BACKGROUND: Interventions to improve the fracture prevention in nursing homes are needed. METHODS: Cluster-randomized, single-blind, controlled trial of a multi-modal quality improvement intervention. Nursing homes (n=67) with > or =10 residents with a diagnosis of osteoporosis or recent hip fracture (n=606) were randomized to receive an early or delayed intervention consisting of audit and feedback, educational modules, teleconferences, and academic detailing. Medical record abstraction and the Minimum Data Set were used to measure the prescription of osteoporosis therapies before and after the intervention period. Analysis was at the facility-level and Generalized Estimating Equation modeling was used to account for clustering. RESULTS: No significant improvements were observed in any of the quality indicators. The use of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy or hip protectors improved by 8.0% in the intervention group and 0.6% in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P=.72). Participation in the intervention activities was low, but completion of the educational module (odds ratio [OR] 4.8, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-12.0) and direct physician contact by an academic detailer (OR 4.5, 95% CI, 1.1-18.2) were significantly associated with prescription of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy or hip protectors in multivariable models. CONCLUSIONS: Audit-feedback and education interventions were ineffective in improving fracture prevention in the nursing home setting, although results may have been tempered by low participation in the intervention activities.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Interventions to improve the fracture prevention in nursing homes are needed. METHODS: Cluster-randomized, single-blind, controlled trial of a multi-modal quality improvement intervention. Nursing homes (n=67) with > or =10 residents with a diagnosis of osteoporosis or recent hip fracture (n=606) were randomized to receive an early or delayed intervention consisting of audit and feedback, educational modules, teleconferences, and academic detailing. Medical record abstraction and the Minimum Data Set were used to measure the prescription of osteoporosis therapies before and after the intervention period. Analysis was at the facility-level and Generalized Estimating Equation modeling was used to account for clustering. RESULTS: No significant improvements were observed in any of the quality indicators. The use of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy or hip protectors improved by 8.0% in the intervention group and 0.6% in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P=.72). Participation in the intervention activities was low, but completion of the educational module (odds ratio [OR] 4.8, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-12.0) and direct physician contact by an academic detailer (OR 4.5, 95% CI, 1.1-18.2) were significantly associated with prescription of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy or hip protectors in multivariable models. CONCLUSIONS: Audit-feedback and education interventions were ineffective in improving fracture prevention in the nursing home setting, although results may have been tempered by low participation in the intervention activities.
Authors: Jeffrey R Curtis; Andrew O Westfall; Jeroan Allison; Angela Becker; Mary Elkins Melton; Allison Freeman; Catarina I Kiefe; Marilyn MacArthur; Theresa Ockershausen; Emily Stewart; Norm Weissman; Kenneth G Saag Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2007-03-26
Authors: Susan L Greenspan; Diane L Schneider; Michael R McClung; Paul D Miller; Thomas J Schnitzer; Randi Bonin; Mary Elizabeth Smith; Paul DeLucca; Glenn J Gormley; Mary E Melton Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2002-05-21 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Cathleen Colón-Emeric; Maragatha Kuchibhatla; Carl Pieper; William Hawkes; Lisa Fredman; Jay Magaziner; Sheryl Zimmerman; Kenneth W Lyles Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2003-10-03 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Ryan C Outman; Jeffrey R Curtis; Julie L Locher; Jeroan J Allison; Kenneth G Saag; Meredith L Kilgore Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2011-10-08 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Courtney C Kennedy; Lehana Thabane; George Ioannidis; Jonathan D Adachi; Alexandra Papaioannou Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2014-06-18 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Arthur N Lau; George Ioannidis; Yelena Potts; Lora M Giangregorio; Mary-Lou Van der Horst; Jonathan D Adachi; Alexandra Papaioannou Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2010-10-08 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Gustavo Duque; Stephen R Lord; Jenson Mak; Kirtan Ganda; Jacqueline J T Close; Peter Ebeling; Alexandra Papaioannou; Charles A Inderjeeth Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2016-06-24 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Louise Forsetlund; Arild Bjørndal; Arash Rashidian; Gro Jamtvedt; Mary Ann O'Brien; Fredric Wolf; Dave Davis; Jan Odgaard-Jensen; Andrew D Oxman Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2009-04-15
Authors: Amy H Warriner; Ryan C Outman; Elizabeth Kitchin; Lang Chen; Sarah Morgan; Kenneth G Saag; Jeffrey R Curtis Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 6.741