Literature DB >> 15631917

Assessing team performance in the operating room: development and use of a "black-box" recorder and other tools for the intraoperative environment.

Stephanie Guerlain1, Reid B Adams, F Beth Turrentine, Thomas Shin, Hui Guo, Stephen R Collins, J Forrest Calland.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this research was to develop a digital system to archive the complete operative environment along with the assessment tools for analysis of this data, allowing prospective studies of operative performance, intraoperative errors, team performance, and communication. Ability to study this environment will yield new insights, allowing design of systems to avoid preventable errors that contribute to perioperative complications. STUDY
DESIGN: A multitrack, synchronized, digital audio-visual recording system (RATE tool) was developed to monitor intraoperative performance, including software to synchronize data and allow assignment of independent observational scores. Cases were scored for technical performance, participants' situational awareness (knowledge of critical information), and their comfort and satisfaction with the conduct of the procedure.
RESULTS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 10) was studied. Technical performance of the RATE tool was excellent. The RATE tool allowed real time, multitrack data collection of all aspects of the operative environment, while permitting digital recording of the objective assessment data in a time synchronized and annotated fashion during the procedure. The mean technical performance score was 73% +/- 28% of maximum (perfect) performance. Situational awareness varied widely among team members, with the attending surgeon typically the only team member having comprehensive knowledge of critical case information.
CONCLUSIONS: The RATE tool allows prospective analysis of performance measures such as technical judgments, team performance, and communication patterns, offers the opportunity to conduct prospective intraoperative studies of human performance, and allows for postoperative discussion, review, and teaching. This study also suggests that gaps in situational awareness might be an underappreciated source of operative adverse events. Future uses of this system will aid teaching, failure or adverse event analysis, and intervention research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15631917     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.08.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  34 in total

1.  Surgeons' Leadership Styles and Team Behavior in the Operating Room.

Authors:  Yue-Yung Hu; Sarah Henrickson Parker; Stuart R Lipsitz; Alexander F Arriaga; Sarah E Peyre; Katherine A Corso; Emilie M Roth; Steven J Yule; Caprice C Greenberg
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Deconstructing intraoperative communication failures.

Authors:  Yue-Yung Hu; Alexander F Arriaga; Sarah E Peyre; Katherine A Corso; Emilie M Roth; Caprice C Greenberg
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  A laboratory study on anticipatory movement in laparoscopic surgery: a behavioral indicator for team collaboration.

Authors:  B Zheng; L L Swanström; C L MacKenzie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Problems with technical equipment during laparoscopic surgery. An observational study.

Authors:  E G G Verdaasdonk; L P S Stassen; M van der Elst; T M Karsten; J Dankelman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Implications of the law on video recording in clinical practice.

Authors:  Kirsten R Henken; Frank Willem Jansen; Jan Klein; Laurents P S Stassen; Jenny Dankelman; John J van den Dobbelsteen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  An evaluation of the feasibility, validity, and reliability of laparoscopic skills assessment in the operating room.

Authors:  Rajesh Aggarwal; Teodor Grantcharov; Krishna Moorthy; Thor Milland; Pavlos Papasavas; Aristotelis Dosis; Fernando Bello; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  The influence of non-technical performance on technical outcome in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A Mishra; K Catchpole; T Dale; P McCulloch
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Analysis of verbal communication during teaching in the operating room and the potentials for surgical training.

Authors:  E M Blom; E G G Verdaasdonk; L P S Stassen; H G Stassen; P A Wieringa; J Dankelman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  A quantitative study of disruption in the operating room during laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Danny V Martinec; Maria A Cassera; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Requirements for the structured recording of surgical device data in the digital operating room.

Authors:  Max Rockstroh; Stefan Franke; Thomas Neumuth
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 2.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.