Literature DB >> 17638701

Use of a bioluminescent Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain within an in vitro microbiological system, as a model of wound infection, to assess the antimicrobial efficacy of wound dressings by monitoring light production.

R M S Thorn1, S M Nelson, J Greenman.   

Abstract

A bioluminescent Pseudomonas aeruginosa was incorporated into an in vitro static diffusion method to determine whether light output could be used as a measure of wound dressing efficacy. A significant linear correlation was observed between viable counts and bioluminescence during exponential growth in planktonic culture (r(2) = 0.969). Exponential-phase cells were used to inoculate cellulose discs for integration into an in vitro wound model that incorporated a reservoir of serum. A significant linear correlation was found between bioluminescence (photon counts monitored by a low-light camera) and viable counts in this growth environment (r(2) = 0.982). Three antimicrobial wound dressings were applied to the surface of freshly prepared sample discs within the wound model, and the kill kinetics were codetermined by photon and viable counts. Quantifiable kill rates gave the same order of efficacy for the three wound dressings using both types of measurement, and a significant linear correlation was shown between photon and viable counts (r(2) = 0.873) within this killing environment. Under all defined conditions, a significant linear correlation between bioluminescence and viable counts was shown but the actual slope of the correlation was different, depending on the physicochemical environment of the cells. Hence, significantly more light per cell (P < 0.0001) was produced when cells in discs were exposed to a killing environment compared to a growing environment. As long as defined conditions are employed, the resulting linear correlation enables the state of the system to be continually monitored without disturbance, allowing more immediate and accurate calculations of kill rates without the need for viable counting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17638701      PMCID: PMC2043229          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00302-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  27 in total

Review 1.  Wound microbiology and associated approaches to wound management.

Authors:  P G Bowler; B I Duerden; D G Armstrong
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Expression of lux genes in a clinical isolate of Streptococcus pneumoniae: using bioluminescence to monitor gemifloxacin activity.

Authors:  S J Beard; V Salisbury; R J Lewis; J A Sharpe; A P MacGowan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  A comparison of the antimicrobial effects of four silver-containing dressings on three organisms.

Authors:  S Thomas; P McCubbin
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.072

4.  Induction of light emission by luminescent bacteria treated with UV light and chemical mutagens.

Authors:  Agata Czyz; Konrad Plata; Grzegorz Wegrzyn
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Vibrio harveyi bioluminescence plays a role in stimulation of DNA repair.

Authors:  A Czyz; B Wróbel; G Wegrzyn
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.777

Review 6.  Imaging of light emission from the expression of luciferases in living cells and organisms: a review.

Authors:  Lee F Greer; Aladar A Szalay
Journal:  Luminescence       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.464

7.  Stimulation of DNA repair and increased light output in response to UV irradiation in Escherichia coli expressing lux genes.

Authors:  Kerry L Cutter; Habib M Alloush; Vyv C Salisbury
Journal:  Luminescence       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.464

8.  Real-time monitoring of bacterial infection in vivo: development of bioluminescent staphylococcal foreign-body and deep-thigh-wound mouse infection models.

Authors:  Nelly A Kuklin; Gregory D Pancari; Timothy W Tobery; Leslie Cope; Jesse Jackson; Charles Gill; Karen Overbye; Kevin P Francis; Jun Yu; Donna Montgomery; Annaliesa S Anderson; William McClements; Kathrin U Jansen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Optical monitoring and treatment of potentially lethal wound infections in vivo.

Authors:  Michael R Hamblin; Touqir Zahra; Christopher H Contag; Albert T McManus; Tayyaba Hasan
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 5.226

10.  Direct continuous method for monitoring biofilm infection in a mouse model.

Authors:  Jagath L Kadurugamuwa; Lin Sin; Eddie Albert; Jun Yu; Kevin Francis; Monica DeBoer; Michael Rubin; Carole Bellinger-Kawahara; T R Parr; Pamela R Contag
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.441

View more
  8 in total

1.  Application of bacterial bioluminescence to assess the efficacy of fast-acting biocides.

Authors:  Gareth M Robinson; Katherine M Tonks; Robin M S Thorn; Darren M Reynolds
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Molecular imaging of in vivo gene expression.

Authors:  Allison S Harney; Thomas J Meade
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.808

3.  Photodynamic therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in a mouse skin abrasion model.

Authors:  Tianhong Dai; George P Tegos; Timur Zhiyentayev; Eleftherios Mylonakis; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.025

4.  High-Voltage, Pulsed Electric Fields Eliminate Pseudomonas aeruginosa Stable Infection in a Mouse Burn Model.

Authors:  Mengjie Wu; Andrey Ethan Rubin; Tianhong Dai; Rene Schloss; Osman Berk Usta; Alexander Golberg; Martin Yarmush
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 4.947

5.  Dissolution of silver nanowires and nanospheres dictates their toxicity to Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Meeri Visnapuu; Urmas Joost; Katre Juganson; Kai Künnis-Beres; Anne Kahru; Vambola Kisand; Angela Ivask
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Reduction of Salmonella contamination on the surface of chicken skin using bacteriophage.

Authors:  Robert Joseph Atterbury; Adriano Marcelo Gigante; María de la Salud Rubio Lozano; Ruben Danilo Méndez Medina; Gareth Robinson; Habib Alloush; Paul Andrew Barrow; Vivien Mary Allen
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 4.099

7.  Generating super-shedders: co-infection increases bacterial load and egg production of a gastrointestinal helminth.

Authors:  Sandra Lass; Peter J Hudson; Juilee Thakar; Jasmina Saric; Eric Harvill; Réka Albert; Sarah E Perkins
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 8.  Current Status of In Vitro Models and Assays for Susceptibility Testing for Wound Biofilm Infections.

Authors:  Tania F Bahamondez-Canas; Lara A Heersema; Hugh D C Smyth
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2019-04-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.