Literature DB >> 11741494

Risk estimation for fast neutrons with regard to solid cancer.

A M Kellerer1, L Walsh.   

Abstract

In the absence of epidemiological information on the effects of neutrons, their cancer mortality risk coefficient is currently taken as the product of two low-dose extrapolations: the nominal risk coefficient for photons and the presumed maximum relative biological effectiveness of neutrons. This approach is unnecessary. Since linearity in dose is assumed for neutrons at low to moderate effect levels, the risk coefficient can be derived in terms of the excess risk from epidemiological observations at an intermediate dose of gamma rays and an assumed value, R(1), of the neutron RBE relative to this reference dose of gamma rays. Application of this procedure to the A-bomb data requires accounting for the effect of the neutron dose component, which, according to the current dosimetry system, DS86, amounts on average to 11 mGy in the two cities at a total dose of 1 Gy. With R(1) tentatively set to 20 or 50, it is concluded that the neutrons have caused 18% or 35%, respectively, of the total effect at 1 Gy. The excess relative risk (ERR) for neutrons then lies between 8 per Gy and 16 per Gy. Translating these values into risk coefficients in terms of the effective dose, E, requires accounting for the gamma-ray component produced by the neutron field in the human body, which will require a separate analysis. The risk estimate for neutrons will remain essentially unaffected by the current reassessment of the neutron doses in Hiroshima, because the doses are unlikely to change much at the reference dose of 1 Gy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11741494     DOI: 10.1667/0033-7587(2001)156[0708:reffnw]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  7 in total

1.  Choice of model and uncertainties of the gamma-ray and neutron dosimetry in relation to the chromosome aberrations data in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Authors:  W Rühm; L Walsh; M Chomentowski
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2003-07-03       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 2.  A short review of model selection techniques for radiation epidemiology.

Authors:  Linda Walsh
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2007-04-28       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Modeling of cell inactivation and carcinogenesis in the atomic bomb survivors with applications to the mortality from all solid, stomach and liver cancer.

Authors:  Peter Jacob; Linda Walsh; Markus Eidemüller
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Neutron relative biological effectiveness for solid cancer incidence in the Japanese A-bomb survivors: an analysis considering the degree of independent effects from γ-ray and neutron absorbed doses with hierarchical partitioning.

Authors:  Linda Walsh
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2012-11-17       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Cancer risk estimates for gamma-rays with regard to organ-specific doses Part II: site-specific solid cancers.

Authors:  Linda Walsh; Werner Rühm; Albrecht M Kellerer
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2004-11-13       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Cancer risk estimates from the combined Japanese A-bomb and Hodgkin cohorts for doses relevant to radiotherapy.

Authors:  Uwe Schneider; Linda Walsh
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  Cancer risk estimates for gamma-rays with regard to organ-specific doses. Part I: All solid cancers combined.

Authors:  Linda Walsh; Werner Rühm; Albrecht M Kellerer
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2004-08-07       Impact factor: 1.925

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.