Literature DB >> 15623445

Positron emission tomography with F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in a combined staging strategy of esophageal cancer prevents unnecessary surgical explorations.

Henderik L van Westreenen1, Pierre A M Heeren, Hendrik M van Dullemen, Eric J van der Jagt, Pieter L Jager, Henk Groen, John Th M Plukker.   

Abstract

Distant metastases or local invasion are frequently found during the explorative phase of surgery for esophageal cancer. This study was performed to determine the rate of patients with incurable disease encountered during exploration and to examine the impact of preoperative staging, including positron emission tomography (PET), on the number of unnecessary explorations. The records of 203 patients with esophageal cancer who were eligible for curative resection were retrospectively reviewed. The surgical reports were analyzed to obtain the reasons for abandoning resection. Furthermore, the different staging modalities according to the related time interval were reviewed for each patient to analyze the influence of them on the number of explorations. After exploratory surgery, resection was abandoned in 78 of the 203 patients (38%) because of distant metastases (n=59; 29%), metastatic spread and local irresectability (n=5; 2%), and local irresectability (n=14; 7%). In a logistic regression model with all preoperative staging modalities and the year of examination as independent variables, F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET) was the only modality that predicts intended curative resection in these patients (P<0.001). In patients with esophageal cancer who are suitable for potentially curative surgery, resection was abandoned mainly because of distant metastases encountered during exploration. The addition of FDG-PET may have reduced the rate of unnecessary surgery in this group of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15623445     DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2004.09.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  31 in total

1.  Endoscopic ultrasonography in the preoperative staging of adenocarcinoma of the distal oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction.

Authors:  J T Salminen; M A Färkkilä; O J Rämö; V Toikkanen; J Simpanen; H Nuutinen; J A Salo
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.423

2.  Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J B Hulscher; J G Tijssen; H Obertop; J J van Lanschot
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Predictors of survival for esophageal cancer patients with and without celiac axis lymphadenopathy: impact of staging endosonography.

Authors:  M A Eloubeidi; M B Wallace; B J Hoffman; M B Leveen; A Van Velse; R H Hawes; C E Reed
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 4.  Staging esophageal carcinoma II: CT and MRI.

Authors:  W M Thompson; R A Halvorsen
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.929

5.  Relation between endoscopic ultrasound findings and outcome of patients with tumors of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction.

Authors:  M Hiele; P De Leyn; P Schurmans; A Lerut; S Huys; K Geboes; A M Gevers; P Rutgeerts
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Esophagogastrectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and cardia: a comparison of findings and results after standard resection in three consecutive eight-year intervals with improved staging criteria.

Authors:  F H Ellis; G J Heatley; M J Krasna; W A Williamson; K Balogh
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Utility of positron emission tomography for the staging of patients with potentially operable esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  P Flamen; A Lerut; E Van Cutsem; W De Wever; M Peeters; S Stroobants; P Dupont; G Bormans; M Hiele; P De Leyn; D Van Raemdonck; W Coosemans; N Ectors; K Haustermans; L Mortelmans
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Carcinoma of esophagus: radiologic diagnosis and staging.

Authors:  Basak Kumbasar
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 9.  Clinical staging of esophageal carcinoma. CT, EUS, and PET.

Authors:  T W Rice
Journal:  Chest Surg Clin N Am       Date:  2000-08

10.  Multiport staging laparoscopy in esophageal and cardiac carcinoma.

Authors:  K V Menon; T C B Dehn
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.429

View more
  18 in total

1.  The role of integrated F-18-FDG-PET scanning in the detection of M1 disease in oesophageal adenocarcinoma and impact on clinical management.

Authors:  Soumil Vyas; Sheraz R Markar; Lydia Iordanidou; Samantha Read; David Stoker; Majid Hashemi; Ian Mitchell; Mark Winslet; Jamshed Bomanji
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Significant clinical impact and prognostic stratification provided by FDG-PET in the staging of oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Cuong P Duong; Helen Demitriou; Leann Weih; Anne Thompson; David Williams; Robert J S Thomas; Rodney J Hicks
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), positron emission tomography (PET), and computed tomography (CT) in the preoperative locoregional staging of resectable esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Jeongmin Choi; Sang Gyun Kim; Joo Sung Kim; Hyun Chae Jung; In Sung Song
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Role of endoscopic ultrasound in gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Biswanath P Gouda; Tarun Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 0.656

5.  2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging evaluation of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar; Robert W Henderson; Peter S Conti
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Clinical significance of incidental pulmonary nodules in esophageal cancer patients.

Authors:  Amin Madani; Jonathan Spicer; Thierry Alcindor; Marc David; Marie Vanhuyse; Jamil Asselah; David Mulder; Lorenzo Ferri
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Endoscopic ultrasonography in esophageal cancer leads to improved survival rates: results from a population-based study.

Authors:  Sachin Wani; Ananya Das; Amit Rastogi; Jennifer Drahos; Winifred Ricker; Ruth Parsons; Ajay Bansal; Roy Yen; Lindsay Hosford; Meghan Jankowski; Prateek Sharma; Michael B Cook
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  18FDG uptake in oesophageal adenocarcinoma: linking biology and outcome.

Authors:  Marinke Westerterp; Gerrit W Sloof; Otto S Hoekstra; Fiebo J W Ten Kate; Gerrit A Meijer; Johannes B Reitsma; Ronald Boellaard; J Jan B van Lanschot; Carla F M Molthoff
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  Patients' perception of diagnostic tests in the preoperative assessment of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Marinke Westerterp; Henderik L van Westreenen; Marije Deutekom; Jaap Stoker; Paul Fockens; Emile Fi Comans; John Tm Plukker; Patrick Mm Bossuyt; J Jan B van Lanschot; Gerrit W Sloof
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 2.711

10.  Detection of lymph node metastases with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in oesophageal cancer: a feasibility study.

Authors:  B B Pultrum; E J van der Jagt; H L van Westreenen; H M van Dullemen; P Kappert; H Groen; J Sietsma; M Oudkerk; J Th M Plukker; G M van Dam
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.