Literature DB >> 10697843

Are chromosomal inversions induced by transposable elements? A paradigm from the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae.

K D Mathiopoulos1, A della Torre, F Santolamazza, V Predazzi, V Petrarca, M Coluzzi.   

Abstract

Chromosomal rearrangements abound in nature and can be studied in detail in organisms with polytene chromosomes. In Drosophila and in Anopheline mosquitoes most speciation processes seem to be associated with the establishment of chromosomal rearrangements, particularly of paracentric inversions. It is not known what triggers inversions in natural populations. In the laboratory inversions are commonly generated by X-rays, mutagens or after the activity of certain transposable elements (TEs). The Anopheles gambiae complex is comprised of six sibling species, each one characterized by the presence of fixed paracentric inversions on their chromosomes. Two of these, An. gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis, are the most important vectors of human malaria and are structured into sub-populations, each carrying a characteristic set of polymorphic chromosomal inversions. We have cloned the breakpoints of the naturally occurring polymorphic inversion In(2R)d' of An. arabiensis. Analysis of the surrounding sequences demonstrated that adjacent to the distal breakpoint lies a transposable element that we called Odysseus. Characteristics of Odysseus' terminal region and its cytological distribution in different strains as well as within the same strain indicate that Odysseus is an actively transposing element. The presence of Odysseus at the junction of the naturally occurring inversion In(2R)d' suggests that the inversion may be the result of the TEs activity. Cytological evidence from Drosophila melanogaster has also implicated the hobo transposable element in the generation of certain Hawaiian endemic inversions. This picture supports the hypothesis of the important role of TEs in generating natural inversions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10697843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parassitologia        ISSN: 0048-2951


  7 in total

1.  Mitotic and polytene chromosomes analysis of the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae).

Authors:  Antigone Zacharopoulou; Antonios A Augustinos; Waheed A A Sayed; Alan S Robinson; Gerald Franz
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Comparative polytene chromosome maps of D. montana and D. virilis.

Authors:  Ramiro Morales-Hojas; Seliina Päällysaho; Cristina P Vieira; Anneli Hoikkala; Jorge Vieira
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2006-08-12       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Comparative genome sequencing of Drosophila pseudoobscura: chromosomal, gene, and cis-element evolution.

Authors:  Stephen Richards; Yue Liu; Brian R Bettencourt; Pavel Hradecky; Stan Letovsky; Rasmus Nielsen; Kevin Thornton; Melissa J Hubisz; Rui Chen; Richard P Meisel; Olivier Couronne; Sujun Hua; Mark A Smith; Peili Zhang; Jing Liu; Harmen J Bussemaker; Marinus F van Batenburg; Sally L Howells; Steven E Scherer; Erica Sodergren; Beverly B Matthews; Madeline A Crosby; Andrew J Schroeder; Daniel Ortiz-Barrientos; Catharine M Rives; Michael L Metzker; Donna M Muzny; Graham Scott; David Steffen; David A Wheeler; Kim C Worley; Paul Havlak; K James Durbin; Amy Egan; Rachel Gill; Jennifer Hume; Margaret B Morgan; George Miner; Cerissa Hamilton; Yanmei Huang; Lenée Waldron; Daniel Verduzco; Kerstin P Clerc-Blankenburg; Inna Dubchak; Mohamed A F Noor; Wyatt Anderson; Kevin P White; Andrew G Clark; Stephen W Schaeffer; William Gelbart; George M Weinstock; Richard A Gibbs
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Genome landscape and evolutionary plasticity of chromosomes in malaria mosquitoes.

Authors:  Ai Xia; Maria V Sharakhova; Scotland C Leman; Zhijian Tu; Jeffrey A Bailey; Christopher D Smith; Igor V Sharakhov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Chromosomal rearrangement inferred from comparisons of 12 Drosophila genomes.

Authors:  Arjun Bhutkar; Stephen W Schaeffer; Susan M Russo; Mu Xu; Temple F Smith; William M Gelbart
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-07-13       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  High-resolution comparative mapping among man, cattle and mouse suggests a role for repeat sequences in mammalian genome evolution.

Authors:  Laurent Schibler; Anne Roig; Marie-Françoise Mahe; Pascal Laurent; Hélène Hayes; François Rodolphe; Edmond P Cribiu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Phylogenetic signal from rearrangements in 18 Anopheles species by joint scaffolding extant and ancestral genomes.

Authors:  Yoann Anselmetti; Wandrille Duchemin; Eric Tannier; Cedric Chauve; Sèverine Bérard
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 3.969

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.