Literature DB >> 32363590

Co-evolving wing spots and mating displays are genetically separable traits in Drosophila.

Jonathan H Massey1,2, Gavin R Rice3, Anggun S Firdaus4, Chi-Yang Chen4, Shu-Dan Yeh4, David L Stern2, Patricia J Wittkopp1,5.   

Abstract

The evolution of sexual traits often involves correlated changes in morphology and behavior. For example, in Drosophila, divergent mating displays are often accompanied by divergent pigment patterns. To better understand how such traits co-evolve, we investigated the genetic basis of correlated divergence in wing pigmentation and mating display between the sibling species Drosophila elegans and Drosophila gunungcola. Drosophila elegans males have an area of black pigment on their wings known as a wing spot and appear to display this spot to females by extending their wings laterally during courtship. By contrast, D. gunungcola lost both of these traits. Using Multiplexed Shotgun Genotyping (MSG), we identified a ∼440 kb region on the X chromosome that behaves like a genetic switch controlling the presence or absence of male-specific wing spots. This region includes the candidate gene optomotor-blind (omb), which plays a critical role in patterning the Drosophila wing. The genetic basis of divergent wing display is more complex, with at least two loci on the X chromosome and two loci on autosomes contributing to its evolution. Introgressing the X-linked region affecting wing spot development from D. gunungcola into D. elegans reduced pigmentation in the wing spots but did not affect the wing display, indicating that these are genetically separable traits. Consistent with this observation, broader sampling of wild D. gunungcola populations confirmed that the wing spot and wing display are evolving independently: some D. gunungcola males performed wing displays similar to D. elegans despite lacking wing spots. These data suggest that correlated selection pressures rather than physical linkage or pleiotropy are responsible for the coevolution of these morphological and behavioral traits. They also suggest that the change in morphology evolved prior to the change in behavior.
© 2020 The Authors. Evolution © 2020 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Correlated traits; Drosophila; courtship behavior; optomotor-blind; pigmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32363590      PMCID: PMC7494213          DOI: 10.1111/evo.13990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  46 in total

1.  R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses.

Authors:  Karl W Broman; Hao Wu; Saunak Sen; Gary A Churchill
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 2.  Colour polymorphism and correlated characters: genetic mechanisms and evolution.

Authors:  Jeffrey S McKinnon; Michele E R Pierotti
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  Repeated morphological evolution through cis-regulatory changes in a pleiotropic gene.

Authors:  Benjamin Prud'homme; Nicolas Gompel; Antonis Rokas; Victoria A Kassner; Thomas M Williams; Shu-Dan Yeh; John R True; Sean B Carroll
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers.

Authors:  C S Haley; S A Knott
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Sex chromosomes and sexual selection in poeciliid fishes.

Authors:  Anna Lindholm; Felix Breden
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Multiplexed shotgun genotyping for rapid and efficient genetic mapping.

Authors:  Peter Andolfatto; Dan Davison; Deniz Erezyilmaz; Tina T Hu; Joshua Mast; Tomoko Sunayama-Morita; David L Stern
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  A new chamber for studying the behavior of Drosophila.

Authors:  Jasper C Simon; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The lethal(1)optomotor-blind gene of Drosophila melanogaster is a major organizer of optic lobe development: isolation and characterization of the gene.

Authors:  G O Pflugfelder; H Roth; B Poeck; S Kerscher; H Schwarz; B Jonschker; M Heisenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  An Atlas of Transcription Factors Expressed in Male Pupal Terminalia of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Ben J Vincent; Gavin R Rice; Gabriella M Wong; William J Glassford; Kayla I Downs; Jessica L Shastay; Kenechukwu Charles-Obi; Malini Natarajan; Madelaine Gogol; Julia Zeitlinger; Mark Rebeiz
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 10.  The loci of evolution: how predictable is genetic evolution?

Authors:  David L Stern; Virginie Orgogozo
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  4 in total

1.  Distinct genetic architectures underlie divergent thorax, leg, and wing pigmentation between Drosophila elegans and D. gunungcola.

Authors:  Jonathan H Massey; Jun Li; David L Stern; Patricia J Wittkopp
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-09-18       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 2.  Biology and ecology of the Oriental flower-breeding Drosophila elegans and related species.

Authors:  Yuki Ishikawa; Masahito T Kimura; Masanori J Toda
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 1.143

Review 3.  From Aedes to Zeugodacus: a review of dipteran body coloration studies regarding evolutionary developmental biology, pest control, and species discovery.

Authors:  William A Dion; Tessa E Steenwinkel; Thomas Werner
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 4.665

Review 4.  Evolution of wing pigmentation in Drosophila: Diversity, physiological regulation, and cis-regulatory evolution.

Authors:  Shigeyuki Koshikawa
Journal:  Dev Growth Differ       Date:  2020-04-04       Impact factor: 2.053

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.