Literature DB >> 15645312

Cancer risk estimates for gamma-rays with regard to organ-specific doses Part II: site-specific solid cancers.

Linda Walsh1, Werner Rühm, Albrecht M Kellerer.   

Abstract

Part I of this study presented an analysis of the solid cancer mortality data for 1950-1997 from the Japanese life-span study of the A-bomb survivors to assess the cancer risk for gamma-rays in terms of the organ-specific dose for all solid cancers combined. Compared to earlier analyses, considerably more curvature in the dose-effect relation is indicated by these computations, which now suggests a dose and dose-rate effectiveness factor of about 2. The computations are extended here in order to explore the site-specific solid cancer risks for various organs. A computational method has been developed whereby the site-specific cancer risks are all simultaneously computed with global age and gender effect modifiers. This provides a more parsimonious representation with fewer parameters and avoids the large relative standard errors which would otherwise result. The sensitivity of site-specific risks to the choices of the neutron RBE is examined. The site-specific risk estimates are quite sensitive to the neutron RBE for the least shielded organs such as the breast, bladder and oesophagus. For the deeper lying organs, such as the gallbladder, pancreas and uterus, the impact of the neutrons is much lower. With an assumed neutron RBE of 35, which is in line with results on low neutron doses in major past studies on rodents and which corresponds approximately to the current ICRP radiation weighting factor for neutrons, the neutrons appear to contribute about 40% of the observed excess cancer risk in the breast, i.e. the organ that is closest to the body surface. However, this neutron contribution fraction is only about 10% for deeper lying organs, such as the colon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15645312     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-004-0263-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  8 in total

1.  Risk estimation for fast neutrons with regard to solid cancer.

Authors:  A M Kellerer; L Walsh
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Experimental simulation of A-bomb gamma ray spectra: revisited.

Authors:  John E Pattison; Lester C Payne; Richard P Hugtenburg; Alun H Beddoe; Monty W Charles
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 12, Part I. Cancer: 1950-1990.

Authors:  D A Pierce; Y Shimizu; D L Preston; M Vaeth; K Mabuchi
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Lung carcinomas in Sprague-Dawley rats after exposure to low doses of radon daughters, fission neutrons, or gamma rays.

Authors:  J Lafuma; D Chmelevsky; J Chameaud; M Morin; R Masse; A M Kellerer
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Risk coefficient for gamma-rays with regard to solid cancer.

Authors:  Albrecht M Kellerer; Linda Walsh; Elke A Nekolla
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Studies of mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 13: Solid cancer and noncancer disease mortality: 1950-1997.

Authors:  Dale L Preston; Yukiko Shimizu; Donald A Pierce; Akihiko Suyama; Kiyohiko Mabuchi
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Induction of mammary neoplasms in the Sprague-Dawley rat by 430keV neutrons and X-rays.

Authors:  C J Shellabarger; D Chmelevsky; A M Kellerer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Cancer risk estimates for gamma-rays with regard to organ-specific doses. Part I: All solid cancers combined.

Authors:  Linda Walsh; Werner Rühm; Albrecht M Kellerer
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2004-08-07       Impact factor: 1.925

  8 in total
  8 in total

1.  Solid tumor risks after high doses of ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Rainer K Sachs; David J Brenner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Estimation of organs doses and radiation-induced secondary cancer risk from scattered photons for conventional radiation therapy of nasopharynx: a Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  Asghar Mesbahi; Farshad Seyednejad; Amir Gasemi-Jangjoo
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Measurements of fast neutrons in Hiroshima by use of (39)Ar.

Authors:  Eckehart Nolte; Werner Rühm; H Hugo Loosli; Igor Tolstikhin; Kazuo Kato; Thomas C Huber; Stephen D Egbert
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 4.  Assessment of the risk for developing a second malignancy from scattered and secondary radiation in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.316

5.  Cancer risk estimates from the combined Japanese A-bomb and Hodgkin cohorts for doses relevant to radiotherapy.

Authors:  Uwe Schneider; Linda Walsh
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Cancer risk estimates for gamma-rays with regard to organ-specific doses. Part I: All solid cancers combined.

Authors:  Linda Walsh; Werner Rühm; Albrecht M Kellerer
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2004-08-07       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  Site-specific dose-response relationships for cancer induction from the combined Japanese A-bomb and Hodgkin cohorts for doses relevant to radiotherapy.

Authors:  Uwe Schneider; Marcin Sumila; Judith Robotka
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 2.432

Review 8.  Are Risks From Medical Imaging Still too Small to Be Observed or Nonexistent?

Authors:  Brant A Ulsh
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 2.658

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.