Literature DB >> 15619494

Are negative appendectomies still acceptable?

Kory Jones1, Alberto A Peña, Ernest L Dunn, Lennard Nadalo, Alicia J Mangram.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The goal was to ascertain if there was a significant change in the negative appendectomy (NA) rate in our community hospital with the increased use of computed tomography (CT).
METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of all appendectomies for acute disease performed at our institution from January 2000 to December 2002. There is no established protocol; therefore, CT scans were performed at the discretion of the involved physicians. The results of the physical exams, CT scans and pathology were recorded.
RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-nine appendectomies were performed for appendicitis. There was a progressive increase in the use of CT: 52% in 2000, 74% in 2001, and 86% in 2002. There was also a decrease in the NA rate over the 3 years: 17% in 2000, 9% in 2001 and 2% in 2002. The perforated appendicitis rate decreased from 25% in 2000 to 9% in 2002.
CONCLUSION: The appropriate utilization of CT scan as an aid in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis should decrease the NA rate to 2%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15619494     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.08.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  30 in total

1.  A new approach to accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Nikolaos E Tzanakis; Stamatis P Efstathiou; Kecaris Danulidis; Georgios E Rallis; Dimitrios I Tsioulos; Anthimos Chatzivasiliou; Georgios Peros; Nikolaos I Nikiteas
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Imaging of acute appendicitis in children: EU versus U.S. ... or US versus CT? A European perspective.

Authors:  Herma C Holscher; Hugo A Heij
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-02-03

Review 3.  [Strategy for avoidance of negative appendectomies].

Authors:  M N Wente; H Waleczek
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  The Reliability of a Standardized Reporting System for the Diagnosis of Appendicitis.

Authors:  Vlad V Simianu; Anna Shamitoff; Daniel S Hippe; Benjamin D Godwin; Jabi E Shriki; Frederick T Drake; Ryan B O'Malley; Suresh Maximin; Sarah Bastawrous; Mariam Moshiri; Jean H Lee; Carlos Cuevas; Manjiri Dighe; David Flum; Puneet Bhargava
Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol       Date:  2016-08-02

Review 5.  Pathology of the appendix in children: an institutional experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  Raja Rabah
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-10-10

6.  Changing management of suspected appendicitis in the laparoscopic era.

Authors:  Fayyaz Akbar; Mansoor Yousuf; Richard J Morgan; Andrew Maw
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 7.  Improvement in the diagnosis of appendicitis.

Authors:  Frederick Thurston Drake; David Reed Flum
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  2013

8.  Emergency appendicectomy in the era of laparoscopy: a one-year audit.

Authors:  Z Al Hilli; R S Prichard; G Roche-Nagle; M Leader; D A McNamara; J Deasy
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.568

9.  CT scans and acute appendicitis: a five-year analysis from a rural teaching hospital.

Authors:  Toms Augustin; Siddharth Bhende; Keyur Chavda; Thomas VanderMeer; Burt Cagir
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Progress in the diagnosis of appendicitis: a report from Washington State's Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program.

Authors:  Frederick Thurston Drake; Michael G Florence; Morris G Johnson; Gregory J Jurkovich; Steve Kwon; Zeila Schmidt; Richard C Thirlby; David R Flum
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.