Vivencio Barrios1, Peter Brommer2, Uwe Haag3, Alberto Calderón4, Carlos Escobar5. 1. Department of Cardiology, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Ctra., De Colmenar km 9, 100, 28034, Madrid, Spain. vbarriosa@meditex.es. 2. Gemeinschaftspraxis, Tann/Rhön, Germany. 3. HaaPACS GmbH, Schriesheim, Germany. 4. CS Rosa de Luxemburgo, San Sebastian de los Reyes (Madrid), Spain. 5. Department of Cardiology, Hospital Infanta Sofia, San Sebastian de los Reyes (Madrid), Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Hypertension remains a major global health problem, and evidence suggests that the majority of patients will require two or more antihypertensive agents in order to reach specified BP targets. Combining two drugs from different classes has the potential to target different aspects of hypertension, which may result in additional BP decreases compared with either agent used alone. This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre trial in patients with moderate-to-severe hypertension (systolic BP [SBP]/diastolic BP [DBP] > or =160/100 mmHg) investigated the additional efficacy in BP reduction and BP goal rates (<140/90 mmHg for patients without diabetes mellitus, <130/80 mmHg for patients with diabetes) achieved by adding amlodipine 5 or 10 mg/day to olmesartan medoxomil (hereafter olmesartan) 20 mg/day in patients not adequately controlled on olmesartan monotherapy. METHODS: After 8 weeks' open-label olmesartan 20 mg monotherapy, 538 patients with SBP/DBP > or =140/90 mmHg were randomized to 8 weeks' double-blind therapy with olmesartan/placebo, olmesartan/amlodipine 20 mg/5 mg or olmesartan/amlodipine 20 mg/10 mg. This trial is registered on the www.clinicaltrials.gov website (NCT00220220). RESULTS: After 8 weeks (with last observation carried forward), the adjusted mean change in seated DBP (SeDBP) from baseline was -7.6 mmHg for olmesartan/placebo, -10.4 mmHg for olmesartan/amlodipine 20 mg/5 mg (p = 0.0006 vs olmesartan/placebo) and -10.9 mmHg for olmesartan/amlodipine 20 mg/10 mg (p < 0.0001 vs olmesartan/placebo). Mean changes in SeSBP from baseline with olmesartan/amlodipine 20 mg/5 mg and olmesartan/amlodipine 20 mg/10 mg were -16.1 and -16.7 mmHg, respectively (p < 0.0001 for both dose regimens vs olmesartan/placebo). BP goal rates were significantly higher with olmesartan/amlodipine 20 mg/5 mg and olmesartan/amlodipine 20 mg/10 mg (44.5% and 45.8%, respectively; p = 0.0011 and p = 0.0004, respectively) versus olmesartan/placebo (28.5%). Combination therapy was well tolerated, and the incidence of drug-related adverse events was 8.9% for olmesartan/placebo, 7.7% for olmesartan/amlodipine 20 mg/5 mg, and 11.3% for olmesartan/amlodipine 20 mg/10 mg (p = 0.490). Most adverse events were mild in severity and were well known drug-class issues. CONCLUSIONS: Combining olmesartan and amlodipine resulted in significantly greater BP lowering in patients not achieving adequate BP control with olmesartan monotherapy, thus allowing a significantly greater proportion of patients to achieve BP goal.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:Hypertension remains a major global health problem, and evidence suggests that the majority of patients will require two or more antihypertensive agents in order to reach specified BP targets. Combining two drugs from different classes has the potential to target different aspects of hypertension, which may result in additional BP decreases compared with either agent used alone. This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre trial in patients with moderate-to-severe hypertension (systolic BP [SBP]/diastolic BP [DBP] > or =160/100 mmHg) investigated the additional efficacy in BP reduction and BP goal rates (<140/90 mmHg for patients without diabetes