Literature DB >> 24771284

Stapled anopexy and STARR in surgical treatment of haemorrhoidal disease.

Italo Corsale1, Marco Rigutini, Niccolò Francioli, Sonia Panicucci, Pietro Adriano Mori, Francesco Aloise.   

Abstract

The treatment of hemorrhoidal disease using stapled anopexy (SA) is still burdened by a high incidence of recurrence. Probably this condition is secondary to inadequate removal of the prolapsed tissue due to the reduced capacity of resection from the adopted device. In order to limit the incidence of failures by providing a removal of a greater amount of prolapsed tissue was considered the opportunity to use the STARR technique even in the presence of haemorrhoidal disease not burdened by symptoms of obstructed defecation. We evaluated the early and at a distance results of 285 patients who had undergone in 2007-2011 surgical resection with trans-anal circular stapler for symptomatic III-IV degree haemorrhoids without obstructed defecation disorders. 237 patients were subjected to SA, while in the remaining 48, since on intervention prolapse committed the CAD more than half of the device, we performed a STARR. adopted the Chi square test (C) considering significant p-values less than 0.05. The anamnestic preoperative evaluation allowed to put the correct indication for surgical treatment in 80% of patients. Mean operative times, hospital stay, incidence of early and more important complications, the symptomatic recurrence of disease (5%) were not dissimilar in the two groups under consideration. Conversely (p < 0.05) the relief of residual asymptomatic disease (24 vs. 10%) was significant . The overall satisfaction was significantly higher in the ST group (73.5 vs 58.6%). The STARR in case of massive prolapse who express themselves with only haemorrhoidal disease is a safe technique, able to optimize the long-term effectiveness of trans-anal resection surgery, limiting the incidence of symptomatic recurrences. The information offered to the patient at the time of the consent to surgery must be extensive and detailed, always considering the possibility of adopting the two techniques alternately and that, at completion of the intervention, could be necessary also the removal of persistent skin tags.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24771284     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-014-0254-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  20 in total

1.  Is simple mucosal resection really possible? Considerations about histological findings after stapled hemorrhoidopexy.

Authors:  Gabriele Naldini; Jacopo Martellucci; Luca Moraldi; Nicola Romano; Mauro Rossi
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-01-24       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Circular stapled anopexy for haemorrhoidal disease: results.

Authors:  P A Lehur; J F Gravié; G Meurette
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  PPH-01 versus PPH-03 to perform STARR for the treatment of hemorrhoids associated with large internal rectal prolapse: a prospective multicenter randomized trial.

Authors:  Adolfo Renzi; Antonio Brillantino; Giandomenico Di Sarno; Francesco D'Aniello; Alfredo Giordano; Alberto Stefanuto; Daniele Aguzzi; Antonio Daffinà; Francesco Ceci; Giuseppe D'Oriano; Massimo Mercuri; Alfonso Alderisio; Luis Perretta; Francesco Carrino; Giovanni Sernia; Ettore Greco; Marcello Picchio; Giuseppe Marino; Angelo Goglia; Amilcare Trombetti; Biagio De Pascalis; Sabatino Panella; Osvaldo Bochicchio; Alfredo Bandini; Luca Del Re; Francesco Longo; Osvaldo Micera
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 2.058

4.  Stapled transanal rectal resection versus stapled anopexy in the cure of hemorrhoids associated with rectal prolapse. A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Paolo Boccasanta; Marco Venturi; Giancarlo Roviaro
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Complications and reoperations in stapled anopexy: learning by doing.

Authors:  Johannes Jongen; Jens-Uwe Bock; Hans-Günter Peleikis; Anne Eberstein; Karin Pfister
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-06-11       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Prospective randomised clinical trial of single versus double purse-string stapled mucosectomy in the treatment of prolapsed haemorrhoids.

Authors:  Francisco Pérez-Vicente; Antonio Arroyo; Pilar Serrano; Fernando Candela; Ana Sánchez; Rafael Calpena
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M Rowsell; M Bello; D M Hemingway
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-03-04       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Long-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Pasquale Giordano; Gianpiero Gravante; Roberto Sorge; Lauren Ovens; Piero Nastro
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2009-03

9.  Day-case stapled (circular) vs. diathermy hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial evaluating surgical and functional outcome.

Authors:  Matti Kairaluoma; Kyösti Nuorva; Ilmo Kellokumpu
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  New approach to large haemorrhoidal prolapse: double stapled haemorrhoidopexy.

Authors:  Gabriele Naldini; Jacopo Martellucci; Pasquale Talento; Angelo Caviglia; Luca Moraldi; Mauro Rossi
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  3 in total

1.  Gradual staple line disruption presenting with subtle multidiverticular pocket syndrome after STARR.

Authors:  Gianluca Pellino; Pasquale Petronella; Francesco Selvaggi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2014-12-02

2.  Comments on stapled anopexy and STARR in surgical treatment of haemorrhoidal disease.

Authors:  Massimiliano Mistrangelo; Francesco Ghiglione; Paolo Tonello
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2014-11-16

3.  Protocol for the development of a Core Outcome Set (COS) for hemorrhoidal disease: an international Delphi study.

Authors:  R R van Tol; J Melenhorst; C D Dirksen; L P S Stassen; S O Breukink
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 2.571

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.