Literature DB >> 24957359

Surgical treatment of recurrent prolapse after stapled haemorrhoidopexy.

F Selvaggi1, G Pellino, G Sciaudone.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recurrent prolapse after stapled haemorrhoidopexy is a late complication of the procedure which can present with accompanying symptoms and may require surgery. We describe a technique for treating symptomatic patients, aimed at obtaining remission of symptoms and avoiding recurrences.
METHODS: After excisional haemorrhoidectomy, a transverse incision is performed on the proximal part of the mucocutaneous bridge, above the plane of the internal sphincter. A flap of anal mucosa is gently raised. Haemorrhoidal tissue is not removed. LigaSure™ may be useful in focussing coagulation and reducing heat diffusion. Denudation of the internal sphincter allows the removal of potential retained staples. Then, stitches are placed between the proximal part of the flap and the proximal divided edge of the rectal mucosa. Excessive devascularisation of the flap must be avoided.
RESULTS: From January 2007 to January 2011, we treated 11 patients. The procedures lasted a mean of 38.2 ± 11.1 min. One patient (9 %) suffered from bleeding during the night before being discharged, but this did not require surgery, and another (9 %) had urinary retention. No other perioperative complications were observed. The mean visual analogue scale score 1 day and 1 week after surgery was 4.7 ± 1.3 and 2.3 ± 0.5, respectively. At mean follow-up of 4 ± 1.8 years, neither symptomatic nor asymptomatic recurrences have been observed. Two out of three patients presenting with urgency reported regression of symptoms (66.7 %). In all patients suffering from pain after stapled haemorrhoidopexy, the procedure achieved pain relief (2/2, 100 %). No stenoses occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: This technique is a promising alternative after failed stapled haemorrhoidopexy. Morbidity is low. The procedure may effectively treat associated symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24957359     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-014-1180-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  14 in total

1.  Can the procedure for prolapsing hemorrhoids (PPH) be done twice? Results of a porcine model.

Authors:  O Zmora; P Colquhoun; S Abramson; E G Weiss; J Efron; A M Vernava; J J Nogueras; S D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-01-23       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Surgical treatment of circumferential hemorrhoids.

Authors:  F Selvaggi; E Scotto di Carlo; A Silvestri; A Notaroberto; V Maffettone
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Outcome of repeated stapler haemorrhoidopexy for recurrent prolapsing haemorrhoids.

Authors:  I White; S Avital; R Greenberg
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 4.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing stapled haemorrhoidopexy with conventional haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  W-J Shao; G-C H Li; Z H-K Zhang; B-L Yang; G-D Sun; Y-Q Chen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis after stapled haemorrhoidopexy for unrecognized ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  F Selvaggi; G Sciaudone; I Guadagni; G Pellino
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.788

6.  Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  M J Cheetham; N J Mortensen; P O Nystrom; M A Kamm; R K Phillips
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-08-26       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Primary and repeated stapled hemorrhoidopexy for prolapsing hemorrhoids: follow-up to five years.

Authors:  Dennis Raahave; Lars V Jepsen; Ib K Pedersen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-01-19       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy in circumferential third-degree hemorrhoids: long-term results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jong-Sun Kim; Yogesh K Vashist; Sabrina Thieltges; Oliver Zehler; Karim A Gawad; Emre F Yekebas; Jakob R Izbicki; Asad Kutup
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Rectal diverticulum: a new complication of STARR procedure for obstructed defecation.

Authors:  G Sciaudone; C Di Stazio; I Guadagni; F Selvaggi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 10.  Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures.

Authors:  M Pescatori; G Gagliardi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 3.781

View more
  3 in total

1.  Gradual staple line disruption presenting with subtle multidiverticular pocket syndrome after STARR.

Authors:  Gianluca Pellino; Pasquale Petronella; Francesco Selvaggi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2014-12-02

2.  MR Imaging in Diagnosis of Pelvic Floor Descent: Supine versus Sitting Position.

Authors:  Francesca Iacobellis; Antonio Brillantino; Adolfo Renzi; Luigi Monaco; Nicola Serra; Beatrice Feragalli; Aniello Iacomino; Luca Brunese; Salvatore Cappabianca
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.260

3.  Hormonal contraceptives and venous thromboembolism: Are inflammatory bowel disease patients at increased risk? A retrospective study on a prospective database.

Authors:  Gianluca Pellino; Guido Sciaudone; Francesca Caprio; Giuseppe Candilio; G Serena De Fatico; Alfonso Reginelli; Silvestro Canonico; Francesco Selvaggi
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2015-11-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.