Literature DB >> 1561323

Initial chromosome damage but not DNA damage is greater in ataxia telangiectasia cells.

T K Pandita1, W N Hittelman.   

Abstract

Cells derived from individuals with ataxia telangiectasia (AT) exhibit increased sensitivity to ionizing radiation and certain drugs (e.g., bleomycin, neocarzinostatin, and etoposide) as evidenced by decreased survival and increased chromosome aberrations at mitosis when compared with normal cell lines. To understand better the basis of this sensitivity, three AT and two normal lymphoblastoid cell lines were fractionated into cell cycle phase-enriched populations by centrifugal elutriation and then examined for their survival and their relative initial levels of DNA damage (neutral DNA filter elution) and chromosome damage (premature chromosome condensation). AT cells exhibited decreased levels of survival in all phases of the cell cycle; however, AT cells in early G1 phase were especially sensitive compared with normal cells in G1 phase. While AT and normal cells exhibited similar levels of initial DNA double-strand breaks in exponential populations as well as throughout the cell cycle, AT cells showed nearly twofold higher initial levels of chromosome damage than normal control cells in G1 and G2 phase. These results suggest that there is a higher rate of conversion of DNA double-strand breaks into chromosome breaks in AT cells, perhaps due to a difference in chromatin organization or stability. Thus one determining component of cellular radiosensitivity might include chromatin structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1561323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  29 in total

1.  The role of MOF in the ionizing radiation response is conserved in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Manika P Bhadra; Nobuo Horikoshi; Sreerangam N C V L Pushpavallipvalli; Arpita Sarkar; Indira Bag; Anita Krishnan; John C Lucchesi; Rakesh Kumar; Qin Yang; Raj K Pandita; Mayank Singh; Utpal Bhadra; Joel C Eissenberg; Tej K Pandita
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 2.  The cellular control of DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Shaun P Scott; Tej K Pandita
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 4.429

3.  MOF and histone H4 acetylation at lysine 16 are critical for DNA damage response and double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Girdhar G Sharma; Sairei So; Arun Gupta; Rakesh Kumar; Christelle Cayrou; Nikita Avvakumov; Utpal Bhadra; Raj K Pandita; Matthew H Porteus; David J Chen; Jacques Cote; Tej K Pandita
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  MOF phosphorylation by ATM regulates 53BP1-mediated double-strand break repair pathway choice.

Authors:  Arun Gupta; Clayton R Hunt; Muralidhar L Hegde; Sharmistha Chakraborty; Sharmistha Chakraborty; Durga Udayakumar; Nobuo Horikoshi; Mayank Singh; Deepti B Ramnarain; Walter N Hittelman; Sarita Namjoshi; Aroumougame Asaithamby; Tapas K Hazra; Thomas Ludwig; Raj K Pandita; Jessica K Tyler; Tej K Pandita
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 9.423

5.  hMre11 and hRad50 nuclear foci are induced during the normal cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  R S Maser; K J Monsen; B E Nelms; J H Petrini
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 6.  Role of 53BP1 in the regulation of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice.

Authors:  Arun Gupta; Clayton R Hunt; Sharmistha Chakraborty; Raj K Pandita; John Yordy; Deepti B Ramnarain; Nobuo Horikoshi; Tej K Pandita
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  The product of the ataxia-telangiectasia group D complementing gene, ATDC, interacts with a protein kinase C substrate and inhibitor.

Authors:  P M Brzoska; H Chen; Y Zhu; N A Levin; M H Disatnik; D Mochly-Rosen; J P Murnane; M F Christman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Telomeres, histone code, and DNA damage response.

Authors:  S Misri; S Pandita; R Kumar; T K Pandita
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 1.636

Review 9.  Molecular parameters of hyperthermia for radiosensitization.

Authors:  Tej K Pandita; Shruti Pandita; Sukesh R Bhaumik
Journal:  Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.807

Review 10.  Chromatin remodeling finds its place in the DNA double-strand break response.

Authors:  Tej K Pandita; Christine Richardson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.