Literature DB >> 9128228

Palliative gastric transposition following pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy.

D J Azurin1, L S Go, M L Kirkland.   

Abstract

Extensive extirpative resection of advanced head and neck tumors followed by functional reconstruction is a formidable undertaking. Poor long-term survival and substantial morbidity and mortality have often conferred a nihilistic approach toward these patients. We reviewed our experience with transhiatal gastric transposition with pharyngogastric anastomosis for reconstruction of pharyngoesophageal defects to assess the value of undertaking such a formidable surgical intervention. A retrospective analysis (1990-1994) of 20 consecutive patients with advanced head and neck tumors who underwent pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy followed by transhiatal gastric transposition with pharyngogastric anastomosis was performed. Morbidity was 35 per cent; mortality was 10 per cent. Pharyngogastric leaks occurred in 10 per cent of patients. The median postoperative stay was 19 days. Ninety-four per cent of patients had good to excellent palliation. Follow-up averaged 14.3 months. Late stricture occurred in two patients that was easily amenable to dilatation. Tumor recurrence caused dysphagia in one patient; otherwise, all patients are swallowing well or have died without dysphagia. Gastric transposition without thoracotomy is a versatile and reliable method for reconstruction of large pharyngoesophageal defects and is associated with an acceptable morbidity and mortality, thus allowing good palliation in a patient population with an extremely poor prognosis and an otherwise poor quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9128228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  6 in total

1.  MR imaging for predicting neoplastic invasion of the cervical esophagus.

Authors:  S Roychowdhury; L A Loevner; D M Yousem; A Chalian; K T Montone
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Minimal invasive approach of gastric and esophageal mobilization in total pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy: total laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic technique.

Authors:  S K H Wong; A C W Chan; D W H Lee; E W H To; E K W Ng; S C S Chung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-17       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  CT and MR imaging for detecting neoplastic invasion of esophageal inlet.

Authors:  Bin Chen; Shan-Kai Yin; Qi-Xin Zhuang; Ying-Sheng Cheng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Radical resection or chemoradiotherapy for cervical esophageal cancer?

Authors:  Shah-Hwa Chou; Hsien-Pin Li; Jui-Ying Lee; Meei-Feng Huang; Chia-Hua Lee; Ka-Wo Lee
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Free jejunal graft for reconstruction of defects in the hypopharynx and cervical esophagus following the cancer resections.

Authors:  Dean Zhao; Xingqiang Gao; Limei Guan; Wenling Su; Jing Gao; Cunshan Liu; Xianyang Luo; Xiaoyan Li
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Management algorithm for failed gastric pull up reconstruction of laryngopharyngectomy defects: case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Oleksandr Butskiy; Donald W Anderson; Eitan Prisman
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-07-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.