Literature DB >> 15647962

Elective cesarean section to prevent anal incontinence and brachial plexus injuries associated with macrosomia--a decision analysis.

Patrick J Culligan1, John A Myers, Roger P Goldberg, Linda Blackwell, Stephan F Gohmann, Troy D Abell.   

Abstract

Our aim was to determine the cost-effectiveness of a policy of elective C-section for macrosomic infants to prevent maternal anal incontinence, urinary incontinence, and newborn brachial plexus injuries. We used a decision analytic model to compare the standard of care with a policy whereby all primigravid patients in the United States would undergo an ultrasound at 39 weeks gestation, followed by an elective C-section for any fetus estimated at > or =4500 g. The following clinical consequences were considered crucial to the analysis: brachial plexus injury to the newborn; maternal anal and urinary incontinence; emergency hysterectomy; hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion; and maternal mortality. Our outcome measures included (1) number of brachial plexus injuries or cases of incontinence averted, (2) incremental monetary cost per 100,000 deliveries, (3) expected quality of life of the mother and her child, and (4) "quality-adjusted life years" (QALY) associated with the two policies. For every 100,000 deliveries, the policy of elective C-section resulted in 16.6 fewer permanent brachial plexus injuries, 185.7 fewer cases of anal incontinence, and cost savings of $3,211,000. Therefore, this policy would prevent one case of anal incontinence for every 539 elective C-sections performed. The expected quality of life associated with the elective C-section policy was also greater (quality of life score 0.923 vs 0.917 on a scale from 0.0 to 1.0 and 53.6 QALY vs 53.2). A policy whereby primigravid patients in the United States have a 39 week ultrasound-estimated fetal weight followed by C-section for any fetuses > or =4500 g appears cost effective. However, the monetary costs in our analysis were sensitive to the probability estimates of urinary incontinence following C-section and vaginal delivery and the cost estimates for urinary incontinence, vaginal delivery, and C-section.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15647962     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-004-1203-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  39 in total

1.  Predictors of episiotomy use at first spontaneous vaginal delivery.

Authors:  J N Robinson; E R Norwitz; A P Cohen; E Lieberman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 2.  Treatment options for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  W E Whitehead; A Wald; N J Norton
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  The effectiveness and costs of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by ultrasound.

Authors:  D J Rouse; J Owen; R L Goldenberg; S P Cliver
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-11-13       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Are sphincter defects the cause of anal incontinence after vaginal delivery? Results of a prospective study.

Authors:  L Abramowitz; I Sobhani; R Ganansia; A Vuagnat; J L Benifla; E Darai; P Madelenat; M Mignon
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 5.  Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine.

Authors:  M C Weinstein; J E Siegel; M R Gold; M S Kamlet; L B Russell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-10-16       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The immediate and long-term outcome of obstetric birth trauma. I. Brachial plexus paralysis.

Authors:  M Gordon; H Rich; J Deutschberger; M Green
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1973-09-01       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Risk of new-onset urinary incontinence after forceps and vacuum delivery in primiparous women.

Authors:  L A Arya; N D Jackson; D L Myers; A Verma
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Annual direct cost of urinary incontinence.

Authors:  L Wilson; J S Brown; G P Shin; K O Luc; L L Subak
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Emergency hysterectomy for obstetric hemorrhage.

Authors:  S L Clark; S Y Yeh; J P Phelan; S Bruce; R H Paul
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Estimators of birth weight in pregnant women requiring insulin: a comparison of seven sonographic models.

Authors:  R A McLaren; J L Puckett; S P Chauhan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  16 in total

1.  Treating mild gestational diabetes mellitus: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Mika S Ohno; Teresa N Sparks; Yvonne W Cheng; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  The cost-effectiveness of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in primary and secondary care in the Republic of Ireland.

Authors:  Andriy Danyliv; Paddy Gillespie; Ciaran O'Neill; Marie Tierney; Angela O'Dea; Brian E McGuire; Liam G Glynn; Fidelma P Dunne
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 10.122

3.  Universal late pregnancy ultrasound screening to predict adverse outcomes in nulliparous women: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Gordon Cs Smith; Alexandros A Moraitis; David Wastlund; Jim G Thornton; Aris Papageorghiou; Julia Sanders; Alexander Ep Heazell; Stephen C Robson; Ulla Sovio; Peter Brocklehurst; Edward Cf Wilson
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 4.  Shoulder dystocia: prediction and management.

Authors:  Meghan G Hill; Wayne R Cohen
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2016-02-22

5.  Cost-effectiveness of second curettage for treatment of low-risk non-metastatic gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.

Authors:  Samantha Batman; Ashley Skeith; Allison Allen; Elizabeth Munro; Aaron Caughey; Amanda Bruegl
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 6.  Fecal incontinence: a review of prevalence and obstetric risk factors.

Authors:  Andrea Wang; Marsha Guess; Kathleen Connell; Kenneth Powers; George Lazarou; Magdy Mikhail
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-06-23

7.  Pelvic floor consequences of cesarean delivery on maternal request in women with a single birth: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Xiao Xu; Julie S Ivy; Divya A Patel; Sejal N Patel; Dean G Smith; Scott B Ransom; Dee Fenner; John O L Delancey
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Gestational diabetes screening with the new IADPSG guidelines: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  John F Mission; Mika S Ohno; Yvonne W Cheng; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Intraoperative Cell Salvage for Obstetric Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Grace Lim; Vladyslav Melnyk; Francesca L Facco; Jonathan H Waters; Kenneth J Smith
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Design of FitFor2 study: the effects of an exercise program on insulin sensitivity and plasma glucose levels in pregnant women at high risk for gestational diabetes.

Authors:  Nicolette Oostdam; Mireille N M van Poppel; Elisabeth M W Eekhoff; Maurice G A J Wouters; Willem van Mechelen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-01-05       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.