Literature DB >> 16540550

Low-cost, low-field dedicated extremity magnetic resonance imaging in early rheumatoid arthritis: a 1-year follow-up study.

H M Lindegaard1, J Vallø, K Hørslev-Petersen, P Junker, M Østergaard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the ability of low-cost low-field dedicated extremity magnetic resonance imaging (E-MRI) to assess and predict erosive joint damage in the wrist and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.
METHODS: 24 previously untreated patients with rheumatoid arthritis with joint symptoms for <1 year were evaluated at the time of diagnosis and after 6 and 12 months of methotrexate treatment with conventional clinical or biochemical examinations, x rays of both hands and wrists, and E-MRI of the dominant wrist and MCP joints.
RESULTS: At baseline, all patients showed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) synovitis, and MRI erosions were detected in 21 bones (10 patients). 6 (29%) of these, distributed among two patients, were seen on x ray. One x ray erosion was not detected by MRI. At 1 year, MRI and x ray detected 15 and 8 new erosions, respectively, and 19% of MRI erosions at baseline had progressed to x ray erosions. In bones with MRI erosions at baseline, the relative risk of having x ray erosions at the 1-year follow-up was 12.1, compared with bones without baseline MRI erosions (lesion-centred analysis). If bones with baseline x ray erosions were excluded, the relative risk was 5.2. In patients with baseline MRI bone erosion or oedema, the relative risk of having x ray erosions at 1 year was 4.0, compared with patients without these signs at baseline (patient-centred analysis).
CONCLUSION: In this group of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis who were treated uniformly, baseline E-MRI erosions in MCP or wrist bones markedly increased the risk of x ray erosions at the 1-year follow-up. Low-cost, low-field dedicated extremity MRI is promising for assessment and prognostication of early rheumatoid arthritis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16540550      PMCID: PMC1798294          DOI: 10.1136/ard.2005.049213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  27 in total

1.  Radiographic evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis and related conditions by standard reference films.

Authors:  A Larsen; K Dale; M Eek
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1977-07

2.  The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  F C Arnett; S M Edworthy; D A Bloch; D J McShane; J F Fries; N S Cooper; L A Healey; S R Kaplan; M H Liang; H S Luthra
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1988-03

3.  MRI of the wrist and finger joints in inflammatory joint diseases at 1-year interval: MRI features to predict bone erosions.

Authors:  Anette Savnik; Hanne Malmskov; Henrik S Thomsen; Lykke B Graff; Henrik Nielsen; Bente Danneskiold-Samsøe; Jens Boesen; Henning Bliddal
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001-09-25       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Identification of wrist and metacarpophalangeal joint erosions using a portable magnetic resonance imaging system compared to conventional radiographs.

Authors:  John V Crues; Frank G Shellock; Siamak Dardashti; Timothy W James; Orrin M Troum
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.666

5.  Bone edema scored on magnetic resonance imaging scans of the dominant carpus at presentation predicts radiographic joint damage of the hands and feet six years later in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Fiona M McQueen; Nick Benton; David Perry; Jeff Crabbe; Elizabeth Robinson; Sue Yeoman; Lachy McLean; Neal Stewart
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2003-07

6.  Prognostic factors and diagnostic criteria in early rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  K Kaarela
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol Suppl       Date:  1985

7.  Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in patients with rheumatoid arthritis can discriminate active from inactive disease.

Authors:  Marco A Cimmino; Stefania Innocenti; Fabrizio Livrone; Francesca Magnaguagno; Enzo Silvestri; Giacomo Garlaschi
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2003-05

8.  Prognosis of inflammatory joint diseases. A three-year follow-up study.

Authors:  M Nissilä; H Isomäki; K Kaarela; P Kiviniemi; J Martio; S Sarna
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  Elucidation of the relationship between synovitis and bone damage: a randomized magnetic resonance imaging study of individual joints in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Philip G Conaghan; Philip O'Connor; Dennis McGonagle; Paul Astin; Richard J Wakefield; Wayne W Gibbon; Mark Quinn; Zunaid Karim; Michael J Green; Susanna Proudman; John Isaacs; Paul Emery
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2003-01

10.  Rheumatoid arthritis of the hand and wrist: comparison of three imaging techniques.

Authors:  Bachir Taouli; Souhil Zaim; Charles G Peterfy; John A Lynch; Alexander Stork; Ali Guermazi; Bo Fan; Kenneth H Fye; Harry K Genant
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  16 in total

1.  The MR Cap: A single-sided MRI system designed for potential point-of-care limited field-of-view brain imaging.

Authors:  Patrick C McDaniel; Clarissa Zimmerman Cooley; Jason P Stockmann; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-06-23       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  A vital clue to deciphering bone pathology: MRI bone oedema in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis.

Authors:  F M McQueen
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Cost-effectiveness of adding magnetic resonance imaging to rheumatoid arthritis management.

Authors:  Lisa G Suter; Liana Fraenkel; R Scott Braithwaite
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-04-11

Review 4.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Lisa G Suter; Liana Fraenkel; R Scott Braithwaite
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 5.  Enthesitis in seronegative spondyloarthropathies with special attention to the knee joint by MRI: a step forward toward understanding disease pathogenesis.

Authors:  Ragab Yasser; Emad Yasser; Darweesh Hanan; El Shaarawy Nashwa; Johannes J Rasker
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 6.  The impact of MRI on the clinical management of inflammatory arthritides.

Authors:  Ulrich Weber; Mikkel Østergaard; Robert G W Lambert; Walter P Maksymowych
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  No erosive progression revealed by MRI in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with etanercept, even in patients with persistent MRI and clinical signs of joint inflammation.

Authors:  Uffe Møller Døhn; Henrik Skjødt; Merete Lund Hetland; Aage Vestergaard; Jakob M Møller; Lene Surland Knudsen; Bo Jannik Ejbjerg; Henrik S Thomsen; Mikkel Ostergaard
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  A comparison of dedicated 1.0 T extremity MRI vs large-bore 1.5 T MRI for semiquantitative whole organ assessment of osteoarthritis: the MOST study.

Authors:  F W Roemer; J A Lynch; J Niu; Y Zhang; M D Crema; I Tolstykh; G Y El-Khoury; D T Felson; C E Lewis; M C Nevitt; A Guermazi
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  In-office magnetic resonance imaging to monitor responses to therapy in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Norman B Gaylis; Steven D Needell
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.631

10.  [Project REMISSION(PLUS): clinical and radiological remission : new treatment goals in the management of rheumatoid arthritis].

Authors:  B Ostendorf; A Scherer; H Kellner; M Backhaus
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.