mellitus, <130/80 mmHg for patients with diabetes) achieved by adding amlodipine 5 or 10 mg/day to olmesartanmedoxomil (hereafter olmesartan) 20 mg/day in patients not adequately controlled on olmesartan monotherapy. METHODS: After 8 weeks' open-label olmesartan 20 mg monotherapy, 538 patients with SBP/DBP > or =140/90 mmHg were randomized to 8 weeks' double-blind therapy with olmesartan/placebo, olmesartan/amlodipine 20 mg/5 mg or olmesartan/amlodipine 20 mg/10 mg. This trial is registered on the www.clinicaltrials.gov website (NCT00220220). RESULTS: After 8 weeks (with last observation carried forward), the adjusted mean change in seated DBP (SeDBP) from baseline was -7.6 mmHg for olmesartan/placebo, -10.4 mmHg for olmesartan/amlodipine 20 mg/5 mg (p = 0.0006 vs olmesartan/placebo) and -10.9 mmHg for olmesartan/amlodipine 20 mg/10 mg (p < 0.0001 vs olmesartan/placebo). Mean changes in SeSBP from baseline with olmesartan/amlodipine 20 mg/5 mg and olmesartan/amlodipine 20 mg/10 mg were -16.1 and -16.7 mmHg, respectively (p < 0.0001 for both dose regimens vs olmesartan/placebo). BP goal rates were significantly higher with olmesartan/amlodipine 20 mg/5 mg and olmesartan/amlodipine 20 mg/10 mg (44.5% and 45.8%, respectively; p = 0.0011 and p = 0.0004, respectively) versus olmesartan/placebo (28.5%). Combination therapy was well tolerated, and the incidence of drug-related adverse events was 8.9% for olmesartan/placebo, 7.7% for olmesartan/amlodipine 20 mg/5 mg, and 11.3% for olmesartan/amlodipine 20 mg/10 mg (p = 0.490). Most adverse events were mild in severity and were well known drug-class issues. CONCLUSIONS: Combining olmesartan and amlodipine resulted in significantly greater BP lowering in patients not achieving adequate BP control with olmesartan monotherapy, thus allowing a significantly greater proportion of patients to achieve BP goal.
Authors: Stevo Julius; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Michael Weber; Hans R Brunner; Steffan Ekman; Lennart Hansson; Tsushung Hua; John Laragh; Gordon T McInnes; Lada Mitchell; Francis Plat; Anthony Schork; Beverly Smith; Alberto Zanchetti Journal: Lancet Date: 2004-06-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Katharina Wolf-Maier; Richard S Cooper; Holly Kramer; José R Banegas; Simona Giampaoli; Michel R Joffres; Neil Poulter; Paola Primatesta; Birgitta Stegmayr; Michael Thamm Journal: Hypertension Date: 2003-11-24 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Suzanne Oparil; Thomas Giles; Elizabeth O Ofili; Bertram Pitt; Yodit Seifu; Robert Hilkert; Rita Samuel; James R Sowers Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: Francesco Rozza; Valentina Trimarco; Raffaele Izzo; Mario Santoro; Maria Virginia Manzi; Marina Marino; Gianfranco Di Renzo; Bruno Trimarco Journal: High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev Date: 2013-05-09
Authors: Bobby V Khan; Nadya Merchant; Syed T Rahman; Mushtaq Ahmad; Janice M Parrott; Kanwal Umar; Julie Johnson; Keith C Ferdinand Journal: Cardiorenal Med Date: 2013-10-02 Impact factor: 2.041
Authors: Peter Bramlage; Claudia Zemmrich; Andrea Gansz; Claus-Dieter Sturm; Rolf Fimmers; Jennifer Nadal; Roland E Schmieder; Joachim Schrader; Stephan Lüders Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2013-11-08 Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: Claudia Zemmrich; Stephan Lüders; Andrea Gansz; Claus-Dieter Sturm; Rolf Fimmers; Jennifer Nadal; Roland E Schmieder; Joachim Schrader; Peter Bramlage Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2013-09-16 Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: Peter Bramlage; Wolf-Peter Wolf; Thomas Stuhr; Eva-Maria Fronk; Wolfhard Erdlenbruch; Reinhard Ketelhut; Roland E Schmieder Journal: Vasc Health Risk Manag Date: 2010-09-07