Literature DB >> 15630561

Validation of the GROMOS force-field parameter set 45Alpha3 against nuclear magnetic resonance data of hen egg lysozyme.

T A Soares1, X Daura, C Oostenbrink, L J Smith, W F van Gunsteren.   

Abstract

The quality of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of proteins depends critically on the biomolecular force field that is used. Such force fields are defined by force-field parameter sets, which are generally determined and improved through calibration of properties of small molecules against experimental or theoretical data. By application to large molecules such as proteins, a new force-field parameter set can be validated. We report two 3.5 ns molecular dynamics simulations of hen egg white lysozyme in water applying the widely used GROMOS force-field parameter set 43Alpha1 and a new set 45Alpha3. The two MD ensembles are evaluated against NMR spectroscopic data NOE atom-atom distance bounds, (3)J(NHalpha) and (3)J(alphabeta) coupling constants, and (15)N relaxation data. It is shown that the two sets reproduce structural properties about equally well. The 45Alpha3 ensemble fulfills the atom-atom distance bounds derived from NMR spectroscopy slightly less well than the 43Alpha1 ensemble, with most of the NOE distance violations in both ensembles involving residues located in loops or flexible regions of the protein. Convergence patterns are very similar in both simulations atom-positional root-mean-square differences (RMSD) with respect to the X-ray and NMR model structures and NOE inter-proton distances converge within 1.0-1.5 ns while backbone (3)J(HNalpha)-coupling constants and (1)H-(15)N order parameters take slightly longer, 1.0-2.0 ns. As expected, side-chain (3)J(alphabeta)-coupling constants and (1)H-(15)N order parameters do not reach full convergence for all residues in the time period simulated. This is particularly noticeable for side chains which display rare structural transitions. When comparing each simulation trajectory with an older and a newer set of experimental NOE data on lysozyme, it is found that the newer, larger, set of experimental data agrees as well with each of the simulations. In other words, the experimental data converged towards the theoretical result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15630561     DOI: 10.1007/s10858-004-5430-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol NMR        ISSN: 0925-2738            Impact factor:   2.835


  26 in total

1.  Molecular dynamics simulation of hen egg white lysozyme: a test of the GROMOS96 force field against nuclear magnetic resonance data.

Authors:  U Stocker; W F van Gunsteren
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-07-01

2.  The Key to Solving the Protein-Folding Problem Lies in an Accurate Description of the Denatured State Financial support from the Schweizerischer Nationalfonds (Project no. 21-50929.97) is gratefully acknowledged.

Authors:  Wilfred F. van Gunsteren; Roland Bürgi; Christine Peter; Xavier Daura
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 3.  Unfolded state of peptides.

Authors:  Xavier Daura; Alice Glättli; Peter Gee; Christine Peter; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem       Date:  2002

4.  A refined solution structure of hen lysozyme determined using residual dipolar coupling data.

Authors:  H Schwalbe; S B Grimshaw; A Spencer; M Buck; J Boyd; C M Dobson; C Redfield; L J Smith
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 5.  Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules.

Authors:  Martin Karplus; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2002-09

6.  Recommendations for the presentation of NMR structures of proteins and nucleic acids. IUPAC-IUBMB-IUPAB Inter-Union Task Group on the Standardization of Data Bases of Protein and Nucleic Acid Structures Determined by NMR Spectroscopy.

Authors:  J L Markley; A Bax; Y Arata; C W Hilbers; R Kaptein; B D Sykes; P E Wright; K Wüthrich
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.835

7.  Molecular dynamics of native protein. I. Computer simulation of trajectories.

Authors:  M Levitt
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1983-08-15       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Pseudo-structures for the 20 common amino acids for use in studies of protein conformations by measurements of intramolecular proton-proton distance constraints with nuclear magnetic resonance.

Authors:  K Wüthrich; M Billeter; W Braun
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1983-10-05       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Structural determinants of protein dynamics: analysis of 15N NMR relaxation measurements for main-chain and side-chain nuclei of hen egg white lysozyme.

Authors:  M Buck; J Boyd; C Redfield; D A MacKenzie; D J Jeenes; D B Archer; C M Dobson
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1995-03-28       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Comparison of MD simulations and NMR experiments for hen lysozyme. Analysis of local fluctuations, cooperative motions, and global changes.

Authors:  L J Smith; A E Mark; C M Dobson; W F van Gunsteren
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1995-08-29       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  25 in total

1.  Membrane protein dynamics in different environments: simulation study of the outer membrane protein X in a lipid bilayer and in a micelle.

Authors:  Alexandra Choutko; Alice Glättli; César Fernández; Christian Hilty; Kurt Wüthrich; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 1.733

2.  Effect of computational methodology on the conformational dynamics of the protein photosensor LOV1 from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.

Authors:  Emanuel Peter; Bernhard Dick; Stephan A Baeurle
Journal:  J Chem Biol       Date:  2011-03-11

3.  Residual dipolar couplings: are multiple independent alignments always possible?

Authors:  Victoria A Higman; Jonathan Boyd; Lorna J Smith; Christina Redfield
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 2.835

4.  Validation of the 53A6 GROMOS force field.

Authors:  Chris Oostenbrink; Thereza A Soares; Nico F A van der Vegt; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 1.733

5.  Molecular dynamics and protein function.

Authors:  M Karplus; J Kuriyan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Importance of the CMAP correction to the CHARMM22 protein force field: dynamics of hen lysozyme.

Authors:  Matthias Buck; Sabine Bouguet-Bonnet; Richard W Pastor; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-12-16       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters.

Authors:  Viktor Hornak; Robert Abel; Asim Okur; Bentley Strockbine; Adrian Roitberg; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-11-15

8.  Structural analysis of protein dynamics by MD simulations and NMR spin-relaxation.

Authors:  Nikola Trbovic; Byungchan Kim; Richard A Friesner; Arthur G Palmer
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-05-01

9.  Molecular dynamics simulations of the native and partially folded states of ubiquitin: influence of methanol cosolvent, pH, and temperature on the protein structure and dynamics.

Authors:  David B Kony; Philippe H Hünenberger; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Influence of NH-Sgamma bonding interactions on the structure and dynamics of metallothioneins.

Authors:  Núria Romero-Isart; Baldo Oliva; Milan Vasák
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 1.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.