Literature DB >> 15611170

Population genetics of the developmental gene optomotor-blind (omb) in Drosophila polymorpha: evidence for a role in abdominal pigmentation variation.

Jennifer A Brisson1, Alan R Templeton, Ian Duncan.   

Abstract

The developmental gene optomotor-blind (omb) encodes a T-box-containing transcription factor that has multiple roles in Drosophila development. Previous genetic analyses established that omb plays a key role in establishing the abdominal pigmentation pattern of Drosophila melanogaster. In this report we examine patterns of omb nucleotide variation in D. polymorpha, a species that is highly polymorphic for the phenotype of abdominal pigmentation. Haplotypes at this locus fall into two classes that are separated by six mutational steps; five of these mutational events result in amino acid changes. Two lines of evidence are consistent with a role for omb in the abdominal pigmentation polymorphism of D. polymorpha. First, we find that haplotype classes of omb are correlated with abdominal pigmentation phenotypes, as are microsatellite repeat numbers in the region. Second, tests of selection reveal that the two haplotype classes have been maintained by balancing selection. Within each class there is a significantly low amount of diversity, indicative of previous selective sweeps. An analysis including D. polymorpha's closest relatives (members of the cardini group) provides evidence for directional selection across species. Selection at this locus is expected if omb contributes to variation in abdominal pigmentation, since this trait is likely of ecological importance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15611170      PMCID: PMC1448714          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.032078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  49 in total

1.  On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination.

Authors:  G A Watterson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  Statistical phylogeography: methods of evaluating and minimizing inference errors.

Authors:  Alan R Templeton
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  Genetics of a difference in pigmentation between Drosophila yakuba and Drosophila santomea.

Authors:  Ana Llopart; Susannah Elwyn; Daniel Lachaise; Jerry A Coyne
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  SPXX, a frequent sequence motif in gene regulatory proteins.

Authors:  M Suzuki
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1989-05-05       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations.

Authors:  Y X Fu; W H Li
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The fidelity of Taq polymerase catalyzing PCR is improved by an N-terminal deletion.

Authors:  W M Barnes
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1992-03-01       Impact factor: 3.688

8.  Molecular evolution of a repetitive region within the per gene of Drosophila.

Authors:  A A Peixoto; S Campesan; R Costa; C P Kyriacou
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Direct and long-range action of a DPP morphogen gradient.

Authors:  D Nellen; R Burke; G Struhl; K Basler
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-05-03       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  The T protein encoded by Brachyury is a tissue-specific transcription factor.

Authors:  A Kispert; B Koschorz; B G Herrmann
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1995-10-02       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  9 in total

1.  Convergent, modular expression of ebony and tan in the mimetic wing patterns of Heliconius butterflies.

Authors:  Laura C Ferguson; Luana Maroja; Chris D Jiggins
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 0.900

2.  Co-evolving wing spots and mating displays are genetically separable traits in Drosophila.

Authors:  Jonathan H Massey; Gavin R Rice; Anggun S Firdaus; Chi-Yang Chen; Shu-Dan Yeh; David L Stern; Patricia J Wittkopp
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Quantitative trait loci affecting the difference in pigmentation between Drosophila yakuba and D. santomea.

Authors:  Mary Anna Carbone; Ana Llopart; Matthew deAngelis; Jerry A Coyne; Trudy F C Mackay
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Quantifying Abdominal Pigmentation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Omid Saleh Ziabari; Alexander W Shingleton
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  The genetic basis of adaptive pigmentation variation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  John E Pool; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 6.  The Genetic Basis of Pigmentation Differences Within and Between Drosophila Species.

Authors:  J H Massey; P J Wittkopp
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Genetic basis of sex-specific color pattern variation in Drosophila malerkotliana.

Authors:  Chen Siang Ng; Andrew M Hamilton; Amanda Frank; Olga Barmina; Artyom Kopp
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-24       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The dynamics and evolutionary potential of domain loss and emergence.

Authors:  Andrew D Moore; Erich Bornberg-Bauer
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  A genome-wide, fine-scale map of natural pigmentation variation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Héloïse Bastide; Andrea Betancourt; Viola Nolte; Raymond Tobler; Petra Stöbe; Andreas Futschik; Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 6.020

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.