Literature DB >> 15639168

Sweet and bitter tastes of alcoholic beverages mediate alcohol intake in of-age undergraduates.

Sarah A Lanier1, John E Hayes, Valerie B Duffy.   

Abstract

Alcoholic beverages are complex stimuli, giving rise to sensations that promote or inhibit intake. Previous research has shown associations between 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) bitterness, one marker of genetic variation in taste, and alcohol behaviors. We tested the PROP bitterness and alcohol intake relationship as mediated by tastes of sampled alcoholic beverages. Forty-nine undergraduates (mean age=22 years) participated. According to the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), only 3 of 49 subjects reported patterns indicating problematic drinking. Participants used the general Labeled Magnitude Scale to rate PROP bitterness and tastes from and preference for Pilsner beer, blended scotch whiskey, instant espresso and unsweetened grapefruit juice. Alcohol intake was reported over a typical week. Regression analysis tested the hypothesis that PROP bitterness influenced alcohol bitterness and sweetness, which in turn predicted alcohol intake. Those who tasted less PROP bitterness tasted all beverages as less bitter and more preferred. Sweetness of scotch was significantly greater in those who tasted PROP as least bitter. For scotch, greater sweetness and less bitterness from sampled scotch were direct predictors of greater alcohol intake. For beer, preference ratings were better predictors of alcohol intake than the bitter or sweet tastes of the sampled beer. These findings support that PROP bitterness predicts both positive and negative tastes from alcoholic beverages and that those tastes may predict alcohol intake. The college environment may attenuate direct effects of PROP bitterness and intake. Here, PROP bitterness does not predict alcohol intake directly, but acts instead through sweet and bitter tastes of alcoholic beverages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15639168     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  51 in total

Review 1.  Bitter and sweet taste receptors in the respiratory epithelium in health and disease.

Authors:  Robert J Lee; Noam A Cohen
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 4.599

2.  Allelic variation in TAS2R bitter receptor genes associates with variation in sensations from and ingestive behaviors toward common bitter beverages in adults.

Authors:  John E Hayes; Margaret R Wallace; Valerie S Knopik; Deborah M Herbstman; Linda M Bartoshuk; Valerie B Duffy
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Preference for sucralose predicts behavioral responses to sweet and bittersweet tastants.

Authors:  Gregory C Loney; Ann-Marie Torregrossa; Chris Carballo; Lisa A Eckel
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 4.  Psychophysics of sweet and fat perception in obesity: problems, solutions and new perspectives.

Authors:  Linda M Bartoshuk; Valerie B Duffy; John E Hayes; Howard R Moskowitz; Derek J Snyder
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Maximizing overall liking results in a superior product to minimizing deviations from ideal ratings: an optimization case study with coffee-flavored milk.

Authors:  Bangde Li; John E Hayes; Gregory R Ziegler
Journal:  Food Qual Prefer       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 5.565

6.  Fetal alcohol exposure reduces responsiveness of taste nerves and trigeminal chemosensory neurons to ethanol and its flavor components.

Authors:  John I Glendinning; Joyce Tang; Ana Paula Morales Allende; Bruce P Bryant; Lisa Youngentob; Steven L Youngentob
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Polymorphisms in TRPV1 and TAS2Rs associate with sensations from sampled ethanol.

Authors:  Alissa L Allen; John E McGeary; John E Hayes
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  Explaining variability in sodium intake through oral sensory phenotype, salt sensation and liking.

Authors:  John E Hayes; Bridget S Sullivan; Valerie B Duffy
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-04-07

9.  Characterizing and improving the sensory and hedonic responses to polyphenol-rich aronia berry juice.

Authors:  Valerie B Duffy; Shristi Rawal; Jeeha Park; Mark H Brand; Mastaneh Sharafi; Bradley W Bolling
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.868

10.  Wine Expertise Predicts Taste Phenotype.

Authors:  John E Hayes; Gary J Pickering
Journal:  Am J Enol Vitic       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.253

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.