Literature DB >> 10813839

Molecular dynamics simulation of hen egg white lysozyme: a test of the GROMOS96 force field against nuclear magnetic resonance data.

U Stocker1, W F van Gunsteren.   

Abstract

Biomolecular force fields for use in molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of proteins, DNA, or membranes are generally parametrized against ab initio quantum-chemical and experimental data for small molecules. The application of a force field in a simulation of a biomolecular system, such as a protein in solution, may then serve as a test of the quality and transferability of the force field. Here, we compare various properties obtained from two MD simulations of the protein hen egg white lysozyme (HEWL) in aqueous solution using the latest version, GROMOS96, of the GROMOS force field and an earlier version, GROMOS87+, with data derived from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments: NOE atom-atom distance bounds, (3)J(HNalpha)-coupling constants, and backbone and side-chain order parameters. The convergence of these quantities over a 2-ns period is considered, and converged values are compared to experimental ones. The GROMOS96 simulation shows better agreement with the NMR data and also with the X-ray crystal structure of HEWL than the GROMOS87+ simulation, which was based on an earlier version of the GROMOS force field. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10813839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  22 in total

1.  Dielectric properties of proteins from simulation: the effects of solvent, ligands, pH, and temperature.

Authors:  J W Pitera; M Falta; W F van Gunsteren
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Dynamic molecules: molecular dynamics for everyone. An internet-based access to molecular dynamic simulations: basic concepts.

Authors:  Martin Frank; Peter Gutbrod; Chokri Hassayoun; Claus-W von Der Lieth
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2003-08-08       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  Modeling the backbone dynamics of reduced and oxidized solvated rat microsomal cytochrome b5.

Authors:  Andrea Giachetti; Giovanni La La Penna; Angelo Perico; Lucia Banci
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Validation of the GROMOS force-field parameter set 45Alpha3 against nuclear magnetic resonance data of hen egg lysozyme.

Authors:  T A Soares; X Daura; C Oostenbrink; L J Smith; W F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.835

5.  Validation of the 53A6 GROMOS force field.

Authors:  Chris Oostenbrink; Thereza A Soares; Nico F A van der Vegt; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 1.733

6.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters.

Authors:  Viktor Hornak; Robert Abel; Asim Okur; Bentley Strockbine; Adrian Roitberg; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-11-15

7.  Starting structure dependence of NMR order parameters derived from MD simulations: implications for judging force-field quality.

Authors:  Alrun N Koller; Harald Schwalbe; Holger Gohlke
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Time-averaged order parameter restraints in molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Niels Hansen; Fabian Heller; Nathan Schmid; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 2.835

9.  A molecular simulation study of the protection of insulin bioactive structure by trehalose.

Authors:  Daixi Li; Li Liu; Huaxing Yu; Zhen Zhai; Yan Zhang; Baisong Guo; Chunsheng Yang; Baolin Liu
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 1.810

10.  Modeling the ternary complex TCR-Vbeta/CollagenII(261-273)/HLA-DR4 associated with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Maria Cristina De Rosa; Bruno Giardina; Caterina Bianchi; Cristiana Carelli Alinovi; Davide Pirolli; Gianfranco Ferraccioli; Maria De Santis; Gabriele Di Sante; Francesco Ria
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.