Literature DB >> 15637748

CT and MR imaging for detecting neoplastic invasion of esophageal inlet.

Bin Chen1, Shan-Kai Yin, Qi-Xin Zhuang, Ying-Sheng Cheng.   

Abstract

AIM: Direct neoplastic invasion of esophageal inlet is an uncommon but significant sequela of advanced head and neck carcinomas. The aim of this study was to seek an optimal CT or MRI criterion for determining the neoplastic esophageal inlet involvement in order to help tumor staging and surgical planning.
METHODS: CT and MRI of 78 head and neck tumor cases were investigated retrospectively. At the level of the esophageal inlet on axial CT and MRI scans, the distance between the posterior aspect of cricoid cartilage and the anterior aspect of vertebra (d-CV) was measured by two senior radiologists who were unaware of clinical findings. Then, according to pathologic evidence and follow-up findings, these patients were divided into patient group, including 32 cases with neoplastic invasion of esophageal inlet and control group, including 46 cases without neoplastic esophageal inlet involvement. The statistical difference based on d-CV between the two groups was determined. The optimal criterion of d-CV on CT or MRI was assessed and its accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were evaluated respectively.
RESULTS: In control group, d-CV at the esophageal inlet level was 0.94+/-0.15 cm on axial CT and 0.91+/-0.18 cm on axial MRI, whereas in patient group, d-CV was 1.24+/-0.32 cm on CT and 1.31+/-0.36 cm on MRI. There was a statistical significance in d-CV between the two groups on CT and MRI modalities (P<0.01). d-CV greater than 1.0 cm was the typical feature of neoplastic invasion of the esophageal inlet with 73% sensitivity, 83% specificity, 79% accuracy, 76% PPV, 80% NPV on CT and 84% sensitivity, 77% specificity, 80% accuracy, 70% PPV, 88% NPV on MRI respectively.
CONCLUSION: Except for other CT and MR imaging features of neoplastic invasion of esophageal inlet, d-CV greater than 1.0 cm is an optimal adjunct criterion for esophageal inlet invasion by advanced head and neck carcinomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15637748      PMCID: PMC4205341          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i3.377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  30 in total

1.  Laparoscopic harvest of the jejunal free flap for reconstruction of hypopharyngeal and cervical esophageal defects.

Authors:  J Trad Wadsworth; Neal Futran; Thomas R Eubanks
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2002-12

2.  Problems in reconstructive surgery in the treatment of carcinoma of the hypopharyngoesophageal junction.

Authors:  M Bussi; V Ferrero; E Riontino; G Gasparri; M Camandona; G Cortesina
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Comparison between positron emission tomography and computed tomography in the use of the assessment of esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kato; Hiroyuki Kuwano; Masanobu Nakajima; Tatsuya Miyazaki; Minako Yoshikawa; Hitoshi Ojima; Katsuhiko Tsukada; Noboru Oriuchi; Tomio Inoue; Keigo Endo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Carcinoma of esophagus: radiologic diagnosis and staging.

Authors:  Basak Kumbasar
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 5.  Clinical staging of esophageal carcinoma. CT, EUS, and PET.

Authors:  T W Rice
Journal:  Chest Surg Clin N Am       Date:  2000-08

6.  Palliative gastric transposition following pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy.

Authors:  D J Azurin; L S Go; M L Kirkland
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 0.688

7.  Positron emission tomography for staging esophageal cancer: does it lead to a different therapeutic approach?

Authors:  Werner Kneist; Mathias Schreckenberger; Peter Bartenstein; Frank Grünwald; Katja Oberholzer; Theodor Junginger
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-08-18       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Superficial esophageal carcinoma: an in vitro study of high-resolution MR imaging at 1.5T.

Authors:  I Yamada; Y Izumi; T Kawano; N Yoshino; A Tetsumura; K Ohashi; H Shibuya
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  [Surgical treatment of advanced thyroid carcinoma with aero-digestive invasion].

Authors:  Jun-heng Ge; Rui-li Zhao; Jun-lan Hu; Wei-An Zhou
Journal:  Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2004-04

10.  Esophageal invasion by thyroid carcinomas: prediction using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jichen Wang; Shodayu Takashima; Tsuyoshi Matsushita; Fumiyoshi Takayama; Tetsuro Kobayashi; Masumi Kadoya
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Resectability issues with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  D M Yousem; K Gad; R P Tufano
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  [Radiological imaging of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Part 1. The esophagus].

Authors:  J Hansmann; L Grenacher
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 0.635

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.