Literature DB >> 19499960

Olmesartan medoxomil plus amlodipine increases efficacy in patients with moderate-to-severe hypertension after monotherapy: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre study.

Vivencio Barrios1, Peter Brommer2, Uwe Haag3, Alberto Calderón4, Carlos Escobar5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Hypertension remains a major global health problem, and evidence suggests that the majority of patients will require two or more antihypertensive agents in order to reach specified BP targets. Combining two drugs from different classes has the potential to target different aspects of hypertension, which may result in additional BP decreases compared with either agent used alone. This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre trial in patients with moderate-to-severe hypertension (systolic BP [SBP]/diastolic BP [DBP] > or =160/100 mmHg) investigated the additional efficacy in BP reduction and BP goal rates (<140/90 mmHg for patients without diabetes mellitus, <130/80 mmHg for patients with diabetes) achieved by adding amlodipine 5 or 10 mg/day to olmesartan medoxomil (hereafter olmesartan) 20 mg/day in patients not adequately controlled on olmesartan monotherapy.
METHODS: After 8 weeks' open-label olmesartan 20 mg monotherapy, 538 patients with SBP/DBP > or =140/90 mmHg were randomized to 8 weeks' double-blind therapy with olmesartan/placebo, olmesartan/amlodipine 20 mg/5 mg or olmesartan/amlodipine 20 mg/10 mg. This trial is registered on the www.clinicaltrials.gov website (NCT00220220).
RESULTS: After 8 weeks (with last observation carried forward), the adjusted mean change in seated DBP (SeDBP) from baseline was -7.6 mmHg for olmesartan/placebo, -10.4 mmHg for olmesartan/amlodipine 20 mg/5 mg (p = 0.0006 vs olmesartan/placebo) and -10.9 mmHg for olmesartan/amlodipine 20 mg/10 mg (p < 0.0001 vs olmesartan/placebo). Mean changes in SeSBP from baseline with olmesartan/amlodipine 20 mg/5 mg and olmesartan/amlodipine 20 mg/10 mg were -16.1 and -16.7 mmHg, respectively (p < 0.0001 for both dose regimens vs olmesartan/placebo). BP goal rates were significantly higher with olmesartan/amlodipine 20 mg/5 mg and olmesartan/amlodipine 20 mg/10 mg (44.5% and 45.8%, respectively; p = 0.0011 and p = 0.0004, respectively) versus olmesartan/placebo (28.5%). Combination therapy was well tolerated, and the incidence of drug-related adverse events was 8.9% for olmesartan/placebo, 7.7% for olmesartan/amlodipine 20 mg/5 mg, and 11.3% for olmesartan/amlodipine 20 mg/10 mg (p = 0.490). Most adverse events were mild in severity and were well known drug-class issues.
CONCLUSIONS: Combining olmesartan and amlodipine resulted in significantly greater BP lowering in patients not achieving adequate BP control with olmesartan monotherapy, thus allowing a significantly greater proportion of patients to achieve BP goal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19499960     DOI: 10.2165/00044011-200929070-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  44 in total

1.  Placebo-associated blood pressure response and adverse effects in the treatment of hypertension: observations from a Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study.

Authors:  R A Preston; B J Materson; D J Reda; D W Williams
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2000-05-22

2.  Effects of amlodipine and valsartan on oxidative stress and plasma methylarginines in end-stage renal disease patients on hemodialysis.

Authors:  S Aslam; T Santha; A Leone; C Wilcox
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 10.612

3.  Use of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to assess antihypertensive efficacy: a comparison of olmesartan medoxomil, losartan potassium, valsartan, and irbesartan.

Authors:  David H G Smith; Robert Dubiel; Michael Jones
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.571

Review 4.  Mitigation of calcium channel blocker-related oedema in hypertension by antagonists of the renin-angiotensin system.

Authors:  A de la Sierra
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 3.012

5.  Antiinflammatory effects of angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor blockade in hypertensive patients with microinflammation.

Authors:  Danilo Fliser; Konrad Buchholz; Hermann Haller
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-08-16       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Evaluation of antihypertensive therapy with the combination of olmesartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide.

Authors:  Steven G Chrysant; Michael A Weber; Antonia C Wang; Donald J Hinman
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.689

7.  Outcomes in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk treated with regimens based on valsartan or amlodipine: the VALUE randomised trial.

