Literature DB >> 10967751

Clinical staging of esophageal carcinoma. CT, EUS, and PET.

T W Rice1.   

Abstract

CT is readily available to all patients. It is relatively inexpensive and fees are usually reimbursed. It provides exquisite anatomic detail of the chest and abdomen in patients with esophageal cancer. The only reliable use of CT in the determination of T is the exclusion of T4 tumors, which is suggested by the preservation of fat planes. Enlarged lymph nodes are suspicious for metastatic disease but require further study or tissue sampling if nodal metastases will determine treatment. Its major use is in the detection of distant metastatic disease; however, 30% to 60% of distant metastases may be radiographically occult. There is a significant learning curve for EUS staging of esophageal cancer. It is suggested that this study be performed at institutions where there is a dedicated, experienced endoscopic ultrasonographer with adequate instrumentation that allows specialty imaging and EUS-FNA. EUS is the best means of clinically determining T. The addition of EUS-FNA to routine EUS evaluation of lymph nodes allows an accuracy similar to the EUS determination of T. EUS has no purpose in assessment of non-nodal distant metastatic disease; however, the serendipitous finding of distant metastases in adjacent structures visualized during the evaluation of the primary tumor and lymph nodes has, on occasion, detected M1b disease. FDG-PET represents an advance over CT scanning in the screening for distant metastases. The major problems with FDG-PET staging of esophageal cancer is failure to detect metastatic deposits less than 1 cm in diameter and lack of anatomic definition. It is unable to determine T and has been inaccurate in the detection of lymph node metastases. Because this test is not readily available, is expensive, and is not routinely reimbursed, its use in staging esophageal cancer continues to be limited. Today, CT and EUS are the mainstays in the clinical staging of esophageal carcinoma. When possible, FDG-PET should be added to CT to improve the evaluation of non-nodal M1b disease. Results of these studies should determine the necessity for invasive staging techniques and direct their use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10967751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest Surg Clin N Am        ISSN: 1052-3359


  33 in total

1.  The role of integrated F-18-FDG-PET scanning in the detection of M1 disease in oesophageal adenocarcinoma and impact on clinical management.

Authors:  Soumil Vyas; Sheraz R Markar; Lydia Iordanidou; Samantha Read; David Stoker; Majid Hashemi; Ian Mitchell; Mark Winslet; Jamshed Bomanji
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  The role of qualitative and quantitative analysis of F18-FDG positron emission tomography in predicting pathologic response following chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Tracy Klayton; Tianyu Li; Jian Q Yu; Lanea Keller; Jonathan Cheng; Steven J Cohen; Neal J Meropol; Walter Scott; Meng Xu-Welliver; Andre Konski
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2012-12

3.  Prospective comparison of MR with diffusion-weighted imaging, endoscopic ultrasound, MDCT and positron emission tomography-CT in the pre-operative staging of oesophageal cancer: results from a pilot study.

Authors:  Francesco Giganti; Alessandro Ambrosi; Maria C Petrone; Carla Canevari; Damiano Chiari; Annalaura Salerno; Paolo G Arcidiacono; Roberto Nicoletti; Luca Albarello; Elena Mazza; Francesca Gallivanone; Luigi Gianolli; Elena Orsenigo; Antonio Esposito; Carlo Staudacher; Alessandro Del Maschio; Francesco De Cobelli
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Use of Shear Wave Ultrasound Vibrometry for Detection of Simulated Esophageal Malignancy in Ex Vivo Porcine Esophagi.

Authors:  Johnathon M Aho; Ivan Z Nenadic; Sara Aristizabal; Dennis A Wigle; Daniel J Tschumperlin; Matthew W Urban
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2016-11-23

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for detection of suspected recurrence in patients with oesophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Punit Sharma; Sachin Jain; Sellam Karunanithi; Sujoy Pal; Pramod Kumar Julka; Sanjay Thulkar; Arun Malhotra; Chandrasekhar Bal; Rakesh Kumar
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  New approach to malignant strictures of the esophagus.

Authors:  Kulwinder S Dua
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2003-06

7.  Preoperative TN staging of esophageal cancer: comparison of miniprobe ultrasonography, spiral CT and MRI.

Authors:  Ling-Fei Wu; Bing-Zhou Wang; Jia-Lin Feng; Wei-Rong Cheng; Guo-Re Liu; Xiao-Hua Xu; Zhi-Chao Zheng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  State-of-the-art molecular imaging in esophageal cancer management: implications for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Jolinta Lin; Seth Kligerman; Rakhi Goel; Payam Sajedi; Mohan Suntharalingam; Michael D Chuong
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-02

9.  Correlation between endoscopic forceps biopsies and endoscopic mucosal resection with endoscopic ultrasound in patients with Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia and early cancer.

Authors:  Prashanthi N Thota; Alaa Sada; Madhusudhan R Sanaka; Sunguk Jang; Rocio Lopez; John R Goldblum; Xiuli Liu; John A Dumot; John Vargo; Gregory Zuccarro
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  PET/CT in oncology: for which tumours is it the reference standard?

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.