Literature DB >> 15608380

Protein imperfections: separating intrinsic from extrinsic variation of torsion angles.

Glenn L Butterfoss1, Jane S Richardson, Jan Hermans.   

Abstract

In this paper, the variation of the values of dihedral angles in proteins is divided into two categories by analyzing distributions in a database of structures determined at a resolution of 1.8 A or better [Lovell et al. (2003), Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 50, 437-450]. The first analysis uses the torsion angle for the Calpha-Cbeta bond (chi1) of all Gln, Glu, Arg and Lys residues ('unbranched set'). Plateaued values at low B values imply a root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) of just 9 degrees for chi1 related to intrinsic structural differences between proteins. Extrapolation to high resolution gives a value of 11 degrees , while over the entire database the RMSD is 13.4 degrees . The assumption that the deviations arise from independent intrinsic and extrinsic sources gives approximately 10 degrees as the RMSD for chi1 of these unbranched side chains arising from all disorder and error over the entire set. It is also found that the decrease in chi1 deviation that is correlated with higher resolution structures is almost entirely a consequence of the higher percentage of low-B-value side chains in those structures and furthermore that the crystal temperature at which diffraction data are collected has a negligible effect on intrinsic deviation. Those intrinsic aspects of the distributions not related to statistical or other errors, data incompleteness or disorder correlate with energies of model compounds computed with high-level quantum mechanics. Mean side-chain torsion angles for specific rotamers correlate well with local energy minima of Ace-Leu-Nme, Ace-Ile-Nme and Ace-Met-Nme. Intrinsic RMSD values in examples with B < or = 20 A2 correlate inversely with calculated values for the relevant rotational energy barriers: from a low of 6.5 degrees for chi1 of some rotamers of Ile to a high of 14 degrees for some Met chi3 for fully tetrahedral angles and much higher for chi angles around bonds that are tetrahedral at one end and planar at the other (e.g. 30 degrees for chi2 of the gauche- rotamer of Phe). For the lower barrier Met chi3 rotations there are relatively more well validated cases near eclipsed values and calculated torques from the rest of the protein structure either confine or force the Cepsilon atom into the strained position. These results can be used to evaluate the variability and accuracy of chi angles in crystal structures and also to decide whether to restrain side-chain angles in refinement as a function of the resolution and atomic B values, depending on whether one aims for a realistic distribution of values or a spread that is statistically suitable to the probable data-set errors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15608380     DOI: 10.1107/S0907444904027325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr        ISSN: 0907-4449


  10 in total

1.  Conformational dependence of 13C shielding and coupling constants for methionine methyl groups.

Authors:  Glenn L Butterfoss; Eugene F DeRose; Scott A Gabel; Lalith Perera; Joseph M Krahn; Geoffrey A Mueller; Xunhai Zheng; Robert E London
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  Population shuffling between ground and high energy excited states.

Authors:  T Michael Sabo; John O Trent; Donghan Lee
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  A DIRICHLET PROCESS MIXTURE OF HIDDEN MARKOV MODELS FOR PROTEIN STRUCTURE PREDICTION.

Authors:  Kristin P Lennox; David B Dahl; Marina Vannucci; Ryan Day; Jerry W Tsai
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 2.083

4.  A test of enhancing model accuracy in high-throughput crystallography.

Authors:  W Bryan Arendall; Wolfram Tempel; Jane S Richardson; Weihong Zhou; Shuren Wang; Ian W Davis; Zhi-Jie Liu; John P Rose; W Michael Carson; Ming Luo; David C Richardson; Bi-Cheng Wang
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2005

Review 5.  Protein design: Past, present, and future.

Authors:  Lynne Regan; Diego Caballero; Michael R Hinrichsen; Alejandro Virrueta; Danielle M Williams; Corey S O'Hern
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.505

6.  Molprobity's ultimate rotamer-library distributions for model validation.

Authors:  Bradley J Hintze; Steven M Lewis; Jane S Richardson; David C Richardson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-06-23

7.  Protein backbone and sidechain torsion angles predicted from NMR chemical shifts using artificial neural networks.

Authors:  Yang Shen; Ad Bax
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2013-06-02       Impact factor: 2.835

8.  Mapping the conformational landscape of a dynamic enzyme by multitemperature and XFEL crystallography.

Authors:  Daniel A Keedy; Lillian R Kenner; Matthew Warkentin; Rahel A Woldeyes; Jesse B Hopkins; Michael C Thompson; Aaron S Brewster; Andrew H Van Benschoten; Elizabeth L Baxter; Monarin Uervirojnangkoorn; Scott E McPhillips; Jinhu Song; Roberto Alonso-Mori; James M Holton; William I Weis; Axel T Brunger; S Michael Soltis; Henrik Lemke; Ana Gonzalez; Nicholas K Sauter; Aina E Cohen; Henry van den Bedem; Robert E Thorne; James S Fraser
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Revisiting the planarity of nucleic acid bases: Pyramidilization at glycosidic nitrogen in purine bases is modulated by orientation of glycosidic torsion.

Authors:  Vladimir Sychrovsky; Silvie Foldynova-Trantirkova; Nada Spackova; Koen Robeyns; Luc Van Meervelt; Wulf Blankenfeldt; Zuzana Vokacova; Jiri Sponer; Lukas Trantirek
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Anomalies in the refinement of isoleucine.

Authors:  Karen R M Berntsen; Gert Vriend
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2014-03-19
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.