheumatoid arthritis. New scientific insights and practical application].

Authors:  K-G A Hermann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in early rheumatoid arthritis: recent advances.

Authors:  Mikkel Østergaard; Uffe M Døhn; Bo J Ejbjerg; Fiona M McQueen
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 3.  Emerging MRI methods in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Camilo G Borrero; James M Mountz; John D Mountz
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 20.543

4.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging of the wrist in rheumatoid arthritis: dedicated low-field (0.25-T) versus high-field (3.0-T) MRI.

Authors:  Ryan K L Lee; James F Griffith; D F Wang; L Shi; David K W Yeung; Edmund K Li; L S Tam
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  [Imaging in rheumatic diseases. Rheumatoid arthritis and differential diagnostics].

Authors:  T Diekhoff; K-G A Hermann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Current imaging strategies in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Merissa N Zeman; Peter Jh Scott
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-03-28

7.  Diagnostic quality and scoring of synovitis, tenosynovitis and erosions in low-field MRI of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with conventional MRI.

Authors:  Claudia Schirmer; Alexander K Scheel; Christian E Althoff; Tania Schink; Iris Eshed; Alexander Lembcke; Gerd-Rüdiger Burmester; Marina Backhaus; Bernd Hamm; Kay-Geert A Hermann
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 8.  Insights into rheumatoid arthritis from use of MRI.

Authors:  Fiona M McQueen; Estee Chan
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.592

9.  A comparison of dedicated 1.0 T extremity MRI vs large-bore 1.5 T MRI for semiquantitative whole organ assessment of osteoarthritis: the MOST study.

Authors:  F W Roemer; J A Lynch; J Niu; Y Zhang; M D Crema; I Tolstykh; G Y El-Khoury; D T Felson; C E Lewis; M C Nevitt; A Guermazi
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  Low-cost, low-field dedicated extremity magnetic resonance imaging in early rheumatoid arthritis: a 1-year follow-up study.

Authors:  H M Lindegaard; J Vallø; K Hørslev-Petersen; P Junker; M Østergaard
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 19.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.