Literature DB >> 29181693

Cost-effectiveness analysis of patient self-testing therapy of oral anticoagulation.

Sutat Kantito1, Surasak Saokaew2,3,4,5, Sukit Yamwong1, Prin Vathesatogkit1, Wisuit Katekao1, Piyamitr Sritara1, Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk6,7,8,9.   

Abstract

Patient Self-testing (PST) could be an option for present anticoagulation therapy monitoring, but current evidence on its cost-effectiveness is limited. This study aims to estimate the cost-effectiveness of PST to other different care approaches for anticoagulation therapy in Thailand, a low-to-middle income country (LMIC). A Markov model was used to compare lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) accrued to patients receiving warfarin through PST or either anticoagulation clinic (AC) or usual care (UC). The model was populated with relevant information from literature, network meta-analysis, and database analyses. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were presented as the year 2015 values. A base-case analysis was performed for patients at age 45-year-old. Sensitivity analyses including one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were constructed to determine the robustness of the findings. From societal perspective, PST increased QALY by 0.87 and costs by 112,461 THB compared with UC. Compared with AC, PST increased QALY by 0.161 and costs by 21,019 THB. The ICER with PST was 128,697 (3625 USD) and 130,493 THB (3676 USD) per QALY gained compared with UC and AC, respectively. The probability of PST being cost-effective is 74.1% and 51.9%, compared to UC and AC, respectively, in Thai context. Results were sensitive to the efficacy of PST, age and frequency of hospital visit or self-testing. This analysis suggested that PST is highly cost-effective compared with usual care and less cost-effective against anticoagulation clinic. Patient self-testing strategy appears to be economically valuable to include into healthcare system within the LMIC context.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anticoagulants; Bleeding; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Point-of-care; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29181693     DOI: 10.1007/s11239-017-1588-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis        ISSN: 0929-5305            Impact factor:   2.300


  49 in total

Review 1.  Advantages of using the net-benefit approach for analysing uncertainty in economic evaluation studies.

Authors:  Niklas Zethraeus; Magnus Johannesson; Bengt Jönsson; Mickael Löthgren; Magnus Tambour
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Patient self-management of anticoagulation therapy: a trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Sue Jowett; Stirling Bryan; Ellen Murray; Deborah McCahon; James Raftery; F D Richard Hobbs; David Fitzmaurice
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.998

3.  Anticoagulation clinics and patient self-testing for patients on chronic warfarin therapy: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  J E Lafata; S A Martin; S Kaatz; R E Ward
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Estimation of financial burden due to oversupply of medications for chronic diseases.

Authors:  Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk; Aekdisak Thanarungroj; Nonglak Cheewasithirungrueng; Warunee Srisupha-olarn; Piyarat Nimpitakpong; Piyameth Dilokthornsakul; Napawan Jeanpeerapong
Journal:  Asia Pac J Public Health       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 1.399

5.  Home prothrombin time monitoring after the initiation of warfarin therapy. A randomized, prospective study.

Authors:  R H White; S A McCurdy; H von Marensdorff; D E Woodruff; L Leftgoff
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-11-01       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Improving the outcomes of anticoagulation: an evaluation of home follow-up of warfarin initiation.

Authors:  S L Jackson; G M Peterson; J H Vial; D M L Jupe
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Comparison of INR stability between self-monitoring and standard laboratory method: preliminary results of a prospective study in 67 mechanical heart valve patients.

Authors:  Claire Dauphin; Benoît Legault; Patricia Jaffeux; Pascal Motreff; Kasra Azarnoush; Hélène Joly; Etienne Geoffroy; Bruno Aublet-Cuvelier; Lionel Camilleri; Jean-René Lusson; Jean Cassagnes; Charles de Riberolles
Journal:  Arch Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 2.340

8.  Is long-term pharmacist-managed anticoagulation service efficient? A pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lyne Lalonde; Josée Martineau; Normand Blais; Martine Montigny; Jeffrey Ginsberg; Martine Fournier; Djamal Berbiche; Marie-Claude Vanier; Lucie Blais; Sylvie Perreault; Isabel Rodrigues
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Comparison of the quality of oral anticoagulant therapy through patient self-management and management by specialized anticoagulation clinics in the Netherlands: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  A P A Gadisseur; W G M Breukink-Engbers; F J M van der Meer; A M H van den Besselaar; A Sturk; F R Rosendaal
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-11-24

10.  Quality of life after intracerebral hemorrhage: results of the Factor Seven for Acute Hemorrhagic Stroke (FAST) trial.

Authors:  Michael C Christensen; Stephan Mayer; Jean-Marc Ferran
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  1 in total

1.  Perspective and Costing in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis, 1974-2018.

Authors:  David D Kim; Madison C Silver; Natalia Kunst; Joshua T Cohen; Daniel A Ollendorf; Peter J Neumann
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.981

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.