Literature DB >> 15639613

PENDULUM--a guideline-based approach to the interpretation of STR mixtures.

Martin Bill1, Peter Gill, James Curran, Tim Clayton, Richard Pinchin, Marcus Healy, John Buckleton.   

Abstract

Several years ago, a theory to interpret mixed DNA profiles was proposed that included a consideration of peak area using the method of least squares. This method of mixture interpretation has not been widely adopted because of the complexity of the associated calculations. Most reporting officers (RO) employ an experience and judgement based approach to the interpretation of mixed DNA profiles. Here we present an approach that has formalised the thinking behind this experience and judgement. This has been written into a computer program package called PENDULUM. The program uses a least squares method to estimate the pre-amplification mixture proportion for two potential contributors. It then calculates the heterozygous balance for all of the potential sets of genotypes. A list of "possible" genotypes is generated using a set of heuristic rules. External to the programme the candidate genotypes may then be used to formulate likelihood ratios (LR) that are based on alternative casework propositions. The system does not represent a black box approach; rather it has been integrated into the method currently used by the reporting officers at the Forensic Science Service (FSS). The time saved in automating routine calculations associated with mixtures analysis is significant. In addition, the computer program assists in unifying reporting processes, thereby improving the consistency of reporting.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15639613     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.06.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  10 in total

1.  Automated DNA profile analysis.

Authors:  Eleanor A M Graham
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.007

Review 2.  DNA reviews: the national DNA database of the United Kingdom.

Authors:  E A M Graham
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.007

Review 3.  Separation/extraction, detection, and interpretation of DNA mixtures in forensic science (review).

Authors:  Ruiyang Tao; Shouyu Wang; Jiashuo Zhang; Jingyi Zhang; Zihao Yang; Xiang Sheng; Yiping Hou; Suhua Zhang; Chengtao Li
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  The forensic value of X-linked markers in mixed-male DNA analysis.

Authors:  HaiJun He; Lagabaiyila Zha; JinHong Cai; Jian Huang
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  An information gap in DNA evidence interpretation.

Authors:  Mark W Perlin; Alexander Sinelnikov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A ranking index for quality assessment of forensic DNA profiles forensic DNA profiles.

Authors:  Johannes Hedman; Ricky Ansell; Anders Nordgaard
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2010-11-09

7.  A graphical simulation model of the entire DNA process associated with the analysis of short tandem repeat loci.

Authors:  Peter Gill; James Curran; Keith Elliot
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 8.  The National DNA Data Bank of Canada: a Quebecer perspective.

Authors:  Emmanuel Milot; Marie M J Lecomte; Hugo Germain; Frank Crispino
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  Evaluation of forensic DNA mixture evidence: protocol for evaluation, interpretation, and statistical calculations using the combined probability of inclusion.

Authors:  Frederick R Bieber; John S Buckleton; Bruce Budowle; John M Butler; Michael D Coble
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.797

10.  Resolving individuals contributing trace amounts of DNA to highly complex mixtures using high-density SNP genotyping microarrays.

Authors:  Nils Homer; Szabolcs Szelinger; Margot Redman; David Duggan; Waibhav Tembe; Jill Muehling; John V Pearson; Dietrich A Stephan; Stanley F Nelson; David W Craig
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 5.917

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.