Literature DB >> 15638101

Combined spatial, contrast, and temporal functions perimetry in mild glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

M González-Hernández1, J García-Feijoó, M Sanchez Mendez, M González de la Rosa.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic ability of a new perimetric procedure in glaucoma.
METHODS: Pulsar perimeter shows white circular sinusoidal grating patterns with decreasing amplitude, 5 degrees in diameter, 500 msec in duration in 66 locations. The stimuli scale combines spatial resolution and contrast. The stimuli were shown with centrifugal wave motion at 8 cyl/deg (K6W) or pulse at 30 Hz (T30W). Fifty-six normal eyes and 82 eyes with ocular hypertension and mild glaucoma were included. These 82 cases were classified into four levels of diagnostic certainty, from 0 (ocular hypertension) to 3 (mild glaucoma).
RESULTS: Mean examination time was 3:49 min. Specificity was 96.4% (T30W) and 94.6% (K6W). Sensitivities for levels 0 and 3 were 34.5% to 100% (T30W) and 24.1 % to 75% (K6W). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve areas for T30W at levels 1, 2, and 3 were 0.88, 0.94, and 0.99. The ROC areas for K6W were 0.83, 0.91, and 0.97. There was good correlation between both Pulsar perimetries (r=0.88), but it was lower with conventional perimetry (r=0.58 for T30W and r=0.59 for K6W).
CONCLUSIONS: The novel Pulsar T30W perimetry may be helpful for the study of mild glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15638101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1120-6721            Impact factor:   2.597


  11 in total

1.  [Importance of flicker contrast tests in functional glaucoma diagnostics].

Authors:  K Göbel; C M Poloschek; C Erb; M Bach
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  [Functional glaucoma diagnosis].

Authors:  C Erb; K Göbel
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  [Pulsar perimetry. A review and new results].

Authors:  M Gonzalez de la Rosa; M Gonzalez-Hernandez
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  [Sensitivity and specificity of flicker perimetry with Pulsar. Comparison with achromatic (white-on-white) perimetry in glaucoma patients].

Authors:  K Göbel; C Erb
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Modeling the relative influence of fixation and sampling errors on retest variability in perimetry.

Authors:  T Maddess
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Diagnostic capability of Pulsar perimetry in pre-perimetric and early glaucoma.

Authors:  Kazunori Hirasawa; Natsumi Takahashi; Kazuhiro Matsumura; Masayuki Kasahara; Nobuyuki Shoji
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Influence of ACPA-positive rheumatoid arthritis on visual field testing in patients with arterial hypertension: A comparative cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jascha Wendelstein; Barbara Fuchs; Sarah Schlittgen; Robert Zielke; Jeanette Brünner; Matthias Bolz; Rielke Alten; Carl Erb
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Comparison of size modulation and conventional standard automated perimetry with the 24-2 test protocol in glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Kazunori Hirasawa; Nobuyuki Shoji; Masayuki Kasahara; Kazuhiro Matsumura; Kimiya Shimizu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Comparison between the Correlations of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Visual Field Defects in Standard Automated White-on-White Perimetry versus Pulsar Perimetry.

Authors:  Maged Alnawaiseh; Lisann Hömberg; Nicole Eter; Verena Prokosch
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-08       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  The Diagnostic Value of Pulsar Perimetry, Optical Coherence Tomography, and Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Pre-Perimetric and Perimetric Glaucoma.

Authors:  Hung-Chih Chen; Michael Chia-Yen Chou; Ming-Tsung Lee; Chia-Yi Lee; Che-Ning Yang; Chin-Hsin Liu; Shih-Chun Chao
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.