BACKGROUND: The large individual variability for anticancer drugs in both outcome and toxicity risk makes the identification of pharmacogenetic markers that can be used to screen patients before therapy selection an attractive prospect. AIMS: This work aimed to evaluate the importance of genetic polymorphisms involved in drug detoxification to predict clinical outcomes of anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. RESULTS: GSTP1 313 AA genotype was associated with a poor clinical response relative to G allele carrier (58.4% vs 80.8%; p = 0.006), and MDR1 3435 TT genotype had a worse response compared with C allele carrier (33.3% vs 71.2% p = 0.001). Patients with both the adverse genotypes of GSTP1 314AA and MDR 3435TT showed the worst therapy efficacy in all (14.3%; p = 0.000). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the patients with no adverse genotype were associated with decreased hazard of relapse (p = 0.002), compared with those with 1 or 2 adverse genotypes. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that clinical response and no adverse genotype was independent predictors of disease-free survival (DFS). METHODS: Genotyping was performed by allele-specific oligonucleotide ligation reaction (MnSOD, CAT, GSTP1), multiplex PCR (GSTM1, GSTT1) or PCR-RFLP (MDR1). Based on 153 patients received anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy, these genotypes or their combinations in relation to treatment-related response, hematologic toxicity and DFS were investigated. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that polymorphisms in GSTP1 and MDR1 may help to predict clinical response and DFS of anthracycline-based chemotherapy, and a polygenic pathway approach should provide more useful information. The findings required independent prospective confirmation.
BACKGROUND: The large individual variability for anticancer drugs in both outcome and toxicity risk makes the identification of pharmacogenetic markers that can be used to screen patients before therapy selection an attractive prospect. AIMS: This work aimed to evaluate the importance of genetic polymorphisms involved in drug detoxification to predict clinical outcomes of anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. RESULTS:GSTP1 313 AA genotype was associated with a poor clinical response relative to G allele carrier (58.4% vs 80.8%; p = 0.006), and MDR1 3435 TT genotype had a worse response compared with C allele carrier (33.3% vs 71.2% p = 0.001). Patients with both the adverse genotypes of GSTP1 314AA and MDR 3435TT showed the worst therapy efficacy in all (14.3%; p = 0.000). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the patients with no adverse genotype were associated with decreased hazard of relapse (p = 0.002), compared with those with 1 or 2 adverse genotypes. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that clinical response and no adverse genotype was independent predictors of disease-free survival (DFS). METHODS: Genotyping was performed by allele-specific oligonucleotide ligation reaction (MnSOD, CAT, GSTP1), multiplex PCR (GSTM1, GSTT1) or PCR-RFLP (MDR1). Based on 153 patients received anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy, these genotypes or their combinations in relation to treatment-related response, hematologic toxicity and DFS were investigated. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that polymorphisms in GSTP1 and MDR1 may help to predict clinical response and DFS of anthracycline-based chemotherapy, and a polygenic pathway approach should provide more useful information. The findings required independent prospective confirmation.
Authors: K Mitrunen; P Sillanpää; V Kataja; M Eskelinen; V M Kosma; S Benhamou; M Uusitupa; A Hirvonen Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Andrea Sau; Francesca Pellizzari Tregno; Francesco Valentino; Giorgio Federici; Anna Maria Caccuri Journal: Arch Biochem Biophys Date: 2010-05-28 Impact factor: 4.013
Authors: Jan Stoehlmacher; David J Park; Wu Zhang; Susan Groshen; Denice D Tsao-Wei; Mimi C Yu; Heinz-Josef Lenz Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2002-06-19 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: S Hoffmeyer; O Burk; O von Richter; H P Arnold; J Brockmöller; A Johne; I Cascorbi; T Gerloff; I Roots; M Eichelbaum; U Brinkmann Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2000-03-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Claudia Bănescu; Adrian P Trifa; Septimiu Voidăzan; Valeriu G Moldovan; Ioan Macarie; Erzsebeth Benedek Lazar; Delia Dima; Carmen Duicu; Minodora Dobreanu Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev Date: 2014-11-11 Impact factor: 6.543
Authors: Deirdre P Cronin-Fenton; Mariann Christensen; Timothy L Lash; Thomas P Ahern; Lars Pedersen; Jens Peter Garne; Marianne Ewertz; Herman Autrup; Henrik T Sørensen; Stephen Hamilton-Dutoit Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-01-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Claudia Bănescu; Mihaela Iancu; Adrian P Trifa; Marcela Cândea; Erzsebet Benedek Lazar; Valeriu G Moldovan; Carmen Duicu; Florin Tripon; Andrei Crauciuc; Minodora Dobreanu Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev Date: 2015-12-28 Impact factor: 6.543