Literature DB >> 15621341

Exposure data for cosmetic products: lipstick, body lotion, and face cream.

L J Loretz1, A M Api, L M Barraj, J Burdick, W E Dressler, S D Gettings, H Han Hsu, Y H L Pan, T A Re, K J Renskers, A Rothenstein, C G Scrafford, C Sewall.   

Abstract

Accurate exposure information for cosmetic products and ingredients is needed in order to conduct safety assessments. Essential information includes both the amount of cosmetic product applied, and the frequency of use. To obtain current data, a study to assess consumer use practices was undertaken. The study included three widely used cosmetic product types: lipstick, body lotion, and face cream. Three hundred and sixty women, ages 19-65 years, who regularly use the products of interest, were recruited at ten different geographical locations within the US. The number of recruits was chosen to ensure a minimum of 300 completes per product type. Subjects were provided with prototype test products, and kept diaries and recorded detailed daily usage information over a two week period. Products were weighed at the start and completion of the study in order to determine the total amount of product used. Statistical analysis of the data was conducted to derive summary distribution of use patterns. The mean and median usage per application, respectively, for the three products was: face cream, 1.22 g and 0.84 g; lipstick, 10 mg and 5 mg; and body lotion, 4.42 g and 3.45 g. The mean and median usage per day for the three products was: face cream, 2.05 g and 1.53 g; lipstick, 24 mg and 13 mg; and body lotion, 8.70 g and 7.63 g. The mean number of applications per day for face cream and lipstick was 1.77 and 2.35, respectively. For body lotion, the mean number of applications per day was dependent on body area, and was 2.12, 1.52, 1.11, 0.95, 0.43, 0.26, and 0.40 for hands, arms, legs, feet, neck and throat, back, and other body areas, respectively. The effect of product preference on use practices was also investigated. This study provides current cosmetic exposure information for commonly used products which will be useful for risk assessment purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15621341     DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol        ISSN: 0278-6915            Impact factor:   6.023


  25 in total

Review 1.  Cosmetics as endocrine disruptors: are they a health risk?

Authors:  Polyxeni Nicolopoulou-Stamati; Luc Hens; Annie J Sasco
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.514

2.  Lipstick consumption and systemic lupus erythematosus: nothing to gloss over.

Authors:  Biji T Kurien; R Hal Scofield
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2008-07-19       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Exposure to common quaternary ammonium disinfectants decreases fertility in mice.

Authors:  Vanessa E Melin; Haritha Potineni; Patricia Hunt; Jodi Griswold; Bill Siems; Stephen R Werre; Terry C Hrubec
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.143

4.  Stochastic modeling of near-field exposure to parabens in personal care products.

Authors:  Susan A Csiszar; Alexi S Ernstoff; Peter Fantke; Olivier Jolliet
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 5.563

5.  Socioeconomic factors influencing cosmetic usage patterns.

Authors:  Gyeong-Hun Park; Chanhee Nam; Seungphil Hong; Byungcheol Park; Hakrim Kim; Taewon Lee; Kyubong Kim; Jong Hee Lee; Myung Hwa Kim
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 5.563

6.  The association of urinary organophosphate ester metabolites and self-reported personal care and household product use among pregnant women in Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Mary E Ingle; Deborah Watkins; Zaira Rosario; Carmen M Vélez Vega; Gredia Huerta-Montanez; Antonia M Calafat; Maria Ospina; José F Cordero; Akram Alshawabkeh; John D Meeker
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 6.498

7.  Women's exposure to phthalates in relation to use of personal care products.

Authors:  Lauren E Parlett; Antonia M Calafat; Shanna H Swan
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 5.563

8.  High-throughput exposure modeling to support prioritization of chemicals in personal care products.

Authors:  Susan A Csiszar; Alexi S Ernstoff; Peter Fantke; David E Meyer; Olivier Jolliet
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 7.086

9.  Personal care product use and urinary phthalate metabolite and paraben concentrations during pregnancy among women from a fertility clinic.

Authors:  Joe M Braun; Allan C Just; Paige L Williams; Kristen W Smith; Antonia M Calafat; Russ Hauser
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 5.563

10.  A perspective on the safety of parabens as preservatives in wound care products.

Authors:  Eveline Torfs; Gilles Brackman
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.