Literature DB >> 15598939

In vivo chemosensitivity-adapted preoperative chemotherapy in patients with early-stage breast cancer: the GEPARTRIO pilot study.

G von Minckwitz1, J-U Blohmer, G Raab, A Löhr, B Gerber, G Heinrich, H Eidtmann, M Kaufmann, J Hilfrich, C Jackisch, I Zuna, S D Costa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Response to the first two cycles of preoperative chemotherapy might differentiate subgroups of breast cancer patients with high or minimal chances for a pathologic complete response (pCR) and may be used as an in vivo chemosensitivity test.
METHODS: Breast cancer patients were treated with two cycles of TAC (docetaxel 75 mg/m(2), doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2) every 21 days). Patients whose tumors showed a response received four more cycles. Patients whose tumors did not respond were randomized to four additional cycles TAC or NX (vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8, capecitabine 2000 mg/m(2) days 1-14, every 21 days). The primary end point was pCR at surgery.
RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-five patients showed a clinical response, in 73.0% after two cycles, in 88.4% at surgery, and a pCR was seen in 17.9%. Breast conservation was possible in 72.2%. Responding patients obtained a pCR in 22.6% whereas non-responding patients reached a pCR in 7.3% and 3.1% with TAC or NX, respectively. Grade III/IV neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were observed during TAC in 70.2% and 13.5%, respectively. Significantly less toxicity were observed with NX.
CONCLUSION: Early response to TAC can reliably identify patients with a high chance of achieving a pCR. New effective treatments need to be explored for patients without an early response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15598939     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdi001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  37 in total

1.  Predictive factors of pathologic complete response and clinical tumor progression after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with stage II and III breast cancer.

Authors:  Jae-Heon Jeong; So-Youn Jung; In Hae Park; Keun Seok Lee; Han-Sung Kang; Seok Won Kim; Youngmee Kwon; Eun A Kim; Kyung Lan Ko; Byung-Ho Nam; Seeyoun Lee; Jungsil Ro
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 3.850

2.  Re-Challenging Taxanes in Recurrent Breast Cancer in Patients Treated with (Neo-)Adjuvant Taxane-Based Therapy.

Authors:  Xinrong Guo; Sibylle Loibl; Michael Untch; Volker Möbus; Kathrin Schwedler; Peter A Fasching; Jana Barinoff; Frank Holms; Christoph Thomssen; Dirk M Zahm; Rolf Kreienberg; Maik Hauschild; Holger Eidtmann; Sascha Tauchert; Keyur Mehta; Gunter von Minckwitz
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Polymorphisms in genes involved in drug detoxification and clinical outcomes of anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Chinese Han breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Minghua Ji; Jinhai Tang; Jianhua Zhao; Bin Xu; Jianwei Qin; Jianwei Lu
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 4.742

4.  Prospective phase II study of neoadjuvant doxorubicin followed by cisplatin/docetaxel in locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Taher A Al-Tweigeri; Dahish S Ajarim; Adher A Alsayed; Mohamed M Rahal; Mohamed O Alshabanah; Asma M Tulbah; Osama A Al-Malik; Doha M Fatani; Gamal A El-Husseiny; Naser B Elkum; Adnan A Ezzat
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  BRCA1 protein levels and PIK3CA mutations as predictive biomarkers for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: An exploratory analysis.

Authors:  J Hilton; J Weberpals; I Lorimer; S Amin; S Islam; L Pelletier; M Daneshmand; J Hanson; M Nabavi; D Parolin; R Mallick; S Verma
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  An open-label, randomized, multicenter dose-finding study of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in Chinese breast cancer patients receiving TAC chemotherapy.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Zhiwei Jiang; Ling Wang; Chanjuan Li; Jielai Xia
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 3.064

7.  [Therapy monitoring of neoadjuvant therapy with MRI. RECIST and functional imaging].

Authors:  S Grandl; M Ingrisch; K Hellerhoff
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Patterns of Regression in Breast Cancer after Primary Systemic Treatment.

Authors:  Tamás Zombori; Gábor Cserni
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 9.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for "triple negative" breast cancer: a review of current practice and future outlook.

Authors:  Zeina Nahleh
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.064

10.  State of the art of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: rationale, results and recent developments.

Authors:  Arnd Honig; Lorenz Rieger; Marc Sutterlin; Diethelm Wallwiener; Johannes Dietl; Erich-Franz Solomayer
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2005-09-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.