Literature DB >> 16135989

The treatment of large (>70 degrees) thoracic idiopathic scoliosis curves with posterior instrumentation and arthrodesis: when is anterior release indicated?

Douglas C Burton1, Andrew A Sama, Marc A Asher, Stephen W Burke, Oheneba Boachie-Adjei, R C Huang, D W Green, Bernard A Rawlins.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective clinical study from 2 centers.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the efficacy of posterior instrumentation and arthrodesis for thoracic idiopathic scoliosis curves more than 70 degrees. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The increasing use of thoracoscopic techniques in deformity surgery has led several investigators to advocate anterior release followed by posterior instrumentation when treating "stiff" thoracic curves 60 degrees-70 degrees. To our knowledge, no study has been published to define indications for anterior surgery in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.
METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients 20 years and younger, with idiopathic scoliosis and thoracic curves more than 70 degrees treated with isolated posterior instrumentation and arthrodesis at 2 institutions from 1989 to 1999. A total of 50 patients were identified, and 46 were available for minimum 2-year radiographic follow-up. Of the 50 patients, 44 had bend films taken before surgery. All patients were treated with third-generation segmental spinal instrumentation using a varied combination of hooks, wires, and screws.
RESULTS: Average patient age at surgery was 14.4 years (range 10-20), and average radiographic follow-up was 4.4 years (range 2-11.5). Average preoperative thoracic curve was 75 degrees (range 70 degrees-88 degrees), and average bend was 47 degrees (range 28 degrees-60 degrees), a flexibility of 37%. Average postoperative curve was 25 degrees (range 10 degrees-46 degrees), and it was 27 degrees (range 11 degrees-46 degrees) at latest follow-up, a correction of 64%. The average length of surgery was 6.15 hours, mean hospital stay was 8 days, and average blood loss was 1100 cc. The Scoliosis Research Society 22 or 24 was available at a minimum of 2 years in 46 of 50 patients. Mean domain scores were: pain 4.4, self-image 4.3, function 4.3, mental health 4.3, satisfaction 4.7, and total 4.4. Complications included 1 pseudarthrosis, 1 implant removal for prominence, and 1 implant removal for late operative site pain.
CONCLUSION: Using posterior surgery only, we have been able to at least equal the results reported in the literature by investigators using combined approaches. Isolated posterior instrumentation and arthrodesis achieve satisfactory cosmetic, radiographic, and patient-based outcomes in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis with thoracic curves 70 degrees-90 degrees, without the added expense and morbidity of anterior release.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16135989     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000176196.94565.d6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  17 in total

1.  The effect of posterior spinal releases on axial correction torque: a cadaver study.

Authors:  John Wiemann; Shakeel Durrani; Patrick Bosch
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 1.548

Review 2.  Comment regarding "Is anterior release effective to increase flexibility in idiopathic thoracic scoliosis? Assessment by traction films" (A. Hempfing et al.).

Authors:  Vincent Arlet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Is there a need for anterior release for 70-90 degrees masculine thoracic curves in adolescent scoliosis?

Authors:  Vincent Arlet; Liang Jiang; Jean Ouellet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Predictive factors for correction rate in severe idiopathic scoliosis (Cobb angle ≥ 90°): an analysis of 128 patients.

Authors:  Yuki Mihara; Weng Hong Chung; Siti Mariam Mohamad; Chee Kidd Chiu; Chris Yin Wei Chan; Mun Keong Kwan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Posterior instrumentation and fusion.

Authors:  Z Deniz Olgun; Muharrem Yazici
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2012-12-25       Impact factor: 1.548

6.  Long-term experience with simultaneous prone video-assisted thoracoscopic anterior spinal release and posterior spinal fusion in severe rigid pediatric spinal deformities.

Authors:  Chirag A Berry; Viral V Jain; Kedar P Padhye; Alvin H Crawford
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Posterior-only surgery with strong halo-femoral traction for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliotic curves more than 100°.

Authors:  Hong-qi Zhang; Yu-xiang Wang; Chao-feng Guo; Ming-xing Tang; Ling-qiang Chen; Shao-hua Liu; Yong-fu Wang; Jing Chen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Posterior fusion only for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of more than 80 degrees: pedicle screws versus hybrid instrumentation.

Authors:  Mario Di Silvestre; Georgios Bakaloudis; Francesco Lolli; Francesco Vommaro; Konstantinos Martikos; Patrizio Parisini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Preoperative curves of greater magnitude (>70°) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis are associated with increased surgical complexity, higher cost of surgical treatment and a delayed return to function.

Authors:  R C Tarrant; J M Queally; P F O'Loughlin; P Sheeran; D P Moore; P J Kiely
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 1.568

10.  Treatment of severe scoliosis with posterior-only approach arthrodesis and all-pedicle screw instrumentation.

Authors:  Marco Crostelli; Osvaldo Mazza; Massimo Mariani; Dario Mascello
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.