Literature DB >> 15616120

Carotid angioplasty and stent placement: comparison of transcranial Doppler US data and clinical outcome with and without filtering cerebral protection devices in 509 patients.

Jan Albert Vos1, Jos C van den Berg, Sjef M P G Ernst, Maarten Jan Suttorp, Timotheus T C Overtoom, Henk W Mauser, Oscar J M Vogels, Hans P M van Heesewijk, Frans L Moll, Yolanda van der Graaf, Willem P T Mali, Rob G A Ackerstaff.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate emboli detected at transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (US) and outcome of carotid angioplasty and stent placement and compare these findings in patients treated with the use of filtering cerebral protection devices (CPDs) with the findings in patients treated without the use of filtering CPDs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by the institutional human research committee. Written informed consent was obtained for all patients. Patients were divided into three groups: 161 patients treated before filtering CPDs had become available (group 1), 151 patients treated with filtering CPDs (group 2), and 197 patients treated without CPDs after CPDs had become available (group 3). Clinical end points were cerebral ischemic events and death. Transcranial Doppler US end points included isolated microemboli, microembolic showers, macroemboli, and distal thrombus. The procedure was divided into five phases: wiring, predilation, stent deployment, postdilation, and CPD handling. Data not distributed normally were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U statistic. For binomial data, the chi(2) test was used. P < .05 indicated statistical significance.
RESULTS: For each phase, median and interquartile range (IQR) for isolated microemboli in group 2 versus group 3 were as follows: wiring, 51 (IQR, 31-69) versus 27 (IQR, 15-48); predilation, 19 (IQR, 13-33) versus 13 (IQR, 8-19); stent deployment, 64 (IQR, 46-82) versus 48.5 (IQR, 33.25-66); and postdilation, 24 (IQR, 14-39) versus 16 (IQR, 11-27.5) (P < .001 for each phase). Median and IQR for microembolic showers were as follows: wiring, 0 (IQR, 0-3) versus 0 (IQR, 0-0); predilation, 1.5 (IQR, 0-4) versus 0 (IQR, 0-2); stent deployment, 22 (IQR, 11-36) versus 11 (IQR, 6-17); postdilation, three (IQR, 0-9) versus one (IQR, 0-4); (postdilation phase, P = .001; all other phases, P < .001). Median for isolated microemboli in group 1 versus groups 2 and 3 combined were as follows: predilation, 10 (IQR, 5-22.75) versus 16 (IQR, 9-25) (P = .001); stent deployment, 32 (IQR, 15-58) versus 54 (IQR, 40.5-74) (P < .001); and postdilation, 11 (IQR, 6-19) versus 18 (IQR, 12-33) (P < .001). Median for microembolic showers during stent deployment were six (IQR, 1-14) versus 13 (IQR, 7-26) (P < .001). Five patients died, and five major strokes and 14 minor strokes occurred. Eight macroemboli occurred in unprotected procedures; six distal thrombi occurred in protected procedures.
CONCLUSION: Carotid angioplasty and stent placement yielded more microemboli in patients treated with filtering CPDs than in unprotected procedures. The infrequent occurrence of cerebral sequelae did not allow comprehensive statistical comparison between groups. (c) RSNA, 2004.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15616120     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2342040119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  25 in total

1.  The role of endovascular expertise in carotid artery stenting: results from the ALKK-CAS-Registry in 5,535 patients.

Authors:  Stephan Staubach; Ralph Hein-Rothweiler; Matthias Hochadel; Manuela Segerer; Ralf Zahn; Jens Jung; Gotthard Riess; Hubert Seggewiss; Andre Schneider; Thomas Fürste; Christian Gottkehaskamp; Harald Mudra
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging lesions after filter-protected stenting of high-grade symptomatic carotid artery stenoses.

Authors:  R du Mesnil de Rochemont; S Schneider; B Yan; A Lehr; M Sitzer; J Berkefeld
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  In-hospital outcomes of transcarotid artery revascularization and carotid endarterectomy in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative.

Authors:  Marc L Schermerhorn; Patric Liang; Hanaa Dakour-Aridi; Vikram S Kashyap; Grace J Wang; Brian W Nolan; Jack L Cronenwett; Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen; Mahmoud B Malas
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 4.  [Treatment of arteriosclerotic diseases of the carotid artery. The carotid stent].

Authors:  I Q Grunwald; P Papanagiotou; C Roth; K M Hartmann; F Ahlhelm; W Reith
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  In vitro performance assessment of distal protection filters: pulsatile flow conditions.

Authors:  Gail M Siewiorek; Mark H Wholey; Ender A Finol
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.487

6.  Unprotected carotid artery stenting in symptomatic patients with high-grade stenosis: results and long-term follow-up in a single-center experience.

Authors:  R Oteros; E Jimenez-Gomez; F Bravo-Rodriguez; J J Ochoa; R Guerrero; F Delgado
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Carotid artery stenting without angioplasty and cerebral protection: a single-center experience with up to 7 years' follow-up.

Authors:  S Baldi; T Zander; M Rabellino; G González; M Maynar
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Association of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization vs Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting With Stroke or Death Among Patients With Carotid Artery Stenosis.

Authors:  Marc L Schermerhorn; Patric Liang; Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen; Jack L Cronenwett; Brian W Nolan; Vikram S Kashyap; Grace J Wang; Raghu L Motaganahalli; Mahmoud B Malas
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Insight into the periprocedural embolic events of internal carotid artery angioplasty. A report of four cases and literature review.

Authors:  L Jiang; F Ling; B Wang; Zhongrong Miao
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 1.610

10.  Cerebral ischemia after filter-protected carotid artery stenting is common and cannot be predicted by the presence of substantial amount of debris captured by the filter device.

Authors:  G Maleux; P Demaerel; E Verbeken; K Daenens; S Heye; F Van Sonhoven; A Nevelsteen; G Wilms
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.