Authors:  Stevo Julius; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Michael Weber; Hans R Brunner; Steffan Ekman; Lennart Hansson; Tsushung Hua; John Laragh; Gordon T McInnes; Lada Mitchell; Francis Plat; Anthony Schork; Beverly Smith; Alberto Zanchetti
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-06-19       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Hypertension treatment and control in five European countries, Canada, and the United States.

Authors:  Katharina Wolf-Maier; Richard S Cooper; Holly Kramer; José R Banegas; Simona Giampaoli; Michel R Joffres; Neil Poulter; Paola Primatesta; Birgitta Stegmayr; Michael Thamm
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2003-11-24       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  The combination of olmesartan medoxomil and amlodipine besylate in controlling high blood pressure: COACH, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week factorial efficacy and safety study.

Authors:  Steven G Chrysant; Michael Melino; Sulekha Karki; James Lee; Reinilde Heyrman
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.393

10.  Efficacy of the combination of amlodipine and valsartan in patients with hypertension uncontrolled with previous monotherapy: the Exforge in Failure after Single Therapy (EX-FAST) study.

Authors:  Yves Allemann; Belen Fraile; Michel Lambert; Michaela Barbier; Philippe Ferber; Joseph L Izzo
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.738

View more
  17 in total

1.  Moderate versus intensive treatment of hypertension with amlodipine/valsartan for patients uncontrolled on angiotensin receptor blocker monotherapy.

Authors:  Suzanne Oparil; Thomas Giles; Elizabeth O Ofili; Bertram Pitt; Yodit Seifu; Robert Hilkert; Rita Samuel; James R Sowers
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.844

2.  Antihypertensive response to combination of olmesartan and amlodipine does not depend on method and time of drug administration.

Authors:  Francesco Rozza; Valentina Trimarco; Raffaele Izzo; Mario Santoro; Maria Virginia Manzi; Marina Marino; Gianfranco Di Renzo; Bruno Trimarco
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2013-05-09

Review 3.  Role of olmesartan in combination therapy in blood pressure control and vascular function.

Authors:  Carlos M Ferrario; Ronald D Smith
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2010-09-07

4.  Changes in Central Aortic Pressure, Endothelial Function and Biomarkers in Hypertensive African-Americans with the Cardiometabolic Syndrome: Comparison of Amlodipine/Olmesartan versus Hydrochlorothiazide/Losartan.

Authors:  Bobby V Khan; Nadya Merchant; Syed T Rahman; Mushtaq Ahmad; Janice M Parrott; Kanwal Umar; Julie Johnson; Keith C Ferdinand
Journal:  Cardiorenal Med       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 2.041

5.  Telmisartan and amlodipine single-pill combinations vs amlodipine monotherapy for superior blood pressure lowering and improved tolerability in patients with uncontrolled hypertension: results of the TEAMSTA-5 study.

Authors:  Steen Neldam; Margreet Lang; Russell Jones
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Daytime systolic ambulatory blood pressure with a two-step switch from candesartan to olmesartan monotherapy and the fixed-dose combination of olmesartan/amlodipine in patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension (SEVICONTROL-2).

Authors:  Peter Bramlage; Claudia Zemmrich; Andrea Gansz; Claus-Dieter Sturm; Rolf Fimmers; Jennifer Nadal; Roland E Schmieder; Joachim Schrader; Stephan Lüders
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Daytime systolic ambulatory blood pressure with a direct switch between candesartan monotherapy and the fixed-dose combination olmesartan/amlodipine in patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension (SEVICONTROL-1).

Authors:  Claudia Zemmrich; Stephan Lüders; Andrea Gansz; Claus-Dieter Sturm; Rolf Fimmers; Jennifer Nadal; Roland E Schmieder; Joachim Schrader; Peter Bramlage
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Effectiveness and tolerability of a fixed-dose combination of olmesartan and amlodipine in clinical practice.

Authors:  Peter Bramlage; Wolf-Peter Wolf; Thomas Stuhr; Eva-Maria Fronk; Wolfhard Erdlenbruch; Reinhard Ketelhut; Roland E Schmieder
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2010-09-07

Review 9.  Olmesartan/amlodipine: a review of its use in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  R Kreutz
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2011-03-29

Review 10.  Compliance with the treatment of hypertension: the potential of combination therapy.

Authors:  Serap Erdine
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.