Literature DB >> 15623881

The variation in biological effectiveness of X-rays and gamma rays with energy.

M A Hill1.   

Abstract

The ICRP has attributed the same relative risk for all low-LET (linear energy transfer) radiations, including X and gamma radiations of all energies. However, very low energy X-rays are expected to be more biologically effective, per unit absorbed dose, than high energy X-rays or gamma rays due to the production of lower energy secondary electrons, with a correspondingly higher LET. This increase in relative biological effectiveness (RBE) is also seen experimentally for a range of biological end-points, however, a wide range of RBE values have been reported. The assessment of risks is particularly important due to the use of low energy X-rays for mammography screening. A review of the published data on the variation in biological effectiveness with energy is presented here.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15623881     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nch091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  23 in total

1.  FISH-based analysis of 10- and 25-kV soft X-ray-induced DNA damage in 184A1 human mammary epithelial cells.

Authors:  E Beyreuther; W Dörr; A Lehnert; E Lessmann; J Pawelke
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Quantification of the 2-deoxyribonolactone and nucleoside 5'-aldehyde products of 2-deoxyribose oxidation in DNA and cells by isotope-dilution gas chromatography mass spectrometry: differential effects of gamma-radiation and Fe2+-EDTA.

Authors:  Wan Chan; Bingzi Chen; Lianrong Wang; Koli Taghizadeh; Michael S Demott; Peter C Dedon
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  RBE of 25 kV X-rays for the survival and induction of micronuclei in the human mammary epithelial cell line MCF-12A.

Authors:  Anna Lehnert; Elisabeth Lessmann; Jörg Pawelke; Wolfgang Dörr
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Relative biological effectiveness of 25 and 10 kV X-rays for the induction of chromosomal aberrations in two human mammary epithelial cell lines.

Authors:  Elke Beyreuther; Wolfgang Dörr; Anna Lehnert; Elisabeth Lessmann; Jörg Pawelke
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Absolute measurements of radiation damage in nanometer-thick films.

Authors:  Elahe Alizadeh; Léon Sanche
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 0.972

6.  The potential impact of ultrathin filter design on dosimetry and relative biological effectiveness in modern image-guided small animal irradiators.

Authors:  Yannick Poirier; Christopher Daniel Johnstone; Charles Kirkby
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Investigating Dependencies of Relative Biological Effectiveness for Proton Therapy in Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Michelle E Howard; Chris Beltran; Sarah Anderson; Wan Chan Tseung; Jann N Sarkaria; Michael G Herman
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-03-21

8.  Gene expression changes and DNA damage after ex vivo exposure of peripheral blood cells to various CT photon spectra.

Authors:  Hanns Leonhard Kaatsch; Benjamin Valentin Becker; Simone Schüle; Patrick Ostheim; Kai Nestler; Julia Jakobi; Barbara Schäfer; Thomas Hantke; Marc A Brockmann; Michael Abend; Stephan Waldeck; Matthias Port; Harry Scherthan; Reinhard Ullmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Incorporating oxygenation levels in analytical DNA-damage models-quantifying the oxygen fixation mechanism.

Authors:  Frank Van den Heuvel; Anna Vella; Francesca Fiorini; Mark Brooke; Mark A Hill; Tim Maughan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  USP9X Is Required to Maintain Cell Survival in Response to High-LET Radiation.

Authors:  Catherine M Nickson; Maria Rita Fabbrizi; Rachel J Carter; Jonathan R Hughes; Andrzej Kacperek; Mark A Hill; Jason L Parsons
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.