Literature DB >> 15622576

Reinterventions after complicated or failed stapled hemorrhoidopexy.

L Brusciano1, S M Ayabaca, M Pescatori, G M Accarpio, G Dodi, F Cavallari, B Ravo, R Annibali.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stapled hemorrhoidopexy has become increasingly popular over the past five years, mainly because of the assumption that it is associated with less pain. However, persistent tags and recurrence might represent a problem, because piles are not excised and severe complications requiring surgery have been occasionally reported. The aim of the present study is to analyze the causes for and the outcome of reintervention following either severely complicated or failed stapled hemorrhoidopexy.
METHODS: A total of 232 primary stapled hemorrhoidopexies and 65 reinterventions after stapled hemorrhoidopexy were performed by the authors in five centers devoted to colorectal surgery. Twelve patients of the latter group had the stapled hemorrhoidopexy performed in one of these centers. Thirty-five were males and 30 were females. The mean age was 50 (range, 29-81) years. In all cases the primary indication for stapled hemorrhoidopexy was either third-degree or fourth-degree symptomatic hemorrhoids. In all patients submitted to reoperation the diagnosis of either severely complicated or failed stapled hemorrhoidopexy was made. The clinical history of all of these patients was carefully studied and all underwent inspection, digital exploration, and proctoscopy. After the reintervention, proctoscopy was performed in 61 patients (92 percent) after a median follow-up of 5.5 (range, 1-36) months.
RESULTS: Our reoperation rate after stapled hemorrhoidopexy was 11 percent. The most frequent indications for reintervention were persistent, severe anal pain (visual analog pain score higher than 7) in 29 patients (45 percent), severe postoperative bleeding in 20 (31 percent), anal fissure in 16 (21 percent), prolapsing piles in 12 (18 percent), rectal polyp in 11 (16 percent), anorectal sepsis in 11 (16 percent), and fecal incontinence in 7 (11 percent). Thirteen different types of reintervention were needed. Excisional hemorrhoidectomy, removal of staples, and fissurectomy and/or internal sphincterotomy were the most frequent operation (n = 41). A decrease in anal pain, as measured by visual analog pain score, was observed one month after reintervention, compared with that measured preoperatively (from 5.6 +/- 3.6 to 3.0 +/- 2.9) (P < 0.001). Bleeding requiring treatment occurred in six cases (10 percent), anal stricture requiring dilation occurred in three (5 percent), and fecal incontinence in three (5 percent). Proctoscopy showed no recurrences in 52 cases (80 percent) after the reintervention.
CONCLUSION: Pain and bleeding mostly caused by piles, fissures, and retained staples were the most frequent causes for reoperation after stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Reintervention was associated with a high bleeding and soiling rate, but was effective in treating pain and other symptoms in the majority of patients. Because of the wide spectrum of different interventions required, a failed or complicated stapled hemorrhoidopexy might be better treated by an experienced colorectal surgeon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15622576     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-0721-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  36 in total

1.  Persistent anal and pelvic floor pain after PPH and STARR: surgical management of the fixed scar staple line.

Authors:  Claudia Menconi; Bernardina Fabiani; Iacopo Giani; Jacopo Martellucci; Gianluca Toniolo; Gabriele Naldini
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  [Intraoperative pitfalls and complications in defecation disorders and rectal prolapse].

Authors:  J Buhr; M W Hoffmann; E H Allemeyer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Stapled hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Michael J Stamos
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Severe rectal bleeding following PPH-stapler procedure for haemorroidal disease.

Authors:  M Ammendola; Giulio Sammarco; A Carpino; F Ferrari; G Vescio; R Sacco
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

5.  Surgical treatment of recurrent prolapse after stapled haemorrhoidopexy.

Authors:  F Selvaggi; G Pellino; G Sciaudone
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Agraffectomy after low rectal stapling procedures for hemorrhoids and rectocele.

Authors:  M Pescatori; G Gagliardi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Stapled anopexy and STARR in surgical treatment of haemorrhoidal disease.

Authors:  Italo Corsale; Marco Rigutini; Niccolò Francioli; Sonia Panicucci; Pietro Adriano Mori; Francesco Aloise
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2014-04-27

8.  Hemorrhoids.

Authors:  Amy Halverson
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-05

Review 9.  Pelvic sepsis after stapled hemorrhoidopexy.

Authors:  Remco-Ja van Wensen; Maarten-H van Leuken; Koop Bosscha
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Long-term results after stapled hemorrhoidopexy: a survey study with mean follow-up of 12 years.

Authors:  A Sturiale; B Fabiani; C Menconi; D Cafaro; F Fusco; G Bellio; M Schiano di Visconte; G Naldini
